PDA

View Full Version : Kevin Pritchard Twitter Photo/Granger Practicing w/ 2nd Unit



a5g9
02-10-2013, 02:50 PM
I recently began following Pritchard on Twitter. Today he posted a pic of the Pacers at BLF during practice. I looked to the see who I could recognize in the photo. I know Danny has been practicing, but wasn't sure if it was Danny or Gerald that Paul is guarding, so I asked. He left me guessing. Check out the pic and his #KanyeShrug-like response below. Lol

http://twitter.com/PacersKev/status/300668322800869377/photo/1

https://twitter.com/a5g9/status/300668781682888705

https://twitter.com/pacerskev/status/300670201760980993

Interesting to see that he is running with the 2nd unit. That is, if it is Danny. Maybe you guys know.

BlueCollarColts
02-10-2013, 02:55 PM
looks like Danny to me, could be Gerald but I would guess that is Danny

Goyle
02-10-2013, 03:04 PM
That is hard to tell, I'm guessing it is Danny though. Gerald's been wearing the old Reebok AI's lately.

Derek2k3
02-10-2013, 03:12 PM
I know they were targeting Charlotte for his return, but haven't seen anything the past 3 days. Hopefully he's able to get back before the AS break, just so Frank knows what he's working with for the last 2 months.

Derek2k3
02-10-2013, 03:14 PM
And as soon as I post that:
Mike Wells ‏@MikeWellsNBA
Granger went fullcourt - and looked good according to those who saw him - in practice today. Goal is for him 2 play Wed barring any setbacks

5_7_Clash
02-10-2013, 03:15 PM
And as soon as I post that:
Mike Wells ‏@MikeWellsNBA
Granger went fullcourt - and looked good according to those who saw him - in practice today. Goal is for him 2 play Wed barring any setbacks

Yes. Yes.

Anthem
02-10-2013, 03:16 PM
And as soon as I post that:
Mike Wells ‏@MikeWellsNBA
Granger went fullcourt - and looked good according to those who saw him - in practice today. Goal is for him 2 play Wed barring any setbacks
Wednesday can't get here soon enough.

DGPR
02-10-2013, 03:17 PM
Time to prove the haters wrong!

Trophy
02-10-2013, 03:18 PM
I'm very excited to see Danny out there very soon with improved starters!

http://media.oregonlive.com/nba_impact/photo/11681303-large.jpg

:happydanc

Goyle
02-10-2013, 03:18 PM
SO STOKED

Derek2k3
02-10-2013, 03:28 PM
Fox 59 is reporting it's more likely that Danny would return after the ASB, but that Wednesday is a possibility. Semi-conflicting reports, but I sure hope Mike is right and Danny gets some run Wednesday.

OlBlu
02-10-2013, 03:31 PM
I recently began following Pritchard on Twitter. Today he posted a pic of the Pacers at BLF during practice. I looked to the see who I could recognize in the photo. I know Danny has been practicing, but wasn't sure if it was Danny or Gerald that Paul is guarding, so I asked. He left me guessing. Check out the pic and his #KanyeShrug-like response below. Lol

http://twitter.com/PacersKev/status/300668322800869377/photo/1

https://twitter.com/a5g9/status/300668781682888705

https://twitter.com/pacerskev/status/300670201760980993

Interesting to see that he is running with the 2nd unit. That is, if it is Danny. Maybe you guys know.

As he should be. That first unit is playing to well to screw it up now. He can start again next year.....:cool: ...

Heisenberg
02-10-2013, 03:32 PM
And as soon as I post that:
Mike Wells ‏@MikeWellsNBA
Granger went fullcourt - and looked good according to those who saw him - in practice today. Goal is for him 2 play Wed barring any setbacks

http://assets0.ordienetworks.com/images/GifGuide/dancing/pr2.gif

Hicks
02-10-2013, 03:45 PM
So it sounds like, barring setbacks, Danny Granger will be in uniform either on Wednesday, February 13th, vs. Charlotte or on Wednesday, February 20th, vs. New York.

