Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

    All of those whose hearts jumped into their throats when they saw George Hill come up limping say ďAyeĒ all those who didnít reply ďNayĒ.

    The ďAyeísĒ have it, motion forwarded.

    Iím telling you guys I saw our season flash before my eyes when I saw George grab his hip & limp off of the floor. Iíll say this as simply as possible, we do NOT haven an adequate replacement for him if he goes down with injury or illness. Iím sorry but D.J. Augustine still looked like a flaming dung pile tonight, I know a lot of people donít like Ben & Iím not going to argue that he is ever going to be a solid NBA player either but I just see nothing from Augustine. Now to be fair to him he would have had two more assists if Mahinmi could have hit any of the wide open shots he got him but Iím telling you his defense is so bad that it takes anything away from whatever he brings on the offensive end.

    When Hill came back on the floor my heart returned to my chest.

    This was a trap game IMO, we were well rested (probably to rested) and facing a team who has been losing and coming off of a loss. Exactly the type of game that on occasion teams just get caught napping in and in the second half this became a little closer than I am sure all of us would have preferred. But to the teamís credit (and frankly some very odd coaching from Alvin Gentry) we did not collapse and held on to win and beat a team we needed to beat. That is the difference between now and the early part of the season, we are beating teams that we should. We still have yet to master the good teams but hopefully that will come. We have a very rough couple of games coming up with the Hawks & the Grizzlies but for now we can bask in the sunshine of a 4 game winning streak.

    Itís been awhile so letís revisit the grading system tonight.

    David West: B (A to end the game but really not much more than a D before that)

    Spent the first three quarters of the game being pushed from stem to stern by Louis Scola and throwing up nothing but one handed runners that just would not find the bottom of the net. In fact he really wasnít doing anything very well for those three quarters as his defense was suspect, his passing not bad but nothing special and frankly a couple of mental errors that cost the ball. But then came ďwinning timeĒ and the old war horse just took over once again. It has to be frustrating to teams to try and guard him in the crunch because heís not like a LeBron or Bryant who will slice you with a magnitude of different looks. He basically has one move, a stutter step to create space and then a face up jumper and Iíll be damned if Iíve seen anybody be able to stop it. Now having said all of that Iíll say this I donít think he should have played the entire 3rd quarter and then the vast majority of the 4th because Tyler was really killing them when he was in there and West up until the 4th struggled.

    Paul George: B

    Solid game, not one of his killer super awesome games that he has been having lately but this will do. He really needs to elevate I think when he goes in the lane for a layup because I think he draws a lot of charges by staying low to the ground, I just wonder if he wouldnít get the call or at least a no call if he was going up instead of just forward? Good solid defensive effort as always and he and George Hill were working on entry passes during a time out which I thought was a really cool thing to watch as both of them were sharing ideas. There was no argument about it, just two team mates trying to work on a rhythm.

    Roy Hibbert: B

    Some are going to say that this grade is too high but Iím telling you that defensively he was once again a juggernaut even though he doesnít have the blocked shots to prove it. When he was in the game the Suns resorted to mid range jumpers and on one occasion Telfair drove to the rack looked at the rim and saw Roy coming and instead of going up he passed it out between two Suns and right out of bounds. All created by Hibbert and his shot blocking ability. Yes we all know right now he canít shoot, Iím not sure what is going on there but on the other end of the floor he is giving you a lot. Now on a small note here & this is where I am thankful for Gentry being a horrid coach, but Jermaine was just abusing Roy in the second half and for whatever reason he was taken out to close the game. Iím not sure what would have happened had he stayed in. Also letís make sure to point out Royís 14 boards, very happy to get that kind of production from him. We just have to hope that the shots will come.

    Lance Stephenson: A

    3 missed free throws away from an A+. Who would ever have dreamed that Lance would be a steady stable offensive presence who also turns games around with his defensive prowess? In the first quarter when the Suns were on a run Lance turned the game around with steals leading to breaks for our team. Now in fairness he did have one really boneheaded play where he drove down court and then across the baseline jumping in the air without knowing what he was going to do and getting cut off forcing him to throw a crappy pass right to Gortat. But other than that he was golden all night long. Getting in with the starters is really a great learning experience for him & I wonder what will occur when he returns to the bench. BillS and I debated that tonight & Iím still not sure where I stand on what happens with him.

    George Hill: A

    Until he came up lame I would have said that Roy or West was the MVP of our team. When I was very afraid that we might have an extended time without George it became very clear to me that he is the MVP of the team. We have a replacement for every position on the floor minus one. We do not have anyone who could step in and run the show if George went down. Anyway I think he went 3 quarters before he missed a shot and he was throwing up some really bizarre stuff. Telfair seemed to give him some problems, which I think is a pattern in fact. Not that Telfair gives him problems but it seems George does ok vs. the athletic big point guards but seems to have problems with the little water bug quick ones.

