Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

    Friday, June 11, 2004

    Jackson stars in Suns' workout - a.k.a Time for the Suns to dump their pick.

    By Chad Ford
    ESPN Insider


    # Chad Ford's mock draft: Standard version | Slideshow version

    CHICAGO -- While the NBA pre-draft camp continued to slog along at the Moody Bible College, Insider got exclusive access to what was shaping up to be the most interesting workout matchup of the week.

    Wisconsin point guard Devin Harris, UConn point guard Ben Gordon, Oregon swingman Luke Jackson and junior college star Donta Smith were scheduled to work out against each other early Thursday morning at Hoops Gym. The workout, staged by the Suns, was significant for a few reasons.

    It was the first time Harris and Gordon, who have been ranked neck and neck all season, would meet on the same court. The Suns are seriously considering taking a point guard with the No. 7 pick, and Harris and Gordon are the two most likely candidates. It also was a chance to see Jackson, who has been rocketing up most draft boards, work out against one of the best athletes in the draft in Smith.

    Unfortunately, as these things often go, by the time we arrived at Hoops Gym the Suns had learned Gordon wasn't going to make it. He had problems with his flight out of New York, and Phoenix had to scramble to find someone to work out with Harris. At the last minute, they brought in Roko Leni Ukic.

    While everyone was disappointed the marquee match-up didn't go down, the workout still was pretty spirited. Ukic, with his long arms and quick feet, gave Harris plenty of problems.

    While there's no question Harris is quicker and much more offensively talented than Ukic, he struggled at times to take Ukic off the dribble and get to the basket. Though Ukic is just 6-foot-3, his length bothered Harris for much of the workout. Harris also struggled a bit shooting the ball in the drills. He still was shooting well, but he has shot it much better in the other workouts this week.

    Defensively, Harris did a nice job on Ukic as well. His quickness and speed bothered Ukic to a certain degree, and several times Harris did a nice job of stripping Ukic of the ball.

    The real stars of the workout, though, were Jackson and Smith. While Jackson didn't shoot the ball as well as I've seen him in the past, he showed a couple of things that validate why he's rising on most draft boards.

    Jackson's athleticism is better than advertised. During a special shuttle drill the Suns run, Jackson's time was the quickest the Suns have measured this year. That's right -- faster than quick guards like Harris and Jameer Nelson. There's no question the scouting report that he has slow feet is false. In fact, Jackson's feet look very quick for a player his size (6-7).

    His toughness and competitiveness were also on display against the stronger Smith. At one point he leveled Smith with a tough screen. Whenever he touched the ball on offense, he was in attack mode and was able to get past Smith to the basket.

    Smith also had his moments, though. He shot the ball really well, was spectacular flying through the air and finishing dunks in a drill where the point guards threw him alley oops, and he had several blocks on Jackson during the one-on-one portion of the drill.

    Seeing him in this environment was much more enlightening than anything I saw in his individual workout on Tuesday.

    I'm not sure where the workout leaves the Suns. They've liked Harris for some time, but he didn't do enough in the workout to make him a slam dunk for the No. 7 pick. This is the second straight workout where Harris was less than spectacular (he also struggled against Northwestern's Tim Young in a workout for Golden State on Wednesday). Don't be surprised if the Suns try to schedule a rematch with Gordon in Phoenix over the next few weeks.

    If Phoenix keeps the pick -- and that still is a big if -- I still think Harris could be their man. There are intangibles that just can't be measured in a workout, and Harris has them. He'd be a great fit in Phoenix and one of the few players in this draft who could step in right away and help a team.

    The workout also could end up helping Jackson. Several members of the Suns' contingent walked away raving about the Oregon star. Drafting Jackson at No. 7 seems awfully high, not to mention a bit repetitive with Joe Johnson and Casey Jacobsen already on the roster. Still, it's tough not to like what Jackson is going to bring to the table. His shooting, athleticism, competitiveness and his wealth of experience could make him the first senior drafted this year. He also may end up joining Emeka Okafor and Gordon as a favorite for Rookie of the Year if he lands on a team that will give him minutes.

    Livingston still a question mark

    Shortly after the Suns finished working out Harris and Jackson, they joined the Wizards, Hawks, Sixers and Cavaliers for a private workout for Shaun Livingston. All five GMs and four head coaches (the Hawks still don't have one) attended the workout, to which Insider obtained exclusive access. Trainer Tim Grover took Livingston through an hour of shooting and dribbling drills. Unfortunately, though, Livingston worked out alone.

    # He shot the ball fairly well -- he has a very nice release point and can do some nice stuff off the glass, a lost art these days -- and did a number of impressive things with the ball in some of the dribbling drills -- he has the longest fingers I've ever seen -- but the bottom line was that no one got to see what they really wanted to see: His decision making and feel for the 5-on-5 game.