Derek2k3
02-10-2013, 03:51 PM
So it sounds like, barring setbacks, Danny Granger will be in uniform either on Wednesday, February 13th, vs. Charlotte or on Wednesday, February 20th, vs. New York.

Mwahahahahaha

http://i.imgflip.com/kvog.gif

rel
02-10-2013, 04:04 PM
Mwahahahahaha

http://i.imgflip.com/kvog.gif

bahh, I miss me some Granger

Derek2k3
02-10-2013, 04:11 PM
bahh, I miss me some Granger

I hope he's back Wednesday so we can showcase him and maybe get a backup 4 and a second round pick before the trade deadline

TMJ31
02-10-2013, 05:01 PM
Mwahahahahaha

http://i.imgflip.com/kvog.gif


As a Packers fan, this SHOULD annoy me.

But as it was a direct dig at Novak, I fully support it :P

Although I have to admit, Danny's Discount Double Check form is very poor.

a5g9
02-10-2013, 05:07 PM
Although I have to admit, Danny's Discount Double Check form is very poor.

Very poor! Lol

LetsTalkPacers84
02-10-2013, 05:16 PM
I assume the worst but hope for the best.

granger4mvp
02-10-2013, 05:21 PM
Dang it was hoping for tommorrow oh well

Peck
02-10-2013, 05:25 PM
I'm just going to enjoy whatever time we have left with Danny.

I know to a lot of people he was never good enough, which believe me I understand.

But to some of us he was the toilet bowl cleaner after we flushed the sewage of those early aught teams. He was/is a good player, he has never embarrassed the franchise (well unless you count the Dead Donkey thing, but I think they learned early on to keep him off of twitter) and frankly brought back an interaction with the common fan that had been missing for a long time.

Does he have his faults? Yes.

Was he ever good enough? Depends on your point of view, I say at the 17th pick he has been far more than good enough. But I understand when you are looking to build around a franchise player he isn't LeBron, Durrant or even as good as a Pierce.

He played for a horrid God awful coach and suffered through teams that did not have the talent to compete and this is where I think some of us really value Danny. He could have left, he did not have to sign that contract extension. Would he have gotten as big a contract elsewhere? I don't know but this was a 20+ point a game scorer (who btw after signing his contract had a bigger year) so I'm telling you several winning clubs would have done something to get him. But he didn't he had a hand shake agreement with Larry and was in on the "three year plan". That is why I am very worried with Pritchard at the helm as a Danny fan.

IMO, if Bird were here Danny is untouchable. Not because of his on court value only but because I believe they had an agreement that if Danny stayed here during the tough times Larry would build a team with him (notice I didn't say around him) to compete.

Pritchard is under no such obligation. Which btw I'm not faulting him for, he has to do what is best for the club.

So anyway as a fan of the Pacers first but then also of Danny as a Pacer I am just going to try & enjoy whatever we have left with him. If it's this season, next season or even his career. I just want to enjoy Danny being on the team.

Day-V
02-10-2013, 05:54 PM
As a Packers fan, this SHOULD annoy me.

As a guy who used to like Pro Wrestling, Rodgers trying to claim the move his own SHOULD annoy me. ;)

Peck
02-10-2013, 05:59 PM
As a guy who used to like Pro Wrestling, Rodgers trying to claim the move his own SHOULD annoy me. ;)

Not to mention boxer or MMA fighter fan.

sportfireman
02-10-2013, 06:03 PM
Is it Wed. yet?

Will Galen
02-10-2013, 07:05 PM
It's probably Granger, and they are putting in some plays for him, why else would they close the blinds to the street windows?

presto123
02-10-2013, 07:55 PM
Probably going to be weird and maybe a little scary for Danny to return after all this time off. I've been down with runner's knee for 6 months now and when I am able to return to running I'm sure I will be a little worried that the knee pain will come back again. Here's hoping all goes smooth for Danny.

Sookie
02-10-2013, 07:57 PM
I'm just going to enjoy whatever time we have left with Danny.

I know to a lot of people he was never good enough, which believe me I understand.