    Tyler Hansbrough: B

    In the first half he was the bomb. In fact I was stunned when Vogel didnít play him in the 3rd and then by the time he got in during the 4th he hadnít played in real time in over a half hour so while he didnít suck he didnít really do anything in the short time he played. But he really was a punch in the gut to Scola both figuratively and literally as Tyler was his typical physical self all night long with Louis and took him out of the game in the first half. He not only scored on him but took over rebounding as well. He also gave Jermaine a good pop in the chest with his forearm that caused me to grin and J.O. to grimace. This was a good game from Tyler.

    Gerald Green: C

    Meh, floated around the three point line to much for my taste. But I understand he did hit a couple of threeís so that helped the cause. Iím not sure though if I will ever be able to give him anything below a C for the rest of the season though after that dunk the other night vs. the Cavs. Iím still in awe of that dunk and stare down.

    Ian Mahinmi: C-

    Can we get him some stickum for when he is under the rim? Dear God Lance hit him in the hands with a perfect entry pass and he bobbled it out of bounds. Scott Pollard was even shaking his head on that one. Got to the line and did at least have the decency to hit the majority of his free throws. I donít know what happened when he was in there if it was him or someone else but it seemed like the Suns were able to penetrate at will during his time on the floor. Heís not a bad defender so I donít know for sure what happened.

    D.J. Augustin: C-

    Iím being generous here. To his credit he at least didnít lose the lead but other than that not much else. I hate his defense so much I could cry when he is on the floor. I know Ben wasnít the answer either but Iíd still much rather have him. I know Frank doesnít like Lance at the one spot but I swear that if Hill ever goes down I donít think we will win a game if we let D.J. get the majority of the p.g. min.

    Anyway we won, we are on a good winning streak and the photo the other day of Danny taking jumpers lifted my spirits even higher.

    Now the schedule gets a little tougher but thatís ok, if we are a good team we need to start beating good teams. That Atlanta game would be a nice start but Iím being realistic.

    Also as a side note.

    There is the P.T.O. Pacers Tailgating Organization which I know has a good pre game showing.

    I would like to invite everyone to join us later in the night for the P.T.T.S. Pacers Trash Talking Society. We meet immediately after every game outside section one right near the green trash can (hence the name Trash Talking). Weíve been doing this for a few years and we have our regulars but I wanted to let everyone know that you are welcome to come join in or just stop by and say hi.

    Anyway on to the Hawks.




    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

  • #2
    Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

    Who would ever have dreamed that Lance would be a steady stable offensive presence who also turns games around with his defensive prowess?
    Larry Bird...
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

      Agreed about Tyler. He didn't play at all in the 3rd and that was unfair cause he was just great in the first half and West wasn't good at all at the time.

      I also agree with you on D.J. I just don't wanna see him on the floor at any time because i can't watch him on defense. He is so bad at it that is unreal. Every single point guard in this league will have a field day against him. Get rid of him asap and hope the FO is already looking at alternatives. Bring back Ben despite his limitations. What is more, it's a bit unfair to lose his back up status after one bad game at New Orleans. Yeas I know it was not something permanent but Vogel should seriously think about it.

      Sorry but couldn't help but laugh how mad Lance was after watching his wonderful pass slipping through Ian's hands and going out of bounds. Lance was ready to assault him
      Lance is brilliant this season and there are still people who doubt he can play as a point guard? His vision is miles away from any other Pacer currently on the roster.
      Never forget

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

        Lance was feeling it too, got cute on a couple of his passes, but they worked, and as always, him and Tyler work well together. Really solid game from both of them. I still hope PG works on his transition game. He can stop the ball and run the floor but has no idea what to do with the ball at the rim. Elevating more might alleviate some of that as you suggested but for someone of his athleticism, this seems like it shouldn't be too difficult of a fix.
        Check out my autographed 1972-73 Topps basketball project

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

          I'm really, really pleased with the season Lance is having.

          Say what you will about Hibbert's defense. There are some ways to measure it, but its largely subjective. On the offensive end of the court, however, he is simply not cutting it. I don't see how his teammates aren'tgetting really frustrated with his lack of production. The only word for his offensive game is PITIFUL.

          Last season the squad started hot and then had a bit of a slump about a month or so into the season. This year the slump was at the begining of the year and now they've hit their stride. Things can only get better with Granger's return and the possibility, though marginal, of Hibbert returning to offensive form.


          Name-calling signature removed

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

            Originally posted by Peck View Post
            I wonder what will occur when Lance returns to the bench. BillS and I debated that tonight & I’m still not sure where I stand on what happens with him.
            Can you expand a bit on this, Peck?
            "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." óKevin Pritchard press conference

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

              Originally posted by Peck View Post
              We do not have anyone who could step in and run the show if George went down.
              Well, I disagree with this.

