The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

    This is becoming a recurring theme here. We lose & I come on here & say that I have no idea what to do.

    I have been saying, for what seems like a hundred times, that you just have to forget these games & move on.

    Well, there isn't that much left to move on to. We have 11 games left & frankly we are in no shape to make the playoffs. Don't get me wrong I know we will make the playoffs but as it stands right now that is all we are doing. No team needs to fear us as we are currently playing.

    Let's look at this shall we.

    Played with fire? Yes or No?

    Played solid defense? Yes or No?

    Played a well executed offense? Yes or No?

    Now let's go one further, how long has it been since you could answer yes to any of the above?

    If your like me, it's been awhile.

    So I again come asking the following? At what point in time do we say that the Coach has lost the team?

    I'm sorry but you can have players have bad games, you can even have several players have many bad games. But when you have a total failure the way we do then it's more systemic than just saying it was a bad game or set of games.

    If it was just missing shots then you could chalk that up as just missing some shots but anybody who's watched this team can tell you that it goes a lot deeper than that.

    I think Bird, Walsh, whoever has to make a decision & make one quick at the end of this season. They have to either give this coach a new core group of players to deal with or they have to get a new coach.

    My preferance at this point would be both. I want a new core group of players & I want to go in a differant direction on the floor as well.

    Don't get me wrong I still think Rick is a great coach & not everything is his fault, heck with the circumstances he's been dealt it would be easy to argue that not much of this is his fault. But no matter if it's his fault or not I do not believe the players are responding to him at all anymore.

    When you have Kevin Lee, Slick Leonard & Mark Boyle all pointing out on the radio that the team appears to be sleepwalking (they didn't say these words but it was certainly my perception particularly with Lee on the post game show) somebody needs to kick someone in the @ss.

    I understood those who said we had to put J.O. & J.T. back in the lineup just to see where we could get with them, I didn't agree with it but I understood.

    However I think what we have is that we are clearly pounding round pegs into square holes.

    This team has no flow to it at all & yes you can say that some of it is due to lack of practice time because of the heavy schedule & injuries. But guess what, good teams over come these things.

    We are not a good team.

    I was going to go on & on about what changes I thought should be made, but now is not the time. In the post season you can count on a position by position breakdown but for now I'll try & let it go.

    But I now fully stand by my thoughts on this. Rick Carlisle has lost this team.

    Can he get them back? I don't know, but he's got 11 games this season to try.

    Ok, let's move on.

    I make no secerets about this. I have always thought that the Brad Miller for Scot Pollard trade was the worst trade we have ever made in modern times. Yes, I know the Tom Owens trade for the draft pick that could have been for Jordan was worse but we would have picked Sam Bowie as well so who knows.

    Again, that is just my opinion so please let's not argue about that here, I'm just using it to referance this next part.

    I now fully believe that tradeing away Al Harrington for Steven Jackson was as bad if not maybe worse.

    Talent wise it was a fair swap. On the court they produce about the same thing.

    However I am now fully convinced that while Uncle Reggie was the inspirational & example leader I believe that Al Harrington was the vocal leader of that team & a player that was respected by both the young guys & the old guard.

    Al was a good citizen. I don't care about the "black hole" as many of you labeled him because I wonder what you think when you see Jax doing what he does.

    Al was just a good player but more importantly he was a good example of players doing what was asked of them without causing distraction to the team.

    When all of the old players were out there with Reggie did you see the one player who didn't fit in that age group? It was baby Al who was there honoring Reggie.

    I saw him & then I thought about Ron Artest & I had bile in my throat.

    Now don't get me wrong, I am not saying what I'm saying about this trade to down Jackson at all.

    I am p!ssed beyond belief that we chose Lucifer to stay on our team & sent Al away.

    As the old knight from Indiana Jones & the last Crusade said "He chose poorly".

    We chose the shiny jewel encrusted cup when we should have been looking for the cup of a carpenter & in the end our team was decayed into dust.

    Al Harrington was no false tough guy either. I have recently read some quotes by our illustrious leader about Udonis Haslem. Ahem, well needless to say the only time I've ever seen Mr. Toughman do anything against anybody was against a Detroit fan who is as fat as me who was on his knees getting up.

    Al Harrington never had to speak this kind of crap, if he had to by physical he would.

    Why am I going on & on about this? I have no idea, I'm just at a loss.

    BTW, to my friends from Europe. Saras got the second loudest ovation of the night (Reggie obviously got the biggest) which should make you guys happy. Because he has won over the fan base for the most part & I think it's fair to say that the majority of fans in there last night feel as though what is going on with him & Carlisle is bogus.