But to some of us he was the toilet bowl cleaner after we flushed the sewage of those early aught teams. He was/is a good player, he has never embarrassed the franchise (well unless you count the Dead Donkey thing, but I think they learned early on to keep him off of twitter) and frankly brought back an interaction with the common fan that had been missing for a long time.

Does he have his faults? Yes.

Was he ever good enough? Depends on your point of view, I say at the 17th pick he has been far more than good enough. But I understand when you are looking to build around a franchise player he isn't LeBron, Durrant or even as good as a Pierce.

He played for a horrid God awful coach and suffered through teams that did not have the talent to compete and this is where I think some of us really value Danny. He could have left, he did not have to sign that contract extension. Would he have gotten as big a contract elsewhere? I don't know but this was a 20+ point a game scorer (who btw after signing his contract had a bigger year) so I'm telling you several winning clubs would have done something to get him. But he didn't he had a hand shake agreement with Larry and was in on the "three year plan". That is why I am very worried with Pritchard at the helm as a Danny fan.

IMO, if Bird were here Danny is untouchable. Not because of his on court value only but because I believe they had an agreement that if Danny stayed here during the tough times Larry would build a team with him (notice I didn't say around him) to compete.

Pritchard is under no such obligation. Which btw I'm not faulting him for, he has to do what is best for the club.

So anyway as a fan of the Pacers first but then also of Danny as a Pacer I am just going to try & enjoy whatever we have left with him. If it's this season, next season or even his career. I just want to enjoy Danny being on the team.

As much as I understand that Pritchard doesn't have the obligation, I hope he does the right thing. And the right thing is keeping Danny around. Perhaps this type of situation is why I tend to side with players. So much loyalty is expected of them, with very little given back from management and owners. Danny gave up what was probably the best years of his career to play for JOB...and now that we finally have a great team, he's suddenly disposable.

What's sad though, is how many fans are advocating trading away Danny.

I can't wait to see Danny on the court. He's sure to help us.

graphic-er
02-10-2013, 10:47 PM
THis is gonna be great! Can't wait to wear my Granger Jersey On Wednesday.

graphic-er
02-10-2013, 10:49 PM
What's sad though, is how many fans are advocating trading away Danny.

I can't wait to see Danny on the court. He's sure to help us.

Thats because most people in Indianapolis didn't bother to watch the Miami series where the team totally wilted once Granger got taken out by Lebron.

The Future
02-10-2013, 11:47 PM
Thats because most people in Indianapolis didn't bother to watch the Miami series where the team totally wilted once Granger got taken out by Lebron.

And this is why we need him now with Paul George much improved offensively compared to last playoffs.

I know Wade is a good defender, but I still think its a mismatch if he had to guard George or Granger, too much size. These guys can shoot over Wade with ease.

vnzla81
02-11-2013, 12:22 AM
As much as I understand that Pritchard doesn't have the obligation, I hope he does the right thing. And the right thing is keeping Danny around. Perhaps this type of situation is why I tend to side with players. So much loyalty is expected of them, with very little given back from management and owners. Danny gave up what was probably the best years of his career to play for JOB...and now that we finally have a great team, he's suddenly disposable.

What's sad though, is how many fans are advocating trading away Danny.

I can't wait to see Danny on the court. He's sure to help us.

Peyton Manning was loyal to the Colts and they still let him go to another team because it was the best for the team and him, you need to understand that sometimes teams need to make hard decisions, just because somebody is "loyal"(while receiving a huge pay check by the way) doesn't mean that the team has to keep this player on the team forever. :twocents:

Heisenberg
02-11-2013, 12:24 AM
Peyton Manning was loyal to the Colts and they still let him go to another team because it was the best for the team and him, you need to understand that sometimes teams need to make hard decisions, just because somebody is "loyal"(while receiving a huge pay check by the way) doesn't mean that the team has to keep this player on the team forever. :twocents:

You're really misrepresenting Manning's departure. He was let go because he was due $18 million (something like that) before the Colts knew if he could ever even play again.

