Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

    Originally posted by CableKC View Post
    Just so that everyone can get an idea about what the cost is to take on Okafor, here is what he's owed on his contract:

    2010-2011 : $11.795 mil
    2011-2012 : $12.793 mil
    2012-2013 : $13.790 mil
    2013-2014 : $14.788 mil ( Player Early Termination Option )

    When we're talking about taking on Okafor, we're talking about committing $$$ on a "Granger-Level" Player....specifically a "Robin" to Granger's "Batman"...or vice versa. The question is....do you think that Okafor is worth that much?

    IMHO....it's not worth it given the amount of $$$ that we'd have to commit to in taking on Okafor.

    The only trade that I would consider where we get Collison and Okafor is if we swapped Picks:

    #11+Okafor+Collison

    for

    #10+Murphy+Solo

    I know that this maybe asking for too much while giving up little on our end....but Okafor's $53.17 mil Guaranteed Contract for the next 4 seasons is a bitter pill to swallow. IMHO....Collison isn't enough of a sweetner to take on Okafor's contract.
    Okafor's contract is so bad that they would have to include the 11th pick for it to even be considered and take bck Ford as well as Murphy.

    We would get Collison, Okafor pick 10 and pick 11.

    And we still wouldnt do it.

    After the new CBA, his contrcat is going to look even worse than it is already.

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

      Originally posted by dlewyus View Post

      By the way, these trade rumors, and the discussion on this site are alot more interesting than watching our team the last couple of years.
      It does keep things interesting.

      Bird steals the ball! Bird steals the ball! Bird steals the ball! Bird steals the ball!

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

        It's too early to be looking for "Player X". We are not even close to being "one player away".
        You're caught up in the Internet / you think it's such a great asset / but you're wrong, wrong, wrong
        All that fiber optic gear / still cannot take away the fear / like an island song

        - Jimmy Buffett

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

          I think Bird is gonna surprise us by making some big moves this offseason.

          I'm expecting a draft night deal involving our pick along with another trade during the summer.

          I think we'll have 7 or 8 new faces going into next season, but these are gonna be some good players.

          Again, I'm hoping for Michael Redd. I would be willing to deal Murphy and Dunleavy for him. Redd still has the potential of being decent. Maybe not a 20+ average guy, but maybe a 16-18 points a night shooter. We need a player like him. He still has gas in the tank. I look at him like a Ray Allen type of guy and very much like the Celtics. Allen takes a load off of Pierce with the shooting so Pierce can step up his defense. The good thing about Redd is that his contract is coming to an end and we can decide at the end if we should negotiate a contract for another few years if he helps us to the playoffs and plays well.

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

            New Orleans is desprate to get under the lux. tax I would do a

            Okafor
            Collison
            11

            FOR

            Murphy
            10
            Option to swap picks with us next year top 5 protected.

            Solo would not intreast them they don't need him to make the money work and this would help them out next year as well as the following years to come. I am trying to be realistic with the Idea.

            Okafor would do really well here next to hibbert he is the idea PF we are looking for. Collison is a young stud to take over our PG spot for years to come and we would still get to pick 11 to take a Bradley or Udoh or Henery. I would say you have to make that deal.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

              I just hope that they don't trade the pick to get Augusting or Felton by the way if the Pacers are trading this pick why are they having a draft party? are they doing all this for two second round picks?
              @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                A free agent to be wouldn't be involved in a scenario right? Since they can't be contacted by another team till July 1st? Is that correct?

                I ask b/c I'm sure teams who's getting ready to lose a player may like #10 with a couple of our expiring players? The Hawks may like a package for Joe Johnson. I guess it all depends on if a player would mind coming to Indiana.

                Maybe the Nets still aren't sold on Harris and a #10 package is still good enough for Harris.

                I also wouldn't put it past Bird to trade #10 and a player for a solid vet at one position, and then use another deal to get back in the draft later in the first round

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                  Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                  I just hope that they don't trade the pick to get Augusting or Felton by the way if the Pacers are trading this pick why are they having a draft party? are they doing all this for two second round picks?
                  The Pacers had a draft party the night they traded pick #11 (Bayless) to the Blazers.

                  If you wait till draft night to trade the pick, it's still exciting to hear "We have a trade, the Indiana Pacers have traded.....?"

                  Ha, I bet Knicks fans still show up to MSG and they don't have a pick

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                    The best trades are draft night trades. It's always unexpected.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                      Originally posted by Trophy View Post
                      I think Bird is gonna surprise us by making some big moves this offseason.

                      I'm expecting a draft night deal involving our pick along with another trade during the summer.

                      I think we'll have 7 or 8 new faces going into next season, but these are gonna be some good players.

                      Again, I'm hoping for Michael Redd. I would be willing to deal Murphy and Dunleavy for him. Redd still has the potential of being decent. Maybe not a 20+ average guy, but maybe a 16-18 points a night shooter. We need a player like him. He still has gas in the tank. I look at him like a Ray Allen type of guy and very much like the Celtics. Allen takes a load off of Pierce with the shooting so Pierce can step up his defense. The good thing about Redd is that his contract is coming to an end and we can decide at the end if we should negotiate a contract for another few years if he helps us to the playoffs and plays well.
                      I liked Redd at one point in time, but he hasn't exactly been healthy and he never passes the ball. At $17 million that is an expensive risk.
                      "The greatest thing you know Comes not from above but below" Danzig

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                        Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                        Any trade Bird does won't be for a Parker/Brand type player. Bird isn't a big splash type person. Conservative trades are his MO. And I agree with what Count said about whatever trade Bird does make many won't like.

