Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

    Get him a couple screen plays, I think he's got the potential to put up an 80 yard rushing and 80 yard receiving day before this year is through.

    Is he a perfect running back? No he's not, but he reminds of Jerome Bettis in a lot of ways. Quick feet, powerful runner, and Bettis was much better in open space than he ever got credit for.

    I would like to start the game against STL this weekend with a couple screens similar to the big 24 yard gain Trent picked up on our last drive Sunday in Houston. Build off of that big play.

    Also, I don't know if it's been pointed out anywhere, but on the 58 yard pass to TY, Trent made a hell of a blcok to pick up the blitz, Luck still got hit by someone who got through elsewhere, but after Luck pops up from the ground and starts running down the field to celebrate, he and Trent find each other and dap each other up both for the block and throw. Which is a great thing to see, if Luck believes in Trent's pass protection it will help calm him down so much.


    Comment


    • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

      Originally posted by ColeTheMole View Post
      I'm starting to come to that side. I love Richardson, I want him to do well really badly. But to be worthy of a first round pick, you have to be worth a lot. No one is denying that he has talent, but I am denying that he is worthy of a first round pick as of now. The majority of the jury is still deliberating since we don't even have half of a season of Richardson to judge on, but the early results show he simply isn't worthy of a first round pick.

      Why do we get to pick and choose what players we use the o-line excuse, the formation excuse etc. with? I haven't heard anyone getting angry about not using DHB to his strengths, we just chastise him for dropping balls. I hope T-Rich gets better. But right now, I'm putting the responsibility square on his shoulders.
      This is what my question is when the offensive line is always brought up to defend Trent. I am no expert on the offensive line play so what are they doing now that is different than when Bradshaw was having success? Why was Bradshaw who is new to the system as well able to run the ball with a lot of success behind the same offensive line that Trent has? Bradshaw looked like the lead back that we need and Trent looks like any other average running back in this league. Ballard last year ran better behind a worse offensive line and he was still able to perform much better. Football Outsiders has us graded through 8 weeks as one of the top 10 best offensive lines in the league when it comes to run blocking. So what am I missing here with the offensive line?

      To me the thing that can defend Trent the best is the inability of Pep to get Trent into formations that work best for him. Even before Wayne was hurt we would go with all of these huge packages with three tight ends and announce to everyone that we were running the ball. To me we really should be passing the ball to set up the run and get Trent into formations that get him into space. Spread them out and let him run the ball. Give him screens and draw plays that can get him into space.

      Comment


      • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

        People don't get angry about not using DHB to his strengths, because he drops the damn ball when they try. How many screen passes has he dropped this year? Multiple. He's a WR, not a RB, so his strenth is catching the ball, then running with it and he doesn't do the first step.
        Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right. ― Ricky Gervais.

        Comment


        • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

          Originally posted by Since86 View Post
          People don't get angry about not using DHB to his strengths, because he drops the damn ball when they try. How many screen passes has he dropped this year? Multiple. He's a WR, not a RB, so his strenth is catching the ball, then running with it and he doesn't do the first step.
          I don't remember him dropping screen passes. Deep balls? Yeah, a lot.
          Never forget

          Comment


          • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

            Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
            Get him a couple screen plays, I think he's got the potential to put up an 80 yard rushing and 80 yard receiving day before this year is through.

            Is he a perfect running back? No he's not, but he reminds of Jerome Bettis in a lot of ways. Quick feet, powerful runner, and Bettis was much better in open space than he ever got credit for.

            I would like to start the game against STL this weekend with a couple screens similar to the big 24 yard gain Trent picked up on our last drive Sunday in Houston. Build off of that big play.

