Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/70...bs-report-says

    Report: Theo Epstein nears Cubs job

    Theo Epstein is "on the cusp" of joining the Chicago Cubs, according to the Boston Herald.

    The position may include powers greater than his current job as the Boston Red Sox general manager, the paper reports, citing two baseball sources.

    Obstacles in the move include the Red Sox wanting to retain Epstein, or, if he does leave, wanting fair compensation from the Cubs, according to the paper.

    "But this is going to be resolved very soon," a source told the Herald.

    Epstein, who has won two World Series with the Red Sox, has one year remaining on his contract and the team has not said that he will get an extension.
    Wow Cubs fans should be excited if this happens.

  • #2
    Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

    Ya im excited I just hope he turns back into the Theo of young. Not the guy who throws money around on mediocre players the contact he gave Crawford was absurd same with John Lackey. I think it is the Ricketts family just trying to show he wants too win many fans don't like him because he has said in the past like "Cubs fans will show weather we are good or suck i will make money no matter what i will make money". and
    Ricketts is 400m dollars in debt



    Ricketts has said he wanted to focus on the farm system more and retooling it I hope Theo is the guy who can turn our Farm system around and get us pitching our pitchers sucked last year. But the team has so many holes we likely wont compete next year. Theo working with Tim Wilken should be a thing of beauty Wilken is the best scouting director in the Business.

    I really wanted the guy from Tampa Andrew Friedman because he cares more about pitching but I will take Theo and hopefully Ryno or Francona as manager

    But it sounds like Boston didn't want him back they could of stopped this I bet they though it was time to move on.
    Last edited by pacer4ever; 10-11-2011, 08:14 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

      It's starting to look like it. Hope he has another horseshoe up his ***.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

        Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
        Ya im excited I just hope he turns back into the Theo of young. Not the guy who throws money around on mediocre players the contact he gave Crawford was absurd same with John Lackey.
        Huh? He's always had a huge roster payroll. There's no difference in the amount of money they spent this season (160,257,000) and in 2007 when they won the WS (155,402,000).
        Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right. ― Ricky Gervais.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

          I think P4E is thinking about around 2003-04 when he still had a decent payroll (top 5, like the Cubs have) but did wonders with prospects and diamonds in the rough like Ortiz, Youk, Mueller, Millar, etc. (OK, not all those guys are diamonds, but you get the point)
          Twitter: @redfoster
          Proud member of the PTO.
          Smits Happens: Totally Biased NBA News and Opinion

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

            Of those prospects, which of them are from the Red Sox farm system? Off the top of my head (as a Red Sox fan) I'm not sure any of them.

            They were bought and paid for, just like the other 90% of the team.

            The only key players on the Red Sox team, that they didn't just flat out buy is a couple of pitchers, Pedoria, and Ellsbury.

            Theo doesn't put together a team through the draft with prospects. He buys them.

            There's nothing wrong with it, but it is what it is and it's always been that way.
            Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right. ― Ricky Gervais.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

              I guess I don't see the problem, though. This is the Cubs, not the Pirates. They can just go buy their players like the Red Sox did. It's part of being a big market team.

              Also, just because those guys weren't in their farm system (Youk was btw and so were Papelbon, Pedroia, and Ellsbury like you said - seems alright to me), that doesn't mean he doesn't have a good eye to go out and get a flailing David Ortiz from MIN at the right time.

              Would be nice for them to have a farm system, but they can do alright in the next few years without one if Theo gets the right guys at the right prices. That is all I'm saying.
              Twitter: @redfoster
              Proud member of the PTO.
              Smits Happens: Totally Biased NBA News and Opinion

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

                There's no problem. I was just pointing out to P4E that Theo's history is all spending, not just some of it. There's no difference between old Theo and young Theo, outside of phsyical appearance. He operated the same way the entire time he was in charge.
                Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right. ― Ricky Gervais.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

                  Theo built a great farm system the Sox were in the top 10 in terms of farm system 3 of last 4 years. There farm system was near the bottom before he got there. To be a great franchise you need good player development a big reason Theo came was Ricketts plan. Ricketts spent 20m dollars in the draft and international signings a huge change for us. He also is opening a new facility in the Dominican Republic to get young talent. Theo reportedly was blown away. I expect us to have a great farm system and MLB team in 3 years I was skeptical at first but Ricketts has won me over.

                  He knew what he was doing waiting to fire Henry if he wouldn't of waited we would not have Theo.


                  http://www.csnchicago.com/baseball-c...086&feedID=619

                  http://www.chicagonow.com/cubs-den/2...-from-day-one/

                  Ricketts outlined his plan to build through the farm system while also spending wisely on the acquisition of veteran stars who can make an immediate impact on the Cubs. In fact, sources tell us that Ricketts is not opposed to spending big money on a star player, but for him to sign a mega contract the player must fit long-term with the organization. The acquisition of Adrian Gonzalez by the Red Sox is the type of player and commitment that Ricketts is willing to take on with the Cubs. He looks at Gonzalez as a star player, in the prime of his career and a player who is solid both offensively and defensively in addition to being a person of impeccable character. When opportunities like that come along he wants his Cubs to be in a position to make a move for a superstar. It was that willingness to spend when it makes sense in addition to the increased power and salary that will come with his contract that sold Epstein on Ricketts vision for the organization.