    It's tough to get much information out of workouts like these. The most important tidbit was a confirmation that Livingston has put on 20 pounds since the McDonald's all-star game two months ago.

    The reaction from teams and scouts was mixed. Everyone was disappointed they couldn't see Livingston go head-to-head against another top guard in the draft. With that said, they also were impressed with the skills they did see and were most impressed with his body.

    "That 20 extra pounds changes everything for me," one executive told Insider. "If his body is improving that quick, it means he'll have a real shot of playing right away. That will make a big difference for a lot of the teams here."

    Livingston really staged the workout in an effort to get enough feedback to make his final decision on whether to stay in the draft. So far the feedback has been pretty positive. According to sources, it's very likely he'll stay in, and he could make that official as early as Saturday at the NBA media day.

    Livingston is one of the toughest players to project in the draft right now. Based on sheer talent and potential, I think he's the best prospect in the draft. However, given team needs and his relative lack of exposure, his draft range is anywhere from No. 4 to the Bobcats to No. 10 to the Cavs, if no one makes a trade.

    Another day, another list

    On Wednesday, Insider obtained the "physical only" list -- players invited to Chicago to take the league's physical and be officially weighed and measured, despite not taking part in the actual pre-draft camp. It's typically a very good indicator of which players the NBA believes are first round locks.

    Thursday, the league released an even more important list -- the players invited to Saturday's NBA Draft media session. Typically the players invited are considered by the NBA to be locks for the lottery. Here's a look at who got the invite:

    Andris Biedrins, Latvia
    Josh Childress, Stanford
    Luol Deng, Duke
    Ben Gordon, UConn
    Devin Harris, Wisconsin
    Dwight Howard, SW Christian Academy (Atlanta, Ga.)
    Andre Iguodala, Arizona
    Shaun Livingston, Peoria (Ill.)
    Jameer Nelson, Saint Joseph's
    Emeka Okafor, UConn
    Josh Smith, Oak Hill Academy (Va.)
    J.R. Smith, St. Benedict's Prep (N.J.)

    There were only two real surprises: J.R. Smith's appearance on a second big list by the NBA means he's probably going in the lottery. There are teams that really like him and believe he can be a superstar. After a couple of poor workout performances, we had dropped him to No. 18 on our mock draft. It looks like he won't be on the board that long.

    Inviting Jameer Nelson is less of a surprise. I don't think this is indicative of his draft position as much as it's an acknowledgement that he's the college player of the year and the only senior in the room.

    T-Mac holding up No. 1 pick

    # The fate of the No. 1 pick is still in flux, in part because the Magic still are waiting to hear what Tracy McGrady intends to do after next season. Contrary to printed reports, McGrady has not informed the Magic whether he plans to opt out of his contract next summer and play the free-agent market.

    McGrady's decision dramatically alters what the Magic will do on draft night. If McGrady is committed to staying, they'll either try to move the pick for a veteran or take Emeka Okafor, the one guy in the draft who could help them immediately. If McGrady wants out, the Magic will hang on to the pick, take a serious look at high school players like Dwight Howard and Shaun Livingston, and start exploring various trade opportunities involving McGrady.

    Magic owner Rich DeVos will meet personally with McGrady next week, along with club president Bob Vander Weide, according to the Orlando Sentinel.

    "We want to look Tracy in the eyes and say, 'What do you want to do?' No matter what the agent is suggesting or not suggesting as to options for the kid," Vander Weide told the paper. "At the end of the day, I think it's really important that both Rich and myself say, 'Tracy, tell us where your heart is, and we can work through it, whatever it is.'

    "Going into draft week, we really want to have a feeling about where he is. ... We're not going to make any decisions until we know where Tracy the person is. The pieces are very much tied together.

    "We can't go through what we did with Shaq ... in the 11th hour, being in the last year of the contract. We have to know between now and the 24th whether Tracy's in or whether he's out ... knowing that we'd love to rebuild through and around him.

    "He needs to know that. He needs to feel that. But he also needs to understand if his frustration is real and genuine. ... We are at a point where we can only change so much. We all know we can't be the same team. We got to be different, we got to be better."

    Houston, Indiana, Detroit, San Antonio and both L.A. teams have been mentioned as possible trading partners for the Magic if T-Mac decides to leave. The Rockets are dangling Steve Francis. The Pacers likely would offer anything on their roster besides Jermaine O'Neal or Ron Artest. The Pistons have enough cap room to swallow a big deal and also could offer Richard Hamilton, Mehmet Okur (in a sign-and-trade) and even Darko Milicic in return. The Clippers could offer Corey Maggette, Quentin Richardson (in a sign-and-trade) and the No. 2 pick in the draft.

    Nets, Blazers talking trade?
    The most interesting rumor coming out of Chicago on Thursday, repeated by several sources, has the Nets and Blazers discussing a possible trade of Kerry Kittles and Aaron Williams for Shareef Abdur-Rahim.

    It's no secret the Blazers have been trying to move Abdur-Rahim. He didn't fit in with the team last season and is attractive trade bait because his contract comes off the books after next year. The Blazers have been trying to pry Ray Allen from the Sonics, but so far Seattle isn't biting.

    While there's talk that the Sonics aren't averse to moving Allen -- which may explain why they've been working out several top shooting guard prospects -- apparently they want more than just Abdur-Rahim in the deal.

    Kittles, like Abdur-Rahim, has just one year left on his contract. The trade would be very interesting for the Nets and could be a sign they still aren't sold on re-signing Kenyon Martin, who becomes a restricted free agent this summer.

    Sonics not married to their pick

    Add the Sonics to the list of teams that don't seem to be in love with their position in the lottery.

    "We're not married to keeping our pick this year," Sonics GM Rick Sund told Insider. "I think we've got a young team and that, for the right deal, adding a veteran to the roster will help us more."

    Sund believes the draft is deep but doesn't see many impact players at No. 12.

    "In two or three years, many of the players in the draft are going to be helping teams," Sund said. "But I think a team can only develop so many young players at a time. We got Nick Collison and Luke Ridnour last year, and we like them both. We just need to surround them with guys who already know how to play."

    The Sonics aren't the only team that feels that way. Bulls GM John Paxson told me something almost identical last week. The Wizards are in the same boat and looking to move out. The Suns and Clippers would prefer to add a veteran free-agent point guard like Steve Nash instead of a rookie. Sources claim the Cavaliers also are talking to several teams about swapping their pick for a veteran.

    "There's a lot of talk going on right now," one veteran GM who wished not to be identified told Insider. "The veteran teams like the younger players and want to start to replenish the roster. The lottery teams want veterans. I wouldn't be shocked if the draft ends up getting turned upside down."

  • #2
    Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

    The Pacers likely would offer anything on their roster besides Jermaine O'Neal or Ron Artest.
    That's exactly what I'd do. Now, what's the most we'd be willing to offer, and what's the least it would take to get him?

    Would Al, Jon and Freddie get it done?
    Official Member of the Anti-Alliteration Association

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

      IF it is true, IF he leaves, IF he included Indy in his want to go to list, then ONLY the teams that he wants to go to are in the race for a trade, no matter what Orlando wants, no matter what they offer, unless they want to give their all to rent Tmac 1 year.

      ANY team he is traded to will want assurance on longer duration, so that leaves only the teams he desires, as simple as that.

      Kobe - TMac; would anyone take the risk on Kobe with his court case? it's not the money, it is the risk that you are left with nothing.

      Hamilton? very unlikely, even for TMac, because it would cost considerably more and I don't see the need for Detroit to replace Rip with TMac.

      (what are intangibles in that deal?)

      Rockets, well they can offer "something", but Franchise is not the dream of the Magic I'm sure and it would take a lot more.

      Don't forget that if they lose TMac they will go in to young rebuild mode, in which case Pacers are left with the most interesting roster for Orlando, and the most attractive one for TMac.

      Pacers can offer AL and JB and some more, TMac and JO are friends, who loved working together in the Olympic team, who have more in common alleged, and the Pacers are a contender, which is far more then you can say of any of the other teams besides Det.

      Dumars, if winning the show, will not be willing to part with what's needed to get Tmac, it would leave a depth challenged team in very shallow waters, with Rip and Prince they have a good chance of making the trade, but I fail to see the gain for Detroit in that.

      Al and f.i. JB add youth and talent, wit experience so are great for the magic.

      IF there is a price to be paid, meaning that IF TMac decides to leave, then I think Pacers have the best book to get him.

      I also think there are talk about these matters going on and I would not be surprised to see something happening on draft day.

      If not, then the draft behaviour of the Magic will tell it all.
      So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

      If you've done 6 impossible things today?
      Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

        One of my acquaintances at school is good friends with Chris Thomas (Isiah Thomas' son). I know this to be true because he interviewed Zeke for our school newspaper. He is trustworthy and I don't see any reason why he would lie to me.

        He said the Pacers have already agreed to some trades, but cannot announce them yet, because teams cannot announce trades until July 2. Anyway, here's what he said has been agreed to (although things could still fall through at this point).

