Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

    GIVE DENVER A KICK
    IN THE NUGGETS!



    -VS-



    Game Time Start: 7:00 PM ET
    Where: The Fieldhouse, Indianapolis, IN
    Officials: M. McCutchen, C. Kirkland, D. Richardson

    Media Notes: Indiana Notes, Denver Notes
    Television: FOX Sports Indiana / Altitude
    Radio: WFNI 1070 AM / KKFN 104.3 FM & 950 AM
    NBA Feeds:

    REMINDER: Per PD policy, please do not share a link to, describe how to search for, request a link to, or request a PM about streaming video of a NBA game that is not coming directly through the NBA. Not even in a "wink-wink, nudge-nudge, know-what-I-mean" round-about sort of way. Thank you


    10-9
    Home: 5-2
    West: 6-4
    9-10
    Away: 4-9
    East: 2-5
    Dec 09
    Dec 12
    Dec 14
    Dec 15
    8:00pm
    7:00pm
    7:00pm
    7:00pm
    HIBBERT
    WEST
    GEORGE
    STEPHENSON
    HILL
    KOUFOS
    FARIED
    GALLINARI
    IGUODALA
    LAWSON


    PACERS
    Danny Granger - left knee tendinosis (out)




    NUGGETS
    Wilson Chandler Ė Left Hip (out)
    Julyan Stone Ė Right Hip (out)



    Jared Wade: Paul Georgeís Great Passing Against the Blazers

    Iíve mentioned a few times that last nightís win over the Portland Trailblazers might
    have been the best passing game Iíve seen Paul George ever have. Some
    video:


    The first three dishes shown are obviously excellent: the rise to shoot then dish to
    George Hill at the rim; the two-handed overhead bounce pass to a cutting Ian
    Mahinmi; the over-the-top entry to David West. Each led directly to an easy two
    points.

    The others are a little more subtle but also help illustrate his growth as a decision
    maker. Because that is often what is more important as a passer than anything. We
    oooh and aaahhh at the the highlight assists (like the one George threw to Mahinmi),
    but even if youíre Jason Kidd, those types of finishes are few and far between. What
    is more important is consistently making the right read and furthering the offenseís
    advantage over the defense.

    Thatís what we see in the rest of the video. Some of Georgeís passes donít even
    lead to made buckets. But they all show the decisiveness that he plays with at his
    best. Itís all instinctual. There is no dilly-dallying. He just sees a teammate who is
    in a position to exploit the opponent and delivers a quick, accurate pass that allows
    his teammate to get off a good shot.

    The second-to-last dish (at the 1:13 mark) is the best illustration of Paulís growth as
    a creator.

    He starts the play on the weakside wing and makes a flex cut to the opposite block,
    where he receives an entry pass while being guarded by Nic Batum. He catches a
    little far out on the baseline...CONTINUE READING AT 8p9s


    Donít bogart that ball, McGee - Video Scouting Report

    When JaVale McGee is on the court he uses a big chunk of Denverís possessions.
    According to Basketball-Reference.com, among regular rotation players, he has the
    highest usage rate on the team at 23.9 percent. Despite this, he also has the third
    lowest assist rate at 3.6 percent. Kosta Koufos has the second lowest, 3.1 percent,
    and Kenneth Faried the lowest assist rate, 2.0 percent. Naturally, all three of the
    Nuggetsí main frontcourt players earn their keep around the rim, finishing plays and
    putting back offensive boards, the big difference between McGee and the other two
    is that he actually spends a significant amount of time with the ball in his hands.

    Compare his usage rate with that of Koufos, lowest among rotation players at 12.4
    percent, and Faried, third lowest at 18.6 percent. (A surprising side note here is that
    Andre Miller is second lowest with a 17.6 percent usage rate thatís very modest
    considering how much he handles the ball). In short, Kosta and Kenneth should be
    given a free pass for their low assist rates, because the vast majority of the time,
    when they get the ball, theyíre right there at the rim, and the best thing to do is
    immediately put it in the basket.