Derek2k3
02-11-2013, 12:36 AM
You're really misrepresenting Manning's departure. He was let go because he was due $18 million (something like that) before the Colts knew if he could ever even play again.

While that is very true, he was still cut. According to Peter King, Peyton was pretty shook/shocked when it happened.

vnzla81
02-11-2013, 12:37 AM
You're really misrepresenting Manning's departure. He was let go because he was due $18 million (something like that) before the Colts knew if he could ever even play again.

And because they had the first round pick with a guy called Andrew luck waiting to be the starter, had the Colts been "loyal" as some are suggesting the Colts would have pay the guy 18mil to keep him on the bench even if he was not healthy.

I still remember people wanting to pay Foster 10+mil a year because he was "loyal" and because of "his locker room leadership".

I guess what I'm trying to say is that "loyalty" in sports is bs from both sides and suggesting to keep a player because of his "loyalty" is not good business.

Peck
02-11-2013, 12:51 AM
And because they had the first round pick with a guy called Andrew luck waiting to be the starter, had the Colts been "loyal" as some are suggesting the Colts would have pay the guy 18mil to keep him on the bench even if he was not healthy.

I still remember people wanting to pay Foster 10+mil a year because he was "loyal" and because of "his locker room leadership".

I guess what I'm trying to say is that "loyalty" in sports is bs from both sides and suggesting to keep a player because of his "loyalty" is not good business.

I hate this thinking, but I can't disagree with it either.

Vnzla81 is correct in the fact that it is a business and at the end of the day you do have to make the best choices for either the business or from the other side the player.

Doesn't mean I have to like it or can't believe that it can't be moderated but at the end of the day it is the bottom line.

mattie
02-11-2013, 01:12 AM
Loyalty can be rewarded for both sides though.

I hate how much players get lambasted for not being loyal which is ridiucous. They have to handle their career. But I appreciate it when both teams and players are loyal. Teams can get a reputation for being loyal, which I think can help in the long term success of the program. And this is true in all business whether it is basketball, or any other job in the country really.

mattie
02-11-2013, 01:12 AM
I hope Danny's loyalty is rewarded and if it is, I'm sure the Pacers loyalty will be rewarded in the future.

Hicks
02-11-2013, 01:22 AM
Loyalty exists or at least existed in sports, it's just not mandatory.

Heisenberg
02-11-2013, 01:29 AM
Loyalty exists or at least existed in sports, it's just not mandatory.
Just ask Reggie. A big reason he never signed with the Celtics was not wanting to wear another uniform.


Looking back, Miller has never been clear on the reason he turned down the job offer – except that he had come to the cusp of accepting it. Even now, Ainge isn’t sure. Miller declined to discuss it, but [Mark] Jackson never believed it was because Miller couldn’t still play, or that the desire was gone.

“It was not wanting to wear another uniform, and not wanting to feel like somebody else got him a ring,” Jackson says.

To his core, Miller had such deep love and loyalty to those 18 years with the Indiana Pacers (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/teams/ind/). The Celtics hadn’t been the first team to offer him a chance to return to the NBA. Mark Cuban called him to play with Dirk Nowitzki (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3252/). Cleveland Cavaliers (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/teams/cle/) GM Danny Ferry wanted him to play with LeBron James (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3704/). To Miller, it never felt right for his legacy. He did the rare thing: He retired when he was still an outstanding player, and he couldn’t be lured back when Mark Jackson and Garnett were working out with him, telling him he still could make a difference.



http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-millerallen020911

Is it romanticized too much, sort of a naive way of feeling like we don't just root for laundry? Probably. But when it really happens it's great.

PaceBalls
02-11-2013, 01:30 AM
There is something to be said for loyalty. Guys don't want to come to Indiana because of the weather or the great night life... but they might want to play for a top notch organization that takes care of their own players above and beyond.

NapTonius Monk
02-11-2013, 01:36 AM
Making a move that goes against sentiment doesn't mean that a team is disloyal. Not all the time.

Nuntius
02-11-2013, