Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

    Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger
    (Indystar) - Mike Wells

    http://www.indystar.com/article/2010...njured-Granger

    Indiana Pacers swingman Brandon Rush did a double take after he heard what coach Jim O'Brien had to say.

    Rush will start the final two preseason games -- tonight at Minnesota and Friday at Chicago -- because Danny Granger is out with an ankle injury. O'Brien said he wants to continue using Paul George as the first wing player off the bench.

    "I was real surprised when I found out I would be starting," Rush said. "I thought I was done playing because of my suspension."

    Granger is expected to return in time for the season opener, Oct. 27 at San Antonio.

    Rush is playing his final two games for several weeks due to a five-game regular-season suspension stemming from three positive drug tests.

    "I want to give (Rush) a chance to be in a role that he was used in last year," O'Brien said. "These are his last chances to get to play. We'll see where he is and what he can give us in these last two games."

    O'Brien might have started George if it were later in the season. But George is still adapting to his role as primary wing reserve.

    O'Brien plans to go with a three-man rotation on the wing -- Granger, George and Mike Dunleavy -- during the regular season.

    "I'm comfortable with coming off the bench," George said. "I'm still trying to learn things myself. This gives me a chance to observe what's going on amongst the starters and how certain guys play on the other team. I'll have a better feel for things when I check in the game."

    Rush has only played 38 minutes during the preseason. He did not appear in the past two games because O'Brien had said he would use rotation players in the final four preseason games.

    "I'll probably be a little rusty," Rush said. "I should be OK once I make a few shots. I want to go out there and give them something to remember for when I get back from my suspension."

    Veterans Dahntay Jones and James Posey were also options to replace Granger in the starting lineup. But O'Brien knows what he will get out of Posey, and Jones, who is on the trade block, does not fit in with the offensive scheme due to his lack of productivity from the perimeter.

    The Pacers were outscored by 17 points during the five minutes Jones was on the court in last week's game against New Orleans.

    "We'll use James, we'll use Dahntay and we'll hopefully use Lance (Stephenson) at that spot," O'Brien said. "We'll give everybody a good look at it in the last two games."

    Stephenson goes to court

    Stephenson is scheduled to appear in a New York court today to face charges stemming from an alleged incident with his girlfriend in August.

    Prosecutors said Stephenson pushed his girlfriend down a flight of stairs, grabbed her and slammed her head on the bottom step. He faces several charges, including felony assault, which carries a minimum seven-year sentence.

    Stephenson is scheduled to fly to Minneapolis immediately after the hearing.

    Granger misses team plane

    Granger posted several messages on Twitter about missing the team flight to Minneapolis on Monday when his car was towed for having expired tags.

    "Yep. . . They just took my car lol. . . Now I'm standing on the interstate lookin like an idiot lol," Granger wrote on his page.

    Pacers pick up options

    The Pacers announced they picked up the $1.8 million option on forward Tyler Hansbrough and the $1.2 million option on point guard Darren Collison for the 2011-12 season.

  • #2
    Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

    Originally posted by Pacerfan View Post
    The Pacers announced they picked up the $1.8 million option on forward Tyler Hansbrough and the $1.2 million option on point guard Darren Collison for the 2011-12 season.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

      I don't blame Brandon for being confused.

      He had already accepted the fact that he was on the outside looking in, being singled out by O'Brien for being behind three guys at the wing position, and due to how he has been played due to his suspension.

      Now, he not only is back playing, but is the starter for the last two games of the preseason when the team is supposedly playing what it anticipates being the regular rotation. I hope he makes the best of it and shows how things could be if more of the offense comes through him with guys who are both 1) more able to pass to him and 2) more willing to receive passes from him in the flow of the offense.

      Could the Pacers be preparing for a long term ankle injury for Granger that stretches well beyond the five game suspension? Or, could we have just witnessed yet another example of Jim O'Brien saying one thing and immediately following it up with something entirely different?

      I suspect it is a little bit of both, but, to Jim O'Brien's credit, he is making the right choice by not sticking to what he had stated in the media, and is adjusting the plan to reflect the reality of Danny being injured, and is using the player who is the most capable of filling in for him to do so for the continuity of the remainder of the team going into the regular season.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

        The Pacers front office is definitely in tune with Jim O'Brien on this one.

        "I want to give (Rush) a chance to be in a role that he was used in last year," O'Brien said. "These are his last chances to get to play. We'll see where he is and what he can give us in these last two games."

        Notice how the extensions to Collison and Hansborough happened now. Hibbert was extended a while ago to show him how important he is. Hansborough and Collison were both extended and BRush is left without an extension still. The front office wants to see this from Brandon:

        "I'll probably be a little rusty," Rush said. "I should be OK once I make a few shots. I want to go out there and give them something to remember for when I get back from my suspension."