    He also hit some good shots & moved the ball along very well. He played defense like every other guard on our team played defense so don't let them B.S. you into beleiveing that his defense was worse than Jamaal's or A.J.'s during this game.

    Granger looked good. Harrison looked better than he has of recent but that isn't saying much.

    Foster looked very frustrated, I think this season is weighing heavy on him.

    Croshere came in & kicked @ss.

    Man I wish I had something better to say about this game or this team. I don't beleive for one min. though that this is because of the Artest thing, this team has deeper problems than that.

    A question for Mark Boyle, hell I don't even know if he reads my long blatherings, but if for some reason you do let me ask this. Does Slick seem as disgusted with the team as the very few min. I've heard him on the radio? From the few times I've heard him it sounds like he doesn't think much of the group. I know individually he likes the players but as a group it sounds like he's kind of given up on them. Or has he?

    BTW, James Jones looked good out there. Second round draft pick in two years for him right?

    Well let's end with some fruit.

    ahhhhhhhhhh who am I trying to kid?

    Late Edit*****

    I almost forgot the one really big positive of the night, well besides seeing Dale & Reggie, I got to meet one of my long time idols on the internet. Doug from Ohio & his son were in town & I had the great pleasure of meeting them before tipoff.

    Doug informed me that he not only is coming to the party tommorrow but he is going to be able to stay late & hit the Perkins thing with us. Oh God this is wonderfull, if you people thought I was biter about old buggeyes (sorry for Doug's sake I had to throw that out there) wait till you meet Doug. This is going to be fun.

    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

  • #2
    Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.


    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

    -John Wooden


    • #3
      Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

      Can't really disagree. I found myself flipping channels during the game, and I don't even get to see many. Jay may be right, maybe we should just get 15 new players.

      I hate watching this team.
      Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.


      • #4
        Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

        I agree. I have seen 2 games this year, last nite was one. They looked liked they wanted to be anywhere else but there. There was no joy, no spark. The suns were shooting open jumpers all nite and we had point guards running into a crowd firing up crap. Like Peck said, there was no flow, no energy. This is a team that is lost. I remember a long rebound and it came and bounced on the floor and up into the air again, no Pacer even remotely thought about trying to running it down. If there was a coaches "plan" out there, it wasn't obvious what it was.


        • #5
          Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

          PECK-Glad you touched on JO's quotes in the wake of his tiff with Udonis Haslem. They really bothered me, too. It did appear that Haslem completely overreacted in the heat of battle. I thought he looked foolish and punk-like.

          However, JO never seems to be able to rise above this and just move on. Has to get his little macho one-up dig quote to the press as we know he's prone to do.

          Just say something like well I thought he lost his cool, but it was the heat of competition and I wasn't going to back down. Those things happen with the intensity of play sometimes and you just have to move forward and forget about them.

          I know it's not a game for the faint of heart and emotions run high, but it's not like this type of response from JO is the exception as opposed to the norm.

          As far as the team, blow it up! Carlisle can only return if the roster looks significantly different because, for whatever reason, this group as a whole no longer respondsto him whatsoever.

          I'm a little hesitant to just say send RC packing, too, because I question whether we'll come up with anything as good. I can't say that I would not understand a decision to part ways with him though. Most important in my mind is significant player change, starting with some of our so-called stars. If anybody wants them anymore.
          I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

          -Emiliano Zapata


          • #6
            Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....



            • #7
              Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

              About the coach: He shouldn't go no matter what. Rick Carlisle is a great if not brilliant coach. He has proven that here over the last few years. I don't think it's fair to judge him with all of the flux we've had roster-wise. Also, who can we get that is going to be better. Yeah, yeah, we can get someone that leaves the hot hand in longer and has less iso but in the end, with Carlisle we get great defense and a great strategist no matter what. And I am still not quite sold that he is bad on offense.

              About the roster: I am reserving judgment til after this season. The 20 or so games that this core will get to play together will be enough to determine what should happen in my eyes.

              And all of this from a sunshine brigader.

              p.s. Peck, I never say this, but I enjoy your odd thoughts always. I never read official recaps anymore...nice job


              • #8
                Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

                Great post Peck. Uncle Buck told me 3 weeks ago I was crazy when I said this team was losing it. He said "have you seen them play lately." This was after they had a good 2 week stretch and won some road games. I didn't like the way they were winning - they were still lacking a fire. Now the wheels have fallen off because the intensity isn't there, they aren't listening to the coach, they aren't putting forth the effort and they are playing for their own agendas. This team needs to be blown apart. Keep Granger, Harrison, Sarunas, AJ, Foster, Cro because of his contract expiring and maybe Freddie. The rest of the guys need to find new homes. This team needs to find team oriented players. This team needs to find an identity and a leader. It has none of these things. The problems with this team are not talent related - they are team related. This group of guys do not work well together. Their styles are not complimentary and you have a supposed 'leader' in JO who deep down is not a leader but until he changes his address he will never be able to step away from that title.