    This is not always the case with JaVale, who handles the ball in the post much
    more than the other two. Examining the data from MySynergySports.com, we can
    see that in many ways the shot selection of all three players is fairly similar across
    the board. However, there are three play types which one player uses significantly
    more than the other two:


    Faried and Koufos take more shots off offensive rebounds and cuts, respectively,
    than their frontcourt counterparts. Both of these play types, of course, necessitate
    taking the ball to the rim. There is no place for passing there. McGee, however, has
    a higher percentage of post-ups than the other two, a play from which he has the
    option to pass or shoot.

    But pass he does not. This season McGee is averaging less than half an assist per
    game. More starkly put, in 13 games he has dished out a single lone assist in five
    different games, and zero assists in the remaining eight games. Itís also worth
    noting that three of his assists this season were made in transition, and just two
    made in the flow of an offensive set (one from the top of the key, and one from
    the low post). As a general rule, once JaVale gets the ball in position, he gets
    tunnel vision straight to the basket, and everything else on the court fades out of
    sight and out of mind.

    All of this might not be as great a problem if it werenít for the fact that JaVale is
    scoring a measly 0.5 points per possession on post-ups. Compare that with Marc
    Gasolís 1.09, Tim Duncanís 0.99, or for that matter Andre Millerís 1.05 PPP from
    the post, and itís easy to see that McGee still has a long way to go in getting a
    handle on the moves he learned from Hakeem Olajuwon last summer and putting
    them to positive effect.

    In the meantime, as he finds his way through that process with the guidance of
    the coaching staff, he needs to improve his own and his teamís efficiency by
    making a concerted effort to dish it out more often from the post when the
    occasion calls for it. This would result in fewer wasted possessions, as probable
    missed shots got replaced by plays kept alive for more open, higher percentage
    shots.

    Perhaps just as importantly, if opposing defenses know that JaVale always shoots
    and never dishes to cutters or shooters, then they are not kept honest. They can
    collapse on McGee with double or even triple teams with no fear of getting punished
    for leaving the perimeter unguarded. He can potentially earn himself better shots by
    forcing defenses to respect his ability to find open shots for his teammates.

    What follows are breakdowns of the five clips in the video at the bottom of this post.
    (If you open the video up in Youtube, you can jump to any clip by clicking the times
    in the description). All we can do is hope that the Nuggets film crew is working
    closely with McGee to show him similar footage and stress the importance of the
    kinds of points weíre making here.


    Clip 1 Ė Missed running hook shot

    This is one of those cases where McGee is so determined to make his move to the
    basket that he completely fails to survey the court. The first time he gets the ball
    on this possession, he does the right thing and passes out of the hard double team.
    But the second time around, in his haste to take a shot, he doesnít recognize that
    the defense has collapsed into the middle, and misses the opportunity to dish it out
    to either Jordan Hamilton or Andre Iguodala, both of whom are wide open. As a
    sidenote on this clip, Danilo Gallinari sets a very nice screen on Kevin Love to give
    JaVale room to operate. It would be great to see him set these kinds of hard
    screens more often on pick and rolls with the point guards.

    Clip 2 Ė Missed short range jump shot

    In this clip, Tiago Spillter does a good job of preventing JaVale from getting position,
    holding him to the side of the key where he gets the ball from Andre Miller. McGee
    makes a nice spin move to shake off Splitter, but similarly to clip 1, the defense has
    sunk into the paint. There are two help defenders lurking nearby ready to close in on
    JaVale, which they promptly do when he makes his move. affecting his shot and
    most likely causing the miss...CONTINUE READING AT ROUNDBALL MINING COMPANY




    Pacers
    Mike Wells @MikeWellsNBA
    Jared Wade @8pts9secs
    Tim Donahue @TimDonahue8p9s
    Tom Lewis @indycornrows


    Nuggets
    Benjamin Hochman @nuggetsnews
    Jeremy Wagner @RoundballMiner
    Aaron J. Lopez @Lopez_Nuggets
    Pierre @JaValeMcGee34
    This is the darkest timeline.

