Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Larry Bird and the job he has done.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Larry Bird and the job he has done.

    The Larry Bird era has been underway for 4 seasons now. I have sometimes thought that Larry would be great but then there have been times where I go WTF and wonder about his decision making. (but hey I guess he is just unproven)

    But thus far, how would you rate Bird as a GM? Are you comfortable with him leading this franchise?

    Lets look at what he has done since becoming the President of Basketball Operations. And i'll note it is kind of hard to judge due to the presence of Donnie Walsh.

    2003-2004
    - S&T Brad Miller, Ron Mercer for Scot Pollard and Danny Ferry.
    Many were upset with this move it seemed. I was not. Brad was going to walk to Utah or Denver but instead we got something for him. I just wish Scot would have been healthy. Even though he struggled for a little bit he was a really good team defender for us. No star but I really liked the big man tandem of Jeff and Scot, I just wish both would have been healthy.

    I liked this move. The only complament I have is that we let Hedo get sent to San Antonio and I would have liked to have him. But I guess getting Danny was cutting salary.

    Good move to make. Better getting something instead of nothing.

    - Fired Isiah Thomas, named Rick Carlise the new head coach.
    Loved the move. Easy one to make. IT was not good in the win column. I just keep thinking of what might have been those first two years with Rick as our coach. What if Detroit hadn't gotten Rasheed? What if Jamaal and Jermaine weren't playing hurt against the Pistons in the Conference Finals? What if Taysan Prince never blocked Reggie's layup? For some reason that was a key play that series to me. What if the brawl never happened? Anyhow good move by Bird here.

    - Signed Kenny Anderson, Anthony Johnson
    Both were solid for us. They played better under Rick than Jamaal. Nice backups. I guess Kenny ended up starting.

    2004-2005
    - Drafted David Harrison
    Wasn't a terrible pick. Although DH hasn't worked out thus far there wasn't much picked after him. Anderson Vareajo maybe. Although I will say I was hoping for Chris Duhon Bird didn't miss out on anyone to good.

    Not a good pick. But I can't say I think it was a bad one either.

    - Traded Al Harrington for Stephen Jackson
    Good move. We needed outside shooting and Al didn't want to be the 6th man. Stephen had just won a championship with the Spurs the year before he signed with Atlanta and was known for hitting big shots.

    This really was the season of hell. With the brawl and all. It's to bad.

    2005-2006
    - Drafted Danny Granger, Erazem Lorbek
    Drafting Danny was an easy pick. So good job by Bird for not doing anything stupid. Still waiting to see if Erazem works out or not.

    - Signed Sarunas Jasikevecius
    I had high hopes for Sarunas. He was bad in the NBA though. I was dead wrong about him and so was Larry. Bad signing.

    - Traded James Jones to Phoenix for a 2nd round draft pick
    I really liked James, still like him. But we had/have enough forwards so it's always nice to get something instead of letting a player walk for nothing.

    - Traded Ron Artest for Peja Stojakovic
    Not a good trade talent wise. Ron is much more complete. But so much turmoil surronded him and this team. Peja was equal to him in terms of talent and production but injuries had already taken a toll on Peja. A trade that had to be made though.

    2006-2007
    - Drafted Shawne Williams and James White
    Well I wanted a point guard so bad. Still think that Lowry or Rondo would be nice but it has worked out for the best. Great pick by Bird to take Shawne. Trading up for James pissed me off. Stupid to trade up for a guy that you end up waiving a few months later. Just thankful it was only for a couple of second round picks.

    - Traded Austin Croshere for Marquis Daniels
    Good move. Austin was a nice veteran but heading downhill. Marquis is very talented and versatile.

    - Traded Anthony Johnson for Darrell Armstrong, Rawle Marshall, and Josh Powell.
    I like the move. I am dissappointed it didn't work out as well as I had hoped. DA didn't really work out. He played well but never had the impact on the locker room it seemed that I had hoped for. Rawle and Josh were cheap and had some talent.

    - Signed Maceo Baston
    Good move. I like what Maceo gave us when he played. I would like to see him play 20 minutes for the team we have now. Cheap, solid backup.

    - Traded a 1rst round pick for Al Harrington
    To me this showed that we wanted to win. We had to add talent after losing Peja for nothing but cash basically. Al didn't really complament Jermaine well when he was here the first time and we should have known this but I think Al was the best opition avaliable.

    - Traded Stephen Jackson, Al Harrington, Josh Powell, for Mike Dunleavy, Troy Murphy, and Ike Diogu
    Kind of like the Ron for Peja deal, it had to be made. This looked like an awful trade for us after we miss the playoffs and the Warriors make it as the 8th seed and knock off the number 1 seeded Mavericks. However after naming Jim O'Brien as coach I think it's been a great trade for us.