                Another huge issue with this team is their durability. It is no coincidence that this group has been bitten the last few years by the injury bug. You have too many guys playing out of position, trying to do much on their own and in some cases not working hard enough in the off season. I don't see Tinsley or JO ever playing more than 55 games a year with this team.

                I think Carlisle has done a great job up until this year. He has seemed to have lost this team. The problem is that he has no recourse because he not only lost the starters but he has lost most of the bench as well. The only recourse a coach has is to sit someone who doesn't listen but you can't do that if the player you replace him with doesn't listen either!

                I thought about starting a thread asking where this Pacer team ranks in the list of alltime worst Pacer teams. I was having a hard time thinking of one that is worse than this one when you factor in talent level, expectations, experience and effort level. The 80's teams were awful but they didn't have much talent or experience. They always seemed to give a good effort though. This group doesn't. I would love to be proven wrong on all of these counts but I don't think it will happen.
                "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."
                - Benjamin Franklin


                • #9
                  Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

                  I'm still not ready to say that Rick has lost the team, but make no mistake once I'm ready to say that then yes Rick does need to go. Let's see how they respond to a few days off and a couple of practices.

                  As far as the roster goes, I said back in December that Artest was not the only change that was needed.


                  • #10
                    Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

                    I just can't figure out this team and I'm starting to question my emotional investment in them.

                    My wife wanted to watch "My Name is Earl" during the second quarter, and it seemed like a good idea to me, as long as I had the clicker and could cut to the halftime ceremony as soon as it started.

                    My Name is Earl was certainly way more entertaining than the game. The ceremony was great though, and the pregame clips on Reggie.
                    The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).


                    • #11
                      Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

                      My wife went in the other room to watch Earl. In a couple of minutes I joined her. We never went back.
                      Don't thank me, I'll kill ya.


                      • #12
                        Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

                        It is interesting how you used the term kick @ss. That is exactly what I think we need in a coach right now. We need a Jerry Sloan martinet or Slick Leonard with a hockey stick... who isn't intending to play hockey.

                        And this is something that I think Carlisle can't do. He did not originally get the job when Bird left, and one of the reasons I heard over and over is that the players just didn't like him. I think he was a bit hard on them, not real well liked, and in spite of his basketball IQ... it didn't work.

                        And by going throught that process, I think it has kind of casterated Rick a bit. If he is too strong he feels he will lose the players, if he is too soft they sleep walk. Sometimes it isn't the fault of the coach, but the players just need to hear a new voice. And quite frankly, I think Carlisle deserves some new scenery. To quote the old lady from Hoosiers "The sun don't shine on the same dog's @ss every day, but mister you ain't seen a ray of light since you've been here."

                        As weird as it may sound, I'm a huge Carlisle fan, but I think it is in everybody's best interest if he gets a fresh start somewhere else. I'd love to keep him in the organization, but I figure he'll want to keep coaching.
                        “Seventy percent of me talking on the court is personally for me to get me
                        motivated and going. Thirty percent is to see if I can get into the opponent’s head.”
                        Reggie Miller


                        • #13
                          Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

                          Perhaps Rick hasn't lost the team so much as given up on them... Or maybe it's the same thing.
                          You're caught up in the Internet / you think it's such a great asset / but you're wrong, wrong, wrong
                          All that fiber optic gear / still cannot take away the fear / like an island song

                          - Jimmy Buffett


                          • #14
                            Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

                            I just want to see Rick yell at someone. Last night on the broadcast, he was yelling something at Jack, I couldn't make out what it was, but we could use some Bob Knight *** kicking right now.

                            "Like [Jonathan Bender], AMC's Pacer was supposed to be fitted with a rotary engine--but both rotaries had technical problems late in their development (read: after incurring heavy research costs) that prevented them from seeing the light of day. Of course, both vehicles had plenty of problems that did reach production. The Pacer was a dud in terms of quality, execution and particularly styling. Make your own assessment about its bizarre proportions, but don't miss the one door that's bigger than the other."


                            • #15
                              Re: Odd thoughts about being pummled by the Suns....

                              Originally posted by Ralph Snart
                              I just want to see Rick yell at someone. Last night on the broadcast, he was yelling something at Jack, I couldn't make out what it was, but we could use some Bob Knight *** kicking right now.

                              He yelled at Granger a couple of times. Rick was not in a good mood last night he was yelling at a lot of the players. I don't really buy the argument that Rick is too stoic or too easy on the players. I think he's a lot tougher on them than we know.

                              The NBA is not college, a Bob Knight a kicking might work one time, but that is it