Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

    Originally posted by Peck View Post
    Well first of all your not dealing "many here" your dealing with me. I agree with you, I said after the Miami series that the Heat series was so horrid for me because it proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that two superstars can beat a group of really good 5 players. I hate it, I hate it so much that I questioned why I watched the NBA all summer long but it is what it is.

    However we're not talking LeBron & Wade here. We are talking Chris Paul (superstar) I will give you that & won't bat an eye.

    However I'm sorry but Blake Griffin is a superstar because of his leaping & dunking ability. He does not take over on the defensive end and frankly for as athletic & strong as he is I think he can rebound better. So to me he is a star player but I will not put him on the level of Bryant, Wade, James, Paul, Williams, etc.

    So, yes I will now revert to the Indiana way and say that while I think Paul is great, he is not enough to overcome our team. A team of 5 really good players can beat a team of one superstar & another star player.

    You do agree with me that it took superhuman efforts from Wade & James in particular for the Heat to beat us last season. I don't think Paul, as good as he is, can take over the game like either of them can.
    Here a thing basketball is game of matchups just because we did well against one team doesn't mean we'll do good against another team. The Clippers have better depth then miami and can be just as explosive if not more then the heat. They have such good depth that even when CP3 goes rest they can bring in Eric Bledsoe who can start on most teams that don't have an elite PG all that along with all the new players/vets they brought adds to their arguable one of the best teams in depth in the entire league.
    As for Blake Griffen we all know he is raw but he had one of the best rookie years in nba history and will only improve more and more. He would most likely be the best offensive player on our team. So to sum it up why they're ranked higher then us it's because: They have great depth, Blake Griffen who's an explosive offensive player(But is currently a hole in defense like you said and I agree but he's raw talent), and last but not least they have a Legit Superstar and the best point guard in the league. (Rose is injured to expect him to be better than cp3 would be speculating and Williams could never be argued over a healthy rose or cp3 and I disagree he's possible number 1 PG unless you believe the hilarious overrating by ESPN on him. No one actually thinks he's ranked 7 in the league and watching him play te past few seasons he has no case over those 2 but has some good aspects in his game but not enough over Rose and CP3). That and probably because they play in a much more competitive conference then we do. As for the bolded part in your post I also realized that after we lost and I was hysterical when thinking about it. I came to realize that the sport exposes an athletes ability to show how much better they are as individuals then the norm. Basketball as a sport is number 1 in terms of how much of an impact 1 player can have in a game. Superstars/Playmakers/Franchise players can carry you to playoffs because it's a game that allows you to showcase your talent with just 5 players in the court. Sports like soccer and football alow someplayers to take a day off or not step up but still win because of so many players in the field. In basketball everyone on the court needs to be on top of their game. Watching LeBrons game 6 against the celtics with calm and no pressure now that it wasn't against us made me realize how great he is. It's like boston played to their best level and will at their house but the plain truth is the LeBron is by far the best player on the court and if he wants it theirs nothing you can do about it despite it just being 1 player. He's not just the best player in that game, he has potential to be the greatest or at least play at the Greatest Level of play in the history on the NBA.

    I'm also not saying we can't beat the clippers or Heat. NBA is all about matchups and even though we have no superstar I believe we are better then both of them as a TEAM that plays like one. We just have to prove it and all our players have to step up.

    First post lol but I've been lurking with no account for a while but I'm especially excited for this season. Go Pacers.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

      Originally posted by SkipperZ View Post
      And if Bynum does adjust and new guys step up, then they'll be a beast of a team, and quite possibly better than Indiana. The bottom line is the sixers put themselves in a position to improve signifanctly better than the pacers did, and it's not unreasonable to think they may be better than Indiana this year. And that's all the power rankings are, one person thinking they will be slightly better this year
      Even if everything works out they still arent better. And since when did everybody work out like they were supposed to in NBA

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

        Originally posted by Peck View Post
        Well first of all your not dealing "many here" your dealing with me. I agree with you, I said after the Miami series that the Heat series was so horrid for me because it proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that two superstars can beat a group of really good 5 players. I hate it, I hate it so much that I questioned why I watched the NBA all summer long but it is what it is.

        However we're not talking LeBron & Wade here. We are talking Chris Paul (superstar) I will give you that & won't bat an eye.

        However I'm sorry but Blake Griffin is a superstar because of his leaping & dunking ability. He does not take over on the defensive end and frankly for as athletic & strong as he is I think he can rebound better. So to me he is a star player but I will not put him on the level of Bryant, Wade, James, Paul, Williams, etc.

        So, yes I will now revert to the Indiana way and say that while I think Paul is great, he is not enough to overcome our team. A team of 5 really good players can beat a team of one superstar & another star player.