              We clearly do. It is Lance. In fact, Vogel has given him the keys to the team for two games in a row on the final possessions. Hill has simply handed the ball to Lance at the top and he has run some beautiful pick and rolls with West.

              Don't tell me Lance can play Ginobli for us when it really matters but can't start the offense with a pass in the first quarter.
              "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." óKevin Pritchard press conference

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

                When Granger returns, we simply see less of Augustin and Green. Lance will continue to get big minutes IMO.
                Lance is finally home. Whether he becomes our starting PG or he's 6th man, he's getting big minutes and he's here to stay. #llortontnia

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

                  Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                  Well, I disagree with this.

                  We clearly do. It is Lance. In fact, Vogel has given him the keys to the team for two games in a row on the final possessions. Hill has simply handed the ball to Lance at the top and he has run some beautiful pick and rolls with West.

                  Don't tell me Lance can play Ginobli for us when it really matters but can't start the offense with a pass in the first quarter.
                  I expect Lance to takeover the backup PG position when Granger returns. He may ultimately become a 6th man combo guard or he may one day be the starting PG. What I am sure about is that Lance will be on the floor more than Augustin and Green...and some of those minutes will be at PG because Granger's presence will dictate that move.

                  Edit: I find it amusing that a guy like Collison was considered a PG, yet Lance is not. Collison was a great backup SG IMO. I liked what he brought the team. But like Pacer management, I knew he wasn't the answer at PG.
                  Last edited by BlueNGold; 12-29-2012, 10:40 AM.
                  Lance is finally home. Whether he becomes our starting PG or he's 6th man, he's getting big minutes and he's here to stay. #llortontnia

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

                    Anybody still hesitant on giving Lance 6 mil per? He has grown so much and has been solid. We better extend him soon, trade Danny, or get back a haul for this kid. Hope we extend him. I would really hate it for Lance if he has to play the next 2 years on a < 1 mil deal. If anyone on this team is GROSSLY underpaid, its him. PAY THE MAN!!!

                    On a side note, I hate to call anyone who makes 850,000 a year, grossly underpaid. But he is way more underpaid than Roy is overpaid.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

                      Originally posted by *astrisk* View Post
                      Anybody still hesitant on giving Lance 6 mil per? He has grown so much and has been solid. We better extend him soon, trade Danny, or get back a haul for this kid. Hope we extend him. I would really hate it for Lance if he has to play the next 2 years on a < 1 mil deal. If anyone on this team is GROSSLY underpaid, its him. PAY THE MAN!!!

                      On a side note, I hate to call anyone who makes 850,000 a year, grossly underpaid. But he is way more underpaid than Roy is overpaid.
                      We he's making over 900k this year and next. But if we give him a new contract, it will add on to the end of his contract. No reason to pay more than he's already signed up for, even if he deserves it.
                      Time for a new sig.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

                        Someone just needs to explain to DJ that in this offense, the good pass is the open pass. It's like DJ thinks he has to set everyone up for a score when he's on the floor, and just dribbles until it happens. Does nothing but run back-to-back PnRs that don't make the defense to rotate at all.

                        I really don't understand how a guy can be so clueless about a ball rotating offense.
                        ďJust because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.Ē ― Ricky Gervais.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

                          Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                          Someone just needs to explain to DJ that in this offense, the good pass is the open pass. It's like DJ thinks he has to set everyone up for a score when he's on the floor, and just dribbles until it happens. Does nothing but run back-to-back PnRs that don't make the defense to rotate at all.

                          I really don't understand how a guy can be so clueless about a ball rotating offense.
                          If he would move the ball, and aggressively attempt to score off these pick and rolls, it would open things up for his distribution. Right now, teams are playing him for the pass so his only option is the high pick & roll-- pass to the big for a 15 footer. We can get that ANY time I feel.

                          I agree he needs to move the da*n ball, and shoot when open. Nothing more is necessary at this point

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

                            Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                            Someone just needs to explain to DJ that in this offense, the good pass is the open pass. It's like DJ thinks he has to set everyone up for a score when he's on the floor, and just dribbles until it happens. Does nothing but run back-to-back PnRs that don't make the defense to rotate at all.

                            I really don't understand how a guy can be so clueless about a ball rotating offense.
                            You've described a pretty common problem in basketball. And humanity. It's simply wanting immediate gratification instead of longterm results requiring discipline. Solid players are willing to make the pass that leads to the assist.

                            DJ's not clueless. He's undisciplined.
                            "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." óKevin Pritchard press conference

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Odd Thoughts: SUNshine of Pacer Love

                              Just a thought about DJA. I didn't see him play that much at Texas, but with the Hornets and IIRC in college, he was a give the ball to DJ and get the Hell outta the way guard. I don't think he understands yet that he needs to run plays for the other teammates. He is no longer alone on the floor and if he ever catches on to that, he may be pretty good. Hope that happens some time soon or else somewhere else.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X