                  In addition, Tom Ricketts stressed to Epstein that the family was committed to the Cubs long term and that it wanted to build the franchise the right way. Not trying to quick-fix the major league roster to improve the record. Instead, he showed Epstein his plans for a new spring training complex, a new state of the art academy in the talent rich Dominican Republic, a long term plan for renovating Wrigley Field and thus increasing revenue streams that will impact the major league payroll. Additionally, Ricketts told Epstein of his family's willingness to spend heavily in the draft and on international signings which should translate to a rapidly improving farm system.
                  If you are a Cubs fan you have to love this. Looks like Prince will be the guy we will go after IMO.
                  Last edited by pacer4ever; 10-12-2011, 11:44 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

                    Kevin Youkilis, Dustin Pedroia, Jacoby Ellsbury, Clay Buchholz, Daniel Bard, Jed Lowrie, Jon Lester, Manny Delcarmen, Jonathan Papelbon all came up through the farm system. Other good home-grown guys like Hanley Ramerez (traded for Beckett), Anibal Sanchez (traded for Mike Lowell I think) were used as trade bait. Kelly Shoppach too.

                    an article on the state of their farm system: http://www.splicetoday.com/sports/re...-rich-in-depth

                    As a Reds fan, I hate this, because the Cubs will actually have a plan now.
                    The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

                      Originally posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
                      Kevin Youkilis, Dustin Pedroia, Jacoby Ellsbury, Clay Buchholz, Daniel Bard, Jed Lowrie, Jon Lester, Manny Delcarmen, Jonathan Papelbon all came up through the farm system. Other good home-grown guys like Hanley Ramerez (traded for Beckett), Anibal Sanchez (traded for Mike Lowell I think) were used as trade bait. Kelly Shoppach too.

                      an article on the state of their farm system: http://www.splicetoday.com/sports/re...-rich-in-depth

                      As a Reds fan, I hate this, because the Cubs will actually have a plan now.
                      Ya I was gonna look that up they are one of the most successful teams in terms of home grown players. I believe St Louis has had the most make it to the MLB league but the Sox were in the top 5.


                      The Central is wide open next year. Prince we be off the Brewers and Pujols could leave and either way will hurt the Cards If they have to pay him like he wants that could cripple them in future years.


                      I don't expect us to really compete for 2-5 years but really the central is wide open. Our pitching was so bad last year it would take a miracle to turn that around by just next year. But in 5 years I hope we have a pitching heavy system that way we wont have to over spend on mediocre free agent pitchers.
                      Last edited by pacer4ever; 10-13-2011, 12:18 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

                        Obviously they're going to have some players on the roster from their farm system. Even the Yankees have players from their farm system as every day players.


                        Spending money has been the path he's taken in order to build a contender. There's no way around it. Just take a look at their year by year salary. There's no attempt to rein it in.

                        Hell, they spent $90million, or some outrageous figure, just to have the rights to talk to DiceK.
                        Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right. ― Ricky Gervais.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

                          Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                          Obviously they're going to have some players on the roster from their farm system. Even the Yankees have players from their farm system as every day players.


                          Spending money has been the path he's taken in order to build a contender. There's no way around it. Just take a look at their year by year salary. There's no attempt to rein it in.

                          Hell, they spent $90million, or some outrageous figure, just to have the rights to talk to DiceK.
                          6 all stars isnt just players from the farm system. That is 6 all stars built from within that you dont have to overpay for at least 6 years thats why it is a big key. Cubs currently only have a few homegrown players and Starlin is the only all star who is stilling playing at that level. And even his game is flawed the guy is an error machine we need more homegrown talent. We have one guy in the system who should make an impact next season and that's it.

                          Ya he has been **** in free agency. But his trades and building the farm system has been great. I think he will be more cautious with the money. I also think the Ricketts family will spend 130m to 150m if we are spending it wisely I still think he will be allowed to spend. The Cubs have 50m dollars coming off the books so we can spend this year I just hope we don't overspend especially on a guy who is old like Pujols it will be good for the first few years but would suck on the back end of the deal. Or on mediocre pitching that is available I hope he can work some magic getting young cheap pitching via trade.

                          But Theo wont have the pressure to spend like he did in Boston. In Boston he and his owner we competing vs New York and showing their fans they will spend almost as much as the Yanks. Both the Yanks and Boston spends blindly. Brian Cashman said he didn't want Rafaelia Soriono. But his owner wanted him so they got him. I think that happens a lot in NY and BOS. I just hope he never gives a player like Crawford that kind of contract in Chicago. We dont need another Alfonso Soriono.


                          Theo didnt have full control in Boston he will in Chicago. The only person Theo reports to is Tom Ricketts in Boston he had other superiors.
                          Last edited by pacer4ever; 10-13-2011, 04:58 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

                            So I just looked through the Cubbies farm system, man, pretty baren, Matt Garza's a nice SP but losing those prospects hurt. Gonna take some time.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Theo Epstein to the Cubs?

                              Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                              So I just looked through the Cubbies farm system, man, pretty baren, Matt Garza's a nice SP but losing those prospects hurt. Gonna take some time.
                              I didnt like the move at the time. But really the only good spects we traded was Archer and Lee. I think it wont kill us but I didnt like the move. Henery loved to do moves like that and it really hurt our system. Brett Jackson will be the starting CF next year Kenny Mcnutt may be in the rotation or pen. But after that you have to go to A or AA ball to find our good spects. Matt Szcuer is gonna be good was in the futures game. I like Zeke DeVoss and a lot of other player we got in this years draft. We took Dillion Maples in the 14th rd and paid him 1st round money he only dropped because they though he was going to NC. He was a 1st rd talent We spent more than we ever have in the draft our low levels should be really good next year. Ricketts says he is committed to player development and spending in the draft and on international free agents.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X