Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Biggest Loser 2017

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Biggest Loser 2017

    Well fellas, 2017 has snuck up on me and I am late as always. Just weighed in Wednesday at 315 fully clothed down from 13 pounds at last check in and was naked then and this time fully clothed. They may have found what is wrong with my lungs too. My new pulmonologist said severe asthma and a bunch of allergies. I am allergic to three local grasses, thistles, walnut trees, and dog dander. Started some new meds and a new inhaler. I had a goal of sub 300 lbs by June at the beginning of the year so I am shooting a little higher and dropping that goal to 280. If I can do that I will have crossed the 100 pounds lost goal since my lap band surgery in 2015.

  • #2
    Re: Biggest Loser 2017

    Down to around 180 pounds now. Crazy that I'm very close to the end of the grind from weighing 328 in June 2015.
    "It's just unfortunate that we've been penalized so much this year and nothing has happened to the Pistons, the Palace or the city of Detroit," he said. "It's almost like it's always our fault. The league knows it. They should be ashamed of themselves to let the security be as lax as it is around here."

    ----------------- Reggie Miller

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Biggest Loser 2017

      Hello guys just checking in and seeing if anyone else has had some progress. I just saw the doctor two weeks ago and weighed 306 clothed. I have changed my goal now to be sub 300 pounds by April 10th when I see my lap band doctor. I just want to see them surprised as I was 344 at my last visit 3 months ago. The asthma meds are not working though so I am still not doing well in the health area. Hopefully I will be trying to make a little cash in my garage building a few engines a month for a hobby and it will keep me busy and I can drop some more pounds. Being broke from going through the divorce still helps too as I am not having the money to go out to eat.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Biggest Loser 2017

        My weight has always fluctuated wildly, and around the end of 2016 I was in the 290 range again. I have cut alcohol consumption completely since the New Year along with other changes, and I weighed in at 275 this morning. Now, I have been experimenting with Shakeology. I feel pretty confident that I can lose a lot more if I can settle in on a good routine. Weekends are the battle right now, because I have been eating leaner during the work week.
        Edit Signature

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Biggest Loser 2017

          Well, I suffered through a bout of edema and ended up weighing 309 at the doctors so it will be my goal to be around 280 when I go back in 3 months. On a good note today I am back at 301. The whole knee injury had killed my exercise options right now. I saw the orthopedic doctor last Monday and she said the progress has been much slower than expected and I see her in three weeks to discuss surgical options and get an MRI. Hopefully I will not be recovering all summer from knee surgery. On a positive note, many of you guys know my 20+ year battle with the VA and my disability rating there. The battle was finally won and I was awarded permanent and total 100% disabled. I may never be able to work again, but the benefits I will be getting will be good.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Biggest Loser 2017

            I just want to say congratulations to all of you doing this to better your health! My parents are diabetics, my grandparents are diabetics, and I WILL NOT BE ONE. I am down from 185 hovering at 155. Watching my carbs as closely as possible while working out a few days a week. It is a real challenge but it's an important one.
            Indiana State University Alum. Hardcore Pacers fan. Racecar Driver in need of sponsorship.

            www.jjhughesracing.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Biggest Loser 2017

              Originally posted by Guardshock View Post
              I just want to say congratulations to all of you doing this to better your health! My parents are diabetics, my grandparents are diabetics, and I WILL NOT BE ONE. I am down from 185 hovering at 155. Watching my carbs as closely as possible while working out a few days a week. It is a real challenge but it's an important one.
              Yeah a lot of my family are diabetics and I was on an easy path to one but I feel like I've cut the odds a lot.

              My weight loss has slowed slightly, around 175 right now...its hard because people now want me to stop losing weight and saying I don't look healthy face wise and stuff. I know I probably have like 8-10 pounds of excess skin that I'm not going to have surgery on, almost my reminder.
              "It's just unfortunate that we've been penalized so much this year and nothing has happened to the Pistons, the Palace or the city of Detroit," he said. "It's almost like it's always our fault. The league knows it. They should be ashamed of themselves to let the security be as lax as it is around here."