  • #2
    Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

    Really hoping Paul can show that he can remain consistent.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

      Tonight's game against the Nuggets and Sunday's game against the Thunder are going to be a real test of how good ( or bad ) our defense is. Both Teams are very solid Teams on the offensive end.
      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

        Tough stretch for Paul these past few days. Deng, Batum and Iggy, if he has another good game today he's probably the GOAT.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

          Originally posted by CableKC View Post
          Tonight's game against the Nuggets and Sunday's game against the Thunder are going to be a real test of how good ( or bad ) our defense is. Both Teams are very solid Teams on the offensive end.
          Completely agree.

          Pacers will need to focus on boxing out on both ends or this team will kill the Pacers on the boards.

          I actually think Green should start tonight. I don't see Lance being able to guard Iggy or Gallanari.
          First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

            Anyone else a little nervous about the great defense falling off once Danny's back and the offense still taking time to get close to fixed? Not because "oh Danny doesn't defend" or anything, just because it'll be different groups on the floor than there has been and chemistry'll be off.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

              Thumbs down to that guy boo.
              @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

                Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                Anyone else a little nervous about the great defense falling off once Danny's back and the offense still taking time to get close to fixed? Not because "oh Danny doesn't defend" or anything, just because it'll be different groups on the floor than there has been and chemistry'll be off.
                As long as Danny doesn't take plays off I think there won't be any issues.
                @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

                  Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                  Anyone else a little nervous about the great defense falling off once Danny's back and the offense still taking time to get close to fixed? Not because "oh Danny doesn't defend" or anything, just because it'll be different groups on the floor than there has been and chemistry'll be off.
                  I think it might be best to bring him off the bench this year. It really just depends on how he plays when he comes back.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

                    Originally posted by Eleazar View Post
                    I think it might be best to bring him off the bench this year.
                    Assuming he's 100% when he comes back, which is the point right?, this is crazy talk.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

                      Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                      Assuming he's 100% when he comes back, which is the point right?, this is crazy talk.
                      Being 100% healthy, doesn't mean you are in game shape or at tho top of your game. It also doesn't mean better chemistry. There is nothing wrong with using him like Ginobli.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

                        I just noticed it but Roy's home/away splits are pretty nuts. Shooting 30%(!) at the Fieldhouse but 45% on the road.

                        He's also shooting 61% from the line overall, which is really hurting his production.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

                          This game will be a great test. The Nuggets are a strong offensive team but when it comes to defensive rankings they rank a bit below average (17-22 range). They seem bad at defending the 3 point shot (28th in opponent 3P %) so that's something that we can take advantage of.

                          Overally, I think that we match better against the Western Conference teams because I believe that our D is the real deal. So, it will be a very interested test. It will either confirm my suspicions or make me search some more data about our D.

                          In any case, it will probably be nail-bitter. Needless to say, I'll be extremely happy with a W
                          Tonight, all flags must burn, in place of steeples.
                          Autonomy must return into the hands of the people.

                          Panopticon

                          Originally posted by IrishPacer
                          Empty vessels make the most noise.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

                            Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                            I just noticed it but Roy's home/away splits are pretty nuts. Shooting 30%(!) at the Fieldhouse but 45% on the road.

                            He's also shooting 61% from the line overall, which is really hurting his production.
                            He has been "shooting" better lately (3 games above 45% out of the last 5) which probably contribute, also his low point seems to have been when we had more home game than away.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 12/7/2012 Game Thread #20: Pacers Vs. Nuggets

                              Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                              I just noticed it but Roy's home/away splits are pretty nuts. Shooting 30%(!) at the Fieldhouse but 45% on the road.
                              The answer to that riddle may be that he feels more pressure in front of the fans and arena where he's being paid tens of millions.
                              "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." óKevin Pritchard press conference

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X