                        To me the biggest type splash trade would be one for Collison, but a more likely type conservative trade would be for Sessions, or a Ridnour/Blake S&T type trade.
                        I really think that has more to do with what assets Bird has available for trade, rather than what he prefers to do. If you're trading the 10th pick, you get the best player you can for that pick. If he's going conservative again on us, that probably means the Pacers would offer a less glamorous package.

                        Now if we DO give up the #10 for a Luke Ridnour or Ramon Sessions, that's not just being conservative that's overpaying.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                          Originally posted by Hillman's 'Fro' View Post
                          One thing is for sure, IF the Pacers make a deal and plug Okafor in
                          at PF, they'll either need Rush to quickly evolove into a consistently
                          prolific, offensive threat at SG.

                          If not, they probably aren't gonna get enough scoring punch out
                          of a Hibbs-Okafor-DG-Rush-Collison quintet.
                          The only differences from last year would be at PG and PF. We don't have a PG capable of doing what Collison did last year offensively...not even remotely close even if it was garbage time games. Yes, we would lose a few points with Murphy, but the big picture is clear. Okafor would help the interior D, which was probably our greatest weakness. We had guys who could adequately defend the perimeter, but they were too busy covering for T-Roy.

                          Actually, combined with the development of our young guys, I think picking up Okafor and Collison would clearly make us more competitive.
                          Lance is finally home. Whether he becomes our starting PG or he's 6th man, he's getting big minutes and he's here to stay. #llortontnia

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                            I'm sticking with my theory that Bird will trade back to draft Hayward, whether it's Minnesota or Milwaukee. He can do that and still get a veteran in return, just my thoughts.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                              Originally posted by Mourning View Post
                              I just hope we don't end up with someone like Ridnour

                              I wouldn't be surprised to see us go after Lawson, Augustin or a similar point guard who is still pretty young, hasn't played a lot of years professionally yet and comes from a decent college program in which he has proven himself worthy.

                              Sessions could be a target as could be Flynn or maybe even Rubio (doubt it, but who knows), though the asking price for him would probably be Granger. They likely would have to pony up picks or other players though to make Bird take the baite.

                              Felton could be a target.

                              I would hope Collison, but I doubt the Hornets dealing him (but, we can always dream, can't we? ).
                              Ridnour, in my book, is just a slight step up from TJ Ford. What is the point in signing a guy who's already shown that he's not capable of being a good starter?

                              I'd much rather have a guy like you describe in paragraph 2. Even a guy like Jordan Farmar is more exciting to me than Ridnour. It's a win-win for an FA like that. They sign a short, cheap deal with a team like Indy who plays a high pace and will inflate their numbers. They walk into a starting job (since their only real competition is a 2nd year 2nd rounder who's coming of knee surgery) and they get the chance to show the league if they're really worth anything or not.

                              "Maybe Farmar will pan out and be a good starter" is a much more hopeful mentality than "I'll give Ridnour 20 games to show me why nobody else wants him as a starting PG."

                              Originally posted by d_c View Post
                              Okafor isn't abusing anyone on the offensive end. Despite being a hardworker and even spending time working on his low post moves with Hakeem, he's still not refined on the offensive end and really hasn't improved offensively since coming into the league.

                              He's been forced to play as an undersized C for the majority of his career because putting him at PF has made his team too easy to defend. The Hornets and Bobcats can both attest to this. He's just too limited on that side of the ball to play fulltime at PF and make his team effective offensively.
                              Okafor has also never played with a C who could really be an offensive threat, even at the level Hibbert can be. If you're getting scoring from the other four positions, you really don't mind Okafor being a 10-10-2 guy. If we kept Rush and did an Okafor-Collison trade, I think we'd probably have plenty of scoring. Collison averaged 18+ as a starter last year. If Rush and Hibbert can get you 12-15 each and Granger chips in 25, you're a pretty decent offense.

                              I'm not a huge proponent of this trade, but I'd vastly prefer it to seeing Ford and Murphy as starters again next season.

                              My main question is how does Okafor do defending perimeter 4's. If he can't do it any better than Murphy, then he's not going to improve things nearly as much defensively as we'd like.
                              "A man with no belly has no appetite for life."

                              - Salman Rushdie

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: Sources say Pacers are trying to trade the 10th pick

                                Collison - 18.8 ppg
                                Rush - 10.1 ppg
                                Granger - 24.2 ppg
                                Okafor - 10.4 ppg
                                Hibbert - 11.7 ppg

                                That's what those 5 averaged as starters last year. That's really not too bad across the board.

                                Okafor averaged 4 less ppg than Murphy. Collison averaged 10 more ppg than Watson. We'd actually be gaining scoring in the starting lineup with that trade.
                                "A man with no belly has no appetite for life."

                                - Salman Rushdie

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X