            Also, I don't know if it's been pointed out anywhere, but on the 58 yard pass to TY, Trent made a hell of a blcok to pick up the blitz, Luck still got hit by someone who got through elsewhere, but after Luck pops up from the ground and starts running down the field to celebrate, he and Trent find each other and dap each other up both for the block and throw. Which is a great thing to see, if Luck believes in Trent's pass protection it will help calm him down so much.
            The TD run that Luck had against the Broncos was aided by a fantastic block by TRich, who not only stonewalled the blitzer at the line of scrimmage but didn't disengage the block until the ref had the ball.
            Edit Signature

            Comment


            • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

              Originally posted by thewholefnshow31 View Post
              This is what my question is when the offensive line is always brought up to defend Trent. I am no expert on the offensive line play so what are they doing now that is different than when Bradshaw was having success? Why was Bradshaw who is new to the system as well able to run the ball with a lot of success behind the same offensive line that Trent has? Bradshaw looked like the lead back that we need and Trent looks like any other average running back in this league. Ballard last year ran better behind a worse offensive line and he was still able to perform much better. Football Outsiders has us graded through 8 weeks as one of the top 10 best offensive lines in the league when it comes to run blocking. So what am I missing here with the offensive line?

              To me the thing that can defend Trent the best is the inability of Pep to get Trent into formations that work best for him. Even before Wayne was hurt we would go with all of these huge packages with three tight ends and announce to everyone that we were running the ball. To me we really should be passing the ball to set up the run and get Trent into formations that get him into space. Spread them out and let him run the ball. Give him screens and draw plays that can get him into space.
              We've already covered this. It's not the same line. We've lost some guys and point blank, the overall unit play has decreased dramatically. Against San Fran, for instance, our line played fantastic and it looked like we were really righting the o-line ship.... ever since then it's been downhill. All you have to do is open your eyes and watch, and not make broad sweeping statements like "it's the same line". It's not. Lines aren't static, and units don't play at a static level all year. Watch the games.... watch the line. You'll see they are getting pushed back and blown up on almost every play. The only running plays we seem to succeed at is when we go into a receiver set and bring in DBrown as a change of pace back, they push one direction, and he reverses it.... and on those plays we actually make running lanes and holes behind the action, which he does a decent job of hitting. There's less defenders (and thus offensive teammates) in the area, so there's more space to work in. That's exactly what DBrown is good for -- change of pace. He's not a workhorse back. He's best designed to be that back you sub in every few series and try to hit a home run with. DBrown is faster than ****, accelerates and runs straight-line very fast, so when he hits those holes, it's a good thing. But he's not powerful. He's not a shifty, patient runner. It's get ball and go 100mph until stopped. That's his one trick. He's not the best pass blocker. He's not the best receiver, he's not as good in the open field. TRich is a much better overall back than DBrown. Brown has him in one category --- burst. And right now, burst is about all anyone can do with the holes we're (not) getting from the line. Basically, what we're seeing is that Brown has enough burst to get through that line before the portal collapses. Literally.

              Not only that, but Luck's protection has been pretty awful. They go through stretches where they "sort of" get it together for a few successive plays and Luck is able to stick around in the pocket. Luck is completely masking that issue right now. His ability to escape the pressure is phenomenal and deliver under pressure, and even with guys hanging on him... however he's still on pace for more hits/knockdowns/bothers this year than he was last year, which was not a good year in that category.

              The line has been terrible, and has only decreased all year. If we have to put Hasselbeck in there at any point this year for any reason, he's going to get eaten alive. That's probably the biggest scenario I can point to that truly proves how terrible our line is right now. We know what Luck's doin.... now substitute him with Matt and tell me you have any confidence at all that he won't get just absolutely battered by this line. Hasselbeck is a pretty good QB behind a decent line. That right there, along with absolutely no run holes, is what you call, an offensive line unit failure. It's terrible. But you still have the knuckleheads on here with their "dude, TRich has minus-5 ypc, we lost that trade".
              Last edited by Kid Minneapolis; 11-05-2013, 02:04 PM.
              There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

              Comment


              • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

                Originally posted by thewholefnshow31 View Post
                This is what my question is when the offensive line is always brought up to defend Trent. I am no expert on the offensive line play so what are they doing now that is different than when Bradshaw was having success? Why was Bradshaw who is new to the system as well able to run the ball with a lot of success behind the same offensive line that Trent has? Bradshaw looked like the lead back that we need and Trent looks like any other average running back in this league. Ballard last year ran better behind a worse offensive line and he was still able to perform much better. Football Outsiders has us graded through 8 weeks as one of the top 10 best offensive lines in the league when it comes to run blocking. So what am I missing here with the offensive line?

                To me the thing that can defend Trent the best is the inability of Pep to get Trent into formations that work best for him. Even before Wayne was hurt we would go with all of these huge packages with three tight ends and announce to everyone that we were running the ball. To me we really should be passing the ball to set up the run and get Trent into formations that get him into space. Spread them out and let him run the ball. Give him screens and draw plays that can get him into space.
                I have beaten this point to death but I will again. Football Outsiders gives a huge amount of credit to the Line as long as you don't get stuffed behind the line of scrimmage. This is why the Colts rank high but that isn't to say that they are opening up great holes for the running back. IF you scroll down the listings you see that the COlts run it the most where they are least effective which is off the guards and center. They run it the least where they rank number one which is off the tackles. That doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to me but what it does tell me is that we are trying to force a square peg in a round hole.


                Bradshaw looked below average vs Oakland, then was good against Miami and was great vs San Fransico which was the game that Samson Satele missed McGlynn started at center. The longer this line has been together the more I believe McGlynn and Satele can't coexist. The stats really play out that way as well so I expect one of them to be gone at some point. To your point though the line hasn't been together the entire year. The best blocking TE went on IR and Donald Thomas injury forced the line to shuffle and Statele aslo missed two games.

                In Vick Ballards only game we ran a grand total of 2 big packages and he had a 4.9 avg.
                Last edited by Gamble1; 11-05-2013, 02:19 PM.

                Comment


                • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

                  This was before the Texans game, but this is a good analysis of Richardson versus the line with some videos of plays to illustrate:

                  http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/10/...-colts-offense

                  One of his paragraphs illustrate how I feel about Richardson right now:

                  Now that I’ve watched a lot of what Trent Richardson has done this year, I feel confident saying that his 3.0 yards per carry average is more a product of his environment than of him directly. The Colts just aren’t a very good run blocking team as of right now. But my worry is that he’s a lot closer to being the back his stats say he is, than he is to being a back that’s worthy of a first-round pick.
                  I can see more why people feel Richardson could be very good with a good line. But I think that makes him a terrible scheme fit. It's very difficult to rebuild a line as offensive line is one of the scarcest positions in the NFL. The Colts already having Luck will likely choose pass blockers over run graders if they have to choose. The Colts are already good, so building a line through the draft will be harder, and now they have one less pick because of Richardson. And it's only a couple more years before Luck, Hilton, Richardson all hit free agency at the same time, so while the Colts have cap space now they have to be very careful with it. And of course there are always other holes to fill, including still several on defense. All those factors make the possibility of having a good to great run blocking line anytime soon seem remote, and therefore if Richardson is going to work out he better have the talent to run behind an average or worse run line. I'm not sure he does.

                  I do feel that the Texans game was Richardson's best game at taking the yards that were available. I did think the best move of the night came on Brown's big run though when he slid past defenders into the hole in a way that I'm not sure Trent can do.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

                    Originally posted by Cubs231721 View Post
                    This was before the Texans game, but this is a good analysis of Richardson versus the line with some videos of plays to illustrate:

                    http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/10/...-colts-offense

                    One of his paragraphs illustrate how I feel about Richardson right now:



                    I can see more why people feel Richardson could be very good with a good line. But I think that makes him a terrible scheme fit. It's very difficult to rebuild a line as offensive line is one of the scarcest positions in the NFL. The Colts already having Luck will likely choose pass blockers over run graders if they have to choose. The Colts are already good, so building a line through the draft will be harder, and now they have one less pick because of Richardson. And it's only a couple more years before Luck, Hilton, Richardson all hit free agency at the same time, so while the Colts have cap space now they have to be very careful with it. And of course there are always other holes to fill, including still several on defense. All those factors make the possibility of having a good to great run blocking line anytime soon seem remote, and therefore if Richardson is going to work out he better have the talent to run behind an average or worse run line. I'm not sure he does.

                    I do feel that the Texans game was Richardson's best game at taking the yards that were available. I did think the best move of the night came on Brown's big run though when he slid past defenders into the hole in a way that I'm not sure Trent can do.
                    I also read Muths anaylsis and I agree on most of his points and its refreshing to hear a offensive linemens point of view. His criticism of Likenbach is pretty accurate overall but you confused me why you think it will be hard to build the line.

                    In the draft the LT's are the premium picks in the first round and we have already selected 2 offensive lineman in the last draft. One being a center and the other a guard who is starting and looks pretty good except for that Texans game when he was matched up one on one most of the night.

                    The Colts will also get Donald Thomas back for next year so really the Colts need to use one more pick on the offensive line if your believe the tackles are fine and I do.

                    Trent also fits the scheme just fine but the scheme is not capable of being ran due to the line. I also have a hard time believeing that Chuck and the FO will give up on the scheme simply becuase the line is underperforming. They will use more money or more picks to fix it and who knows it may have been fixed if Thomas doesn't get hurt.

                    The part however I disagreed with Muths points is that Trent needs to become a Jammal Charles or McCoy type back. Thats not who he is and personally I think those type of backs get banged up to easily and can't sustain the NFL pounding of a power running game which is the "scheme" of the Colts.
                    Last edited by Gamble1; 11-05-2013, 03:41 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

                      Originally posted by Cubs231721 View Post
                      This was before the Texans game, but this is a good analysis of Richardson versus the line with some videos of plays to illustrate:

                      http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/10/...-colts-offense

                      One of his paragraphs illustrate how I feel about Richardson right now:



                      I can see more why people feel Richardson could be very good with a good line. But I think that makes him a terrible scheme fit. It's very difficult to rebuild a line as offensive line is one of the scarcest positions in the NFL. The Colts already having Luck will likely choose pass blockers over run graders if they have to choose. The Colts are already good, so building a line through the draft will be harder, and now they have one less pick because of Richardson. And it's only a couple more years before Luck, Hilton, Richardson all hit free agency at the same time, so while the Colts have cap space now they have to be very careful with it. And of course there are always other holes to fill, including still several on defense. All those factors make the possibility of having a good to great run blocking line anytime soon seem remote, and therefore if Richardson is going to work out he better have the talent to run behind an average or worse run line. I'm not sure he does.

                      I do feel that the Texans game was Richardson's best game at taking the yards that were available. I did think the best move of the night came on Brown's big run though when he slid past defenders into the hole in a way that I'm not sure Trent can do.
                      There's a difference. I believe we're *trying* for a specific power scheme. Trent fits that scheme. The problem is, the line is not executing. I also disagree that o-line is scarce and hard to rebuild.

                      That same line of logic would dictate that we should have passed on Luck, since we didn't have an established offensive line. You get talent, and you build around it.
                      There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

                        Originally posted by Kid Minneapolis View Post
                        That same line of logic would dictate that we should have passed on Luck, since we didn't have an established offensive line. You get talent, and you build around it.
                        Let's not compare the line play for quarterbacks and running backs. It's totally different and Luck has a lot more control over the offense (audibles, quick throws, scrambling, dump offs, etc.) than any running back could possibly have.

                        Comment


                        • That's really not a good argument.

                          Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
                          There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

                            Originally posted by Kid Minneapolis View Post
                            That's really not a good argument.

                            Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
                            Pray tell, why is it not a good argument?

                            Comment


                            • Re: Trent Richardson to Colts for 1st round pick

                              If Richardson needs an elite line to run behind, how good is he really? Does the fact that Donald Brown has been relatively effective behind our crappy line make him an above average NFL RB?

                              I am not out to get Richardson in vnzla fashion (and I don't think cdash is either) but I am pretty concerned.

                              Comment


                              • So you're concerned that a guy getting hit as soon as he gets the ball doesn't perform some sort of miracle.

                                Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
                                There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X