        Pacers trade Harrington, Bender, Foster and a 1st round pick (he didn't know if it was a future pick or this year's) for McGrady. I'm guessing some filler would be needed because I don't think Foster/Harrington/Bender matches McGrady salary-wise.

        Then, the Pacers trade Artest for Bonzi Wells. I personally don't like this trade and hope if the Pacers do trade Artest, they get something more in return, but I guess they could do worse.

        He said the reasoning was that Artest wouldn't accept a position as the 3rd option on offense behind O'Neal and McGrady. Also, Jermaine was really upset at Artest after the Detroit series and wanted him gone.

        That's all he said.
        [hr]

        I'm guessing with Foster gone that the Pacers go after Dampier. And I'm guessing Dampier doesn't pass up an opportunity to play with O'Neal and McGrady. So potentially, this could be the Pacers' starting lineup next year:

        Dampier
        O'Neal
        McGrady
        Wells
        Tinsley

        Not bad. But that's just speculation on my part. Don't take what I've posted as fact. It's just what I've heard. Let's keep it to this board as well...you never know who lurks on the public board.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

          Wow that'd be crazy.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

            Yes, cause Isiah Thomas would know all the details about a trade between Indy and Orlando.

            Besides that, it was almost believable until you got to Bonzi Wells. I don't think so.

            ed:
            Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

              I have to confess: for the fun of it, I turned on NBA Live 2004, and made the changes rumored above, and including the speculation on signing Damp.

              My lineup was:

              Tinsley
              Wells
              McGrady
              O'Neal
              Dampier

              I have to confess: I loved it. Wells and McGrady are good defenders. Wells shot was money anywhere inside the arc, McGrady is an offensive monster be it shooting 3's, playing mid-range, or attacking the bucket. And to top if off, I can still dump it to JO whenever I want or need to, and he and Damp make the paint a difficult place for the other team to leave when they're on defense. It was a balanced, solid team, that I could easily play great defense with, and scoring was a breeze. I know it's just a videogame, but damn was it fun.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

                I would ask Aw Heck, as a way to verify all this, what school Isiah's son goes to. I know by the way because my niece and nephew go to that school.

                I have no idea how Isiah would know what the Pacers are doing.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

                  Park Tudor?
                  Mickael Pietrus Le site officiel

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

                    I would ask Aw Heck, as a way to verify all this, what school Isiah's son goes to. I know by the way because my niece and nephew go to that school.

                    I have no idea how Isiah would know what the Pacers are doing.
                    Very legit question, and they how IT would know? It's a small world, friends talk, GM's talk, there is no "hate" between DW and IT afaik, who knows, however it fits close to what I said here: (few posts up)
                    and Bulletproof's continued (yet unsubstantiated) talk about Ron being gone.
                    So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

                    If you've done 6 impossible things today?
                    Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

                      Doesn't have to be verified to me. Like someone said, how would Isiah's son know what Indiana is going to do? And Bonzi Well's for an all star? We could do better!

                      How would we get Dampier after trading away Artest, Al, Bender, and Foster?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

                        yer bein too logical Will...
                        Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

                          Sorry guys, my DSL has been down for a few days.

                          I am NOT making this up. Whether or not my friend is, well I don't know. I've just been telling you what I've been told.

                          To answer UB, I think CT goes to Park Tudor, but once again, I'm not the one who knows him.

                          As far as Isiah knowing what is going on with the Pacers, aren't Isiah and Donnie still friends? I thought I read in an article a while back after Isiah's firing that Isiah and Donnie still talked and were friends. Or, Isiah could've heard it from Jermaine, as close as they are.

                          How would Chris Thomas know? Maybe his dad told him? Is that possible? I don't know whether Isiah tells his son what's going on or not, and frankly neither do any of you.

                          How do we get Dampier? Mid-level exception or minimum. Just like Payton/Malone this year. Playing with O'Neal and McGrady I think would convince Damp to sign if it meant a championship.

                          I don't know. Just speculation on my part. All I'm doing is sharing what I've been told from what I consider to be a reliable source (so far anyway). I repeat from my first message, DO NOT TAKE IT AS FACT. I can see that many of you already haven't, but at least keep it in the back of your mind.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

                            Aw Heck, has your source been proven correct in the past?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 06-11 TMac to Pacer's mentioned again.

                              This is the first thing he's ever mentioned to me. I don't know his reliability. So, take this thing with a grain of salt. I called him a "reliable source" just based on the fact that he was friends with Chris Thomas and he wouldn't lie to me.

                              He went to Park Tudor until after 8th grade, when he moved and started going to my high school. I guess while he was there he was friends with Chris Thomas.

                              If this turns out to be right, I'll be sure to ask him some more stuff.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X