        You do agree with me that it took superhuman efforts from Wade & James in particular for the Heat to beat us last season. I don't think Paul, as good as he is, can take over the game like either of them can.
        I've seen CP3 take over games and win pretty much by himself, I think you are under rating him, the same with Blake Griffin, yes his defense is not there yet but on offense the guy is amazing, nobody can stop him one on one, he is a superstar in my opinion.
        @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

          Just a random thought, we focus a lot on Roy's scoring (or what some see as lack there of) in the playoffs, but I don't think enough focus is paid to his defense which was elite and dominant in the playoffs. Just because LBJ and Wade successfully changed their games and added the runner to their arsenal does not dampen Roy's defensive impact, it just speaks to how good LBJ and Wade were. Roy was maybe the best post defender in the entire playoffs last year which says a lot. He thoroughly dominated that Orlando series, and was just as good in the Miami series. Miami just had enough talent to adapt to him and specifically they took advantage when he was on the bench. Which I think was our biggest need, a back up big who can at least some what fill Roy's shoes defensively, my hope and I'm guessing the Pacers' brass as well, is that Mahinmi can do that. If he can then a solid post defender off the bench is worth every bit of Darren Collison and Dahntay Jones and that was not nearly as bad a move as some made it out to be. Roy's defensive presence was massive and the drop off from him to Amunson on that end of the court was just as big, LBJ and Wade attacked relentlessly whenever Roy went out. Mahinmi hopefully bridges that gap a little.

          Point being, if you can average 12 and 10 and be the best defensive player on the floor, then that is a pretty big deal right there.
          Last edited by Trader Joe; 10-01-2012, 02:58 PM.


          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

            Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
            Just a random thought, we focus a lot on Roy's scoring (or what some see as lack there of) in the playoffs, but I don't think enough focus is paid to his defense which was elite and dominant in the playoffs. Just because LBJ and Wade successfully changed their games and added the runner to their arsenal does not dampen Roy's defensive impact, it just speaks to how good LBJ and Wade were. Roy was maybe the best post defender in the entire playoffs last year which says a lot. He thoroughly dominated that Orlando series, and was just as good in the Miami series. Miami just had enough talent to adapt to him and specifically they took advantage when he was on the bench. Which I think was our biggest need, a back up big who can at least some what fill Roy's shoes defensively, my hope and I'm guessing the Pacers' brass as well, is that Mahinmi can do that. If he can then a solid post defender off the bench is worth every bit of Darren Collison and Dahntay Jones and that was not nearly as bad a move as some made it out to be. Roy's defensive presence was massive and the drop off from him to Amunson on that end of the court was just as big, LBJ and Wade attacked relentlessly whenever Roy went out. Mahinmi hopefully bridges that gap a little.
            Good analysis and now Philly has an elite center. The East is not as easy as some folks think..... ...

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

              Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
              Blake Griffin? not only that but CP3 by himself should be enough to put the Clippers over the Pacers in my opinion, they also have a player in Butler that's not scrub, Jordan is also pretty good, I know many here hate Knick Young but the guy can score and go for 20+ points at any night.

              They also added Lamar Odom, a guy that when he is in shape he is better than anything the Pacers have and I bet if he was a Pacers many here would be proclaiming him a "20/10 guy at least".
              Lamar Odom better than anyone on the Pacers? Nope.


              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                Originally posted by OlBlu View Post
                Good analysis and now Philly has an elite center. The East is not as easy as some folks think..... ...

                Bynum is an enigma. Let's give him 30+ games of being the focal point of a defense every night before we say he is truly elite. Not syaing he won't be, but the guy has been baby sat by Kobe and Pau his entire career.


                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                  Originally posted by bballpacen View Post
                  Odd, to find yet another post where you have to be Debbie Downer... Dont know if you have ever said anything positive about the Pacers...
                  Of course I have. I love Hibbert's game and the man's work ethic. I like what I see of Paul George but he needs to keep working. West is the real deal at PF and I love Hill. The weak link is Granger but we have locked ourselves into him for life so that won't change but that is the only problem with this team that I see other than there are no superstars and that is what it takes to win in the playoffs. They will be a good regular season team probably around 48-34 and second in our division to the Bulls. I see them as a solid playoff team but not among the top two or three in the east like some others here..... We needed to replace Granger with a star in the off season to move that high in my opinion...... You can always block my posts if they bother you so much. No need to get your blood pressure up...... ... By the way, I am almost as much fun with politics and religion.....

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                    How have we locked ourselves into Granger for life? His contract is almost up.


                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                      Just start the regular season already...
                      Tonight, all flags must burn, in place of steeples.
                      Autonomy must return into the hands of the people.

                      Panopticon

                      Originally posted by IrishPacer
                      Empty vessels make the most noise.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                        Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                        Blake Griffin? not only that but CP3 by himself should be enough to put the Clippers over the Pacers in my opinion, they also have a player in Butler that's not scrub, Jordan is also pretty good, I know many here hate Knick Young but the guy can score and go for 20+ points at any night.

                        They also added Lamar Odom, a guy that when he is in shape he is better than anything the Pacers have and I bet if he was a Pacers many here would be proclaiming him a "20/10 guy at least".
                        Nick Young plays for philly.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                          Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                          Lamar Odom better than anyone on the Pacers? Nope.
                          When healthy and in shape he is better than anybody on the Pacers and I probably give the edge to Roy because he is a Center.
                          @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                            Prime West and prime Granger were both arguably better than prime Lamar Odom, and Hibbert and Paul George both have the potential to eclipse his prime in due time. In fact, Big Roy has already surpassed Odom's number of All-Star game appearances.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                              Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                              When healthy and in shape he is better than anybody on the Pacers and I probably give the edge to Roy because he is a Center.
                              How? In his prime, perhaps you could argue that. Not now though, not now. LA > us i could possible see, but Odom is no where near Roy, or several other Pacers at this point.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Espn Power rankings Pacers #8

                                Odom was a good player but he has always been a role player. He might have been the best role player in the league but still just a role player. The last time he was better than Granger, Granger was a second year player.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X