              ----------------- Reggie Miller

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Biggest Loser 2017

                I've been scared to go near a scale for a while. Kind of frustrating, I was about 30 pounds from my (revised) goal weight. For a long time I was thinking 220 was a good place for me to be, but then my weight got lower and lower, I revised that to 200. I got down to 232, amazing, and even though typically that last bit of weight is difficult to take off, I thought I had an ace up my sleeve as I was slated to start chemotherapy for leukemia (not to worry, I have the "jackpot" leukemia -CLL, very slow moving, not really a lot of symptoms.) They had given me the chemo information packet, which contains all the info about appetite loss, vomiting, nausea, etc., I thought for sure I could turn this negative aspect of chemotherapy into a positive, by piggybacking my chemo towards my goal weight.

                What happened in reality was, i suffered very little in the way of side effects of chemo, and I also started eating like a hog. I guess I've probably put on at least 30 pounds since October of last year, eeee

                However, chemo is done, outlook is good, I've started getting out on my bike regularly and I can tell I've lost some of that weight back now. I want to lose a bit more before I venture near a scale again though

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Biggest Loser 2017

                  Checking in.

                  I'm down to 188 from a high of 196. Goal is 170. Can't seem to shake getting under 188. I've started doing Kickboxing (usually 2-3 times a week) in addition to working out 3 times a week, so I can burn around 800 calories in an hour. I've cut out a lot of sugar, but need to do better. Every Sunday my wife and I make these quinoa bowls - quinoa, veggies and baked chicken. While I haven't lost weight because of it, I notice that I don't get that tired feeling around 2pm like I would having gone downstairs at the office and getting a chicken wrap and fries. And they are delicious too! Still eating too many calories, so I'm eating smaller portion sizes at dinner now. It's tough cause I'm used to eating big dinners, but I want to lose weight more than I want to eat.

                  Keep up the good work everyone. Even if you are in a bad place, keep trying.
                  First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Biggest Loser 2017

                    Originally posted by Dab View Post
                    I've been scared to go near a scale for a while. Kind of frustrating, I was about 30 pounds from my (revised) goal weight. For a long time I was thinking 220 was a good place for me to be, but then my weight got lower and lower, I revised that to 200. I got down to 232, amazing, and even though typically that last bit of weight is difficult to take off, I thought I had an ace up my sleeve as I was slated to start chemotherapy for leukemia (not to worry, I have the "jackpot" leukemia -CLL, very slow moving, not really a lot of symptoms.) They had given me the chemo information packet, which contains all the info about appetite loss, vomiting, nausea, etc., I thought for sure I could turn this negative aspect of chemotherapy into a positive, by piggybacking my chemo towards my goal weight.

                    What happened in reality was, i suffered very little in the way of side effects of chemo, and I also started eating like a hog. I guess I've probably put on at least 30 pounds since October of last year, eeee

                    However, chemo is done, outlook is good, I've started getting out on my bike regularly and I can tell I've lost some of that weight back now. I want to lose a bit more before I venture near a scale again though
                    My best friend's cancer went into remission a couple of months ago. I'm glad chemo is over for you. It'll be an awesome day when science improves and we no longer need to poison ourselves to get 'rid' of cancer.
                    First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Biggest Loser 2017

                      Well guys is was down to 292.4 pounds a few weeks back. I was doing well and ended up going through a few weeks stretch where I ate poorly and ended up back at 307. On the way back down at 302 right now. This knee injury is killing any chances of exercise right now. Been through physical therapy like they wanted with no improvement so maybe I can convince the higher ups with Indiana HIP insurance that maybe they should allow an MRI.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Biggest Loser 2017

                        What's up guys? Well I am down to 284.6 pounds. Unfortunately I was admitted to the the hospital Friday night and with any luck will be going home tomorrow. I had another incident where I collapsed, presumably from a huge drop in blood pressure. When I collapsed again my legs took the brunt of the injury. It happened Thursday but I was stubborn and did not go get checked until Friday after picking my kids up from school and walking around all day. I ended up in the Anderson Community Hospital ER yesterday because my daughter insisted on me going. Good call from her as I could have had it much worse. My blood pressure was 75/43 upon admission and they are pumping me full of potassium and I had other issues in my bloodwork. I have now had 7 bags IV'd through me. I now have a broken left leg to go along with my bad right knee from the last time I collapsed which I aggravated on the fall too. Thankfully my daughter was so insistent to make me go to the ER as she very well may have saved my life.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X