    I think this was a very interesting off season. Pretty much everything we did we wanted to get more athletic. This was obvious which after the trade with the Warriors it made me question Bird.

    2007-2008
    - Fired Rick Carlise, named Jim O'Brien as head coach
    Usually I feel that coaches in the NBA get blamed and fired way to much but this was one that needed to be made. Rick lost the team. It's as simple as that.

    However Bird couldn't just go out and hire any head coach. He hired Jim. Who just personality wise does not seem the same as Rick at all. With the players that we have this is a good thing. Now if Larry had hired say Eric Musselman (don't know how you spell his last name) I would have been pissed. But Jim seems like a great hire. And I really like having Dick Harter and Lester Conner as assistant coaches.

    - Traded for draft rights to Stanko Barac
    We will see if this guy ever contributes for us.

    - Signed Kareem Rush, Andre Owens, Stephen Graham, and Travis Diener
    I like these signings. One thing I feel this team has lacked is pure shooters. Kareem and Travis can give us some pure shooting. And they are cheap. They have struggled but I feel they will find their shots. Andre is alright, just a 3rd stringer. Same with Stephen. You can't expect to much from third stringers.

    I will say that I like what Larry has done. After this past off season I will say that naming Jim as our new coach has been a great hire. And no it's not because we are winning because we are .500 or not even. But Jim is just a fresh approach to the game. I think he is having a real positive impact. I think that the hiring of Jim can make the trade with Golden State work out good for us if Mike Dunleavy can keep up his play and if Ike Diogu can produce for us when he gets back.

    Larry had some tough times to deal with. The brawl, the trouble surronding this team. But I like what Larry has done with this team. Sure signing Saras was bad, and trading some second round picks for James White was not very smart I would say that is probably the worst thing that Larry has done.

    I'm more comfortable with Larry making the decisions for this team more so then I was before. I just hope he can build on this team and put a winning team together.

  • #2
    Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

    Pretty positive spin. I like your arguments, though.

    I wish we had kept Brad. Is there a scenario in hindsight, money wise, that would have worked?

    I wish Bird would have had better instincts for the inevitable ramifications of Jackson's bad attitude, both before he acquired him and a year or two into it.

    Same with Ron.

    I guess I'm saying that maybe we can't just cite "the Brawl" as an incident of fate totally unconnected to Bird's decisions.

    And have you considered contract extensions in your evaluation? Whose contracts have been extended on Bird's watch? The extensions of Tinsley and Bender have hurt us greatly.
    "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

      To be completely fair, this is really the only season with Larry's hands. Donnie was in the drivers seat, or was atleast the driving instructor who could take control at any minute.

      I think it's a little unfair to give him any credit or blame for the past three seasons.
      Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

        Originally posted by rommie View Post
        2003-2004
        - S&T Brad Miller, Ron Mercer for Scot Pollard and Danny Ferry.
        Many were upset with this move it seemed. I was not. Brad was going to walk to Utah or Denver but instead we got something for him. I just wish Scot would have been healthy. Even though he struggled for a little bit he was a really good team defender for us. No star but I really liked the big man tandem of Jeff and Scot, I just wish both would have been healthy.

        I liked this move. The only complament I have is that we let Hedo get sent to San Antonio and I would have liked to have him. But I guess getting Danny was cutting salary.

        Good move to make. Better getting something instead of nothing.
        I hate this trade to this day and you can't ignore that Brad wanted to stay in Indiana. His deal isn't that much more than what we're paying Troy Murphy or at the time Austin Croshere. I'm especially disappointed when I see Hedo Turkoglu lighting it up in Orlando. You can't tell me the Pacers couldn't have used Turk during the series against the Pistons in '04 or during the lineup depleted brawl season.

        You forgot the Ron Artest trade for Peja - which I still think was a pretty good deal considering. I'm okay with pretty much everything else you said regarding the other transactions though. I give Bird a lot of credit for firing IT and the trade to get Quis. Overall, he's made more positive moves than negative ones.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

          Overall Bird has dealt with some difficult times and we are still .500 even during those unfortunate circumstances. We had disgruntle players and he got the best that we could get for them. Just because Steven Jackson is doing decent with G.S doesn't mean he'd be doing the same for us. Same for Artest. The only move I didn't like, was bringing back AL Harrington for our #1 pick. Overall Bird has done a really good job IMO. I could probably think of 10 GMs that could of killed our franchise for the next 5 years.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

            Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
            And have you considered contract extensions in your evaluation? Whose contracts have been extended on Bird's watch? The extensions of Tinsley and Bender have hurt us greatly.
            Yeah I believe that the only extension Bird has given is to Jamaal.