        They are trying to figure out a way to motivate Brandon. When he plays aggressive, he is a very valuable player. He is still valuable when he isn't because he is good defensively, but for him to be a more complete player, he must improve his aggressiveness offensively. I love the tactics being used by the front office. Yeah, they might have slandered him in a sense by using the suspension against him, but they are now rewarding him with some playing time going into his suspension. His suspension will not be over until after the team has to make a decision on his rookie extension. The timing by the front office and JOB with this is excellent. Set the tone for the way you expect him to play. If BRush doesn't have the motivation to look to score these next two games, then he probably doesn't deserve an extension.
        "Your course, your path, is not going to be like mine," West says. "Everybody is not called to be a multimillionaire. Everybody's not called to be the president. Whatever your best work is, you do it. Do it well. You cease your own greatness when you aspire to be someone else."

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

          I thought this was interesting:

          O'Brien plans to go with a three-man rotation on the wing -- Granger, George and Mike Dunleavy -- during the regular season.
          So no Posey?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

            Originally posted by Hicks View Post
            I thought this was interesting:



            So no Posey?
            Power forward. Duh.

            Let's wait and see what he does, first.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

              Originally posted by Sookie View Post
              Power forward. Duh.

              Let's wait and see what he does, first.
              I'm hoping we get Brandon Bass or an actual PF so O'Brien does have to do this.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

                Originally posted by Brad8888 View Post
                I don't blame Brandon for being confused.

                He had already accepted the fact that he was on the outside looking in, being singled out by O'Brien for being behind three guys at the wing position, and due to how he has been played due to his suspension.

                Now, he not only is back playing, but is the starter for the last two games of the preseason when the team is supposedly playing what it anticipates being the regular rotation. I hope he makes the best of it and shows how things could be if more of the offense comes through him with guys who are both 1) more able to pass to him and 2) more willing to receive passes from him in the flow of the offense.

                Could the Pacers be preparing for a long term ankle injury for Granger that stretches well beyond the five game suspension? Or, could we have just witnessed yet another example of Jim O'Brien saying one thing and immediately following it up with something entirely different?

                I suspect it is a little bit of both, but, to Jim O'Brien's credit, he is making the right choice by not sticking to what he had stated in the media, and is adjusting the plan to reflect the reality of Danny being injured, and is using the player who is the most capable of filling in for him to do so for the continuity of the remainder of the team going into the regular season.
                Actually I'm confused by your confusion.

                The regular rotation is Granger - Dunleavy - George. Danny's injury is making it so that is impossible to do so whoever plays min. here will be out of the normal stated rotation.

                If he started Dunleavy & George together and brought someone else off of the bench it still would not be the stated rotation.

                The roster is set, the rotation is set so it makes sense to use the player that has started in the past to fill in till the regular starter returns.


                Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

                  Originally posted by Brad8888 View Post
                  I don't blame Brandon for being confused.
                  motivation. its whats for lunch.
                  "Sometimes, when you look Andy in the eyes, you get a feeling somebody else is driving." -- David Letterman

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

                    I'm starting to wonder if Jim has a split personality. What he says is often the polar opposite of what he does.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

                      This is good... It seems pretty obvious from all of the comments and the suspension that Rush is on the outside looking in. Granger's injury just gives Rush one last opportunity to really push into the rotation before the season gets underway.

                      Maybe he will do something... but if he doesn't its still just preseason. Good looks

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

                        Lol at the people who still wouldn't be happy with any single thing Jim O'Brien has done even if he brought a cake to their house.

                        You guys are mad that he's starting Rush, but you same people would be just as mad if he didn't. Get off of him for once. I think we can all agree that we don't like him, but quit being biased and don't get mad at him for doing something even if it's the right thing to do.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

                          Originally posted by BringJackBack View Post
                          Lol at the people who still wouldn't be happy with any single thing Jim O'Brien has done even if he brought a cake to their house.

                          You guys are mad that he's starting Rush, but you same people would be just as mad if he didn't. Get off of him for once. I think we can all agree that we don't like him, but quit being biased and don't get mad at him for doing something even if it's the right thing to do.
                          It's not about starting Rush.

                          It's about him saying Rush wasn't going to get any more PT, because of his suspension, and then he does the exact opposite, and not only plays him but starts him.

                          It's becoming a regular routine with Jim. Say one thing, do the exact opposite. The issue doesn't have squat to do with Rush.
                          Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right. ― Ricky Gervais.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

                            But still, Danny got injured and DJ or Posey can't seriously be expected to start. The whole fanbase would die. It's more of a "next man up" thing to be sort of cliche.

                            We could start George, but apparently Jim has a gameplan for him and he doesn't want to mess that up. We don't want to see Paul George go 2-17. Who would we start then?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Pacers' O'Brien picks Rush to fill in for injured Granger (Indystar)

                              Originally posted by Shade View Post
                              I'm starting to wonder if Jim has a split personality. What he says is often the polar opposite of what he does.
                              Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                              It's not about starting Rush.

                              It's about him saying Rush wasn't going to get any more PT, because of his suspension, and then he does the exact opposite, and not only plays him but starts him.

                              It's becoming a regular routine with Jim. Say one thing, do the exact opposite. The issue doesn't have squat to do with Rush.
                              Not a big deal, things change. Even Earl recognizes that.
                              Last edited by Will Galen; 10-19-2010, 03:57 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X