Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

    Bill you're being a little over dramatic lol


    Comment


    • #32
      Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

      Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
      Bill you're being a little over dramatic lol
      ME? NEVER! I AM NEVER OVER DRAMATIC!
      BillS

      A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
      Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

        Originally posted by Mackey_Rose View Post
        The only, and even this is very flimsy, argument that can be made that STH's deserve first rights to ancillary events (such as an ASG, concerts, boxing matches, etc.) at the Fieldhouse is if the Pacers forced them to buy PSL's.

        That isn't the case.
        "deserve"?

        Or actually do?

        I'm not sure they have the right to their exact same seats. Box owners do, and perhaps club level. But there may be presale rights or other benefits. As I said in last week's thread on the same topic, our work tickets for the Bulls/ Blackhawks allow us into the presales or the right to purchase our regular ticket to an event.

        The question is different, though. Why would the Pacers front office work that hard for something that they can't sell to their regular customers. A related question, as I think this actually is an NBA event and not a team event, is why the Pacers front office would work that hard for league-shared revenue.

        I actually think their split of the revenue may be the same if Houston or the Pacers host it.
        Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
        Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
        Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
        Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
        And life itself, rushing over me
        Life itself, the wind in black elms,
        Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

          I'm sure Jim Irsay'd be all for it

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

            Originally posted by BillS View Post
            Hey, I've got an idea! Let's have all STHs give their tickets away to all out-of-town attendees for ANY regular season game against a big-name opponent! That would make sure someone comes into town and spends their money for the city and wouldn't bother ANYONE important at all! We could cram the Fieldhouse with out-of-town Lakers, Chicago, Miami, and NY fans and the city could rake in the hotel rooms, while all those pesky and useless season ticket holders could stay home and write checks for next year!
            Really?.....We are talking about a one off event for the NBA that represents multiple teams and its fans, not just Pacer players, why shouldn't it be open to everybody. And I don't believe anyone is being asked to "give their tickets away". That's like saying the Super Bowl in Indy should have been filled with all Colts STH because its in Lucas Oil, even though the Colts weren't playing.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

              Originally posted by The Sleeze View Post
              why shouldn't it be open to everybody.

              It would be.

              There is nothing stopping anybody right now from buying season tickets. BLF is not sold old. You'd also guarantee your NBA Finals/ ECF/ semifinals/ quarterfinals tickets (I probably should get on this myself before its too late.)

              Meanwhile, it was Indiana Sports Corp. that put on the Super Bowl, not the Indianapolis Colts.
              Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
              Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
              Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
              Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
              And life itself, rushing over me
              Life itself, the wind in black elms,
              Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                It would be.
                Exactly, and STH could buy them and non-STH could buy them. STH just wouldn't have exclusive rights to them.

                I don't know what prompted Bill to go off on a tirade.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                  Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                  The question is different, though. Why would the Pacers front office work that hard for something that they can't sell to their regular customers. A related question, as I think this actually is an NBA event and not a team event, is why the Pacers front office would work that hard for league-shared revenue.

                  I actually think their split of the revenue may be the same if Houston or the Pacers host it.
                  Maybe because it benefits the business owners who buy season tickets by bringing in outside money? Maybe because it can warm up some interest in NBA basketball in a community who was beaten down my years of futility and bad characters among their local franchise? Maybe because they realize how incredibly shortsighted it is to dismiss the idea because it wouldn't directly put more money their already well lined pockets? Maybe because it benefits the ****ing city who bends over backwards to meet their demands?

                  I don't know. Maybe something.
                  "I had to take her down like Chris Brown."

                  -Lance Stephenson

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                    Originally posted by BRushWithDeath View Post
                    Maybe because it benefits the business owners who buy season tickets by bringing in outside money? Maybe because it can warm up some interest in NBA basketball in a community who was beaten down my years of futility and bad characters among their local franchise? Maybe because they realize how incredibly shortsighted it is to dismiss the idea because it wouldn't directly put more money their already well lined pockets? Maybe because it benefits the ****ing city who bends over backwards to meet their demands?

                    I don't know. Maybe something.
                    So you're saying that the Pacers should be rechartered as a nonprofit and just concern themselves with providing public benefits? Isn't that the role of ISC?
                    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                    And life itself, rushing over me
                    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                      Originally posted by The Sleeze View Post
                      Exactly, and STH could buy them and non-STH could buy them. STH just wouldn't have exclusive rights to them.

                      I don't know what prompted Bill to go off on a tirade.
                      Well, your implication was that STHs would take up seats that should go to out-of-towners, not even to the other people in Indianapolis who wanted seats. By extension, that out-of-towners are worth more to the city than STHs. By extension, that it would be even better for the city if out-of-towners went to all the games instead of local STHs. By extension, we should eat all the poor children *


                      In any event, I believe the way ASG tickets are split up there would only be about 1000 available for anyone in Indiana, STH or otherwise. The rest go to the other teams, to the media, and so forth. As I understand it, that's the biggest reason for the objection - they can't even provide a large enough group of fans the tickets, much less STHs.

                      * Literary reference to "A Modest Proposal" by Dean Jonathan Swift
                      BillS

                      A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                      Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                        Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                        So you're saying that the Pacers should be rechartered as a nonprofit and just concern themselves with providing public benefits? Isn't that the role of ISC?
                        Sometimes you have to spend money to make money and a ASG could be an event to stimulate Pacer fans as well as stimulate everything else around the 3 day event.

                        But I guess a franchise don't care when they have billions.
                        Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                          Originally posted by Pacer Fan View Post
                          Sometimes you have to spend money to make money and a ASG could be an event to stimulate Pacer fans as well as stimulate everything else around the 3 day event.

                          But I guess a franchise don't care when they have billions.

                          How are they going to make money on this?

                          They're going to cover all the costs, share the revenue with the other 29 teams, and spend the bulk of a year distracted from running their own business/ team.

                          Hey, I'm all-for having ISC put it on.

                          But don't villify the Pacers for not acting like a public service entity when they're a for-profit business. (Just not a very good for-profit business.)
                          Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                          Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                          Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                          Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                          And life itself, rushing over me
                          Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                          Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                            Originally posted by Pacer Fan View Post
                            Sometimes you have to spend money to make money and a ASG could be an event to stimulate Pacer fans as well as stimulate everything else around the 3 day event.

                            But I guess a franchise don't care when they have billions.
                            I believe the initial decision by the Simons was on the heels of a study showing an ASG really DOESN'T increase basketball popularity where it is held. It just increases popularity for the stars at the game, which the NBA doesn't need the help of the Pacers to manage, on top of actually ticking off the existing fans of the local franchise.

                            But, that really can't be the reason, it must be because the Simons want to keep the billions they make from the Pacers every year locked in the big money vault on Pennsylvania St. where they can swim in it.
                            BillS

                            A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                            Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                              Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                              How are they going to make money on this?

                              They're going to cover all the costs, share the revenue with the other 29 teams, and spend the bulk of a year distracted from running their own business/ team.

                              Hey, I'm all-for having ISC put it on.

                              But don't villify the Pacers for not acting like a public service entity when they're a for-profit business. (Just not a very good for-profit business.)
                              I guess I don't know enough of the enter workings, but I'd think the sales of everything surrounding the ticket sale would not be shared. I'd think they better stock up on everything Pacers as a lot of stuff would be sold and out of that Pacers get walking billboards all over central Indiana and that can be priceless.
                              Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: LET'S BRING THE NBA ALL STAR GAME TO INDIANAPOLIS.

                                Originally posted by BillS View Post
                                I believe the initial decision by the Simons was on the heels of a study showing an ASG really DOESN'T increase basketball popularity where it is held. It just increases popularity for the stars at the game, which the NBA doesn't need the help of the Pacers to manage, on top of actually ticking off the existing fans of the local franchise.

                                But, that really can't be the reason, it must be because the Simons want to keep the billions they make from the Pacers every year locked in the big money vault on Pennsylvania St. where they can swim in it.
                                Yep, your right ASG comes to a city and nobody spends money on the local franchise. No interest in that ****ed up, worthless piece of **** team. So all the locals buys all the other teams memorabilia. What the hell was I thinking.
                                Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X