            I believe that Donnie gave Bender, Ron, and Jeff extensions before the 2002-2003 season. I think that having Bender signed to an extension was bad considering how injury prone he was and the fact that is probably the reason we lost Brad.

            And naptown I believe that if we would have re-signed Brad, atleast to the contract he received, that we would have been over the luxury tax which the Simions don't want to pay. And if we have gotten Hedo instead of waiving Danny Ferry it might have still put us in the LT territory.

            So sure I would have liked to keep Brad. I'm sure Bird would have and Donnie too. I just don't think we could have done that without going over the luxury tax. So I think that getting a solid veteran like Scot is much better then getting nothing at all.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

              Originally posted by Since86 View Post
              To be completely fair, this is really the only season with Larry's hands. Donnie was in the drivers seat, or was atleast the driving instructor who could take control at any minute.

              I think it's a little unfair to give him any credit or blame for the past three seasons.
              I agree with you to a point.

              I think that Larry was the reason we signed Saras. I also believe that he had a big part in us picking Shawne, doing the trade with Golden State, and defiantly hiring Jim O'Brien.

              I think that early on it was more Donnie, or both of them. However later on as of late it has been pretty much all Bird.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

                If this season turns out the way I think it will... (no more injuries please) this season may be Birds finest moment. We look better each week. We could easily be tied with Detroit right now. Some tough losses to Phx, Denver, Sonics and Charlotte.
                "He wanted to get to that money time. Time when the hardware was on the table. That's when Roger was going to show up. So all we needed to do was stay close"
                Darnell Hillman (Speaking of former teammate Roger Brown)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

                  As for Bird, I assume he is making all the calls because there's no other way to judge him.

                  In truth, there are some calls we never even hear about. That is, we don't know if Walsh has been flushing foolish or brilliant ideas from Birdman.

                  All we can see is what the two headed monster has done. That monster is connected at the neck and I consider it to be one entity....so Bird will get the credit or blame for whatever happens. Call it joint ownership.

                  So far, the two headed monster has had good and bad days. I would say the good days have been more frequent lately, so Bird should get another year in the nest....
                  Lance is finally home. Whether he becomes our starting PG or he's 6th man, he's getting big minutes and he's here to stay. #llortontnia

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

                    Originally posted by aceace View Post
                    If this season turns out the way I think it will... (no more injuries please) this season may be Birds finest moment. We look better each week. We could easily be tied with Detroit right now. Some tough losses to Phx, Denver, Sonics and Charlotte.
                    Really, I prefer to hover around 500 or just above until about February, then make a run. Otherwise, you get noticed by the radar and you start to rest on your laurels.

                    It seems like many of Larry Brown's teams started slow and ended strong.
                    "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

                      Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                      Really, I prefer to hover around 500 or just above until about February, then make a run. Otherwise, you get noticed by the radar and you start to rest on your laurels.

                      It seems like many of Larry Brown's teams started slow and ended strong.
                      Yeah I remember one year, forget the exact season, but anyways we were first in the East and Thomas was the all star coach. After the all star break we were bad. Which part of this may have been the team, and part of it is we were on everyone's radar. But we defiantly were not the same team in April as we were before that all star break.

                      I think that we will end up much stronger than what we have started. Come March and April I think we fans will be very happy with where this team is at.
                      Last edited by Young; 12-07-2007, 11:56 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

                        Until Donnie Walsh is no longer affilliated with the Indiana Pacers, I don't see how Bird can be judged on anything. If Walsh doesn't have some input in things, what exactly is he still doing here?

                        -Bball
                        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                        ------

                        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                        -John Wooden

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

                          I disagree with Harrison being a terrible pick in 04; he probably had and has better potential than anyone in the 2nd round, yes, including Varejao.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

                            I really didn't like the decision to give up a 1st round draft pick to get Al Harrington back (and then having the gall to list him as a center). I didn't like it at the time and it really sticks in my craw. I'm ok with the rest of the decisions considering the circumstances at the time they were made. It's just too easy to look back at it with perfect hindsight as many do. Bird has been forced into some tough and unpopular decisions because of the unthinkable behavior of a few players. He has stuck his neck out to show them confidence and support many times only to have it shoved up his butt by players who wouldn't make a pimple on his butt as a player.
                            “It is what we learn after we know it all that really counts” - John Wooden

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Larry Bird and the job he has done.

                              I completely forgot about Maceo Baston.....but anyone else think that he would have been a solid backup Big Man that would actually fit in JO'Bs offense?

                              He can run, rebound, provide alot of energy off the bench, block shots and efficiently score in the low-post ( on the few attempts that he would have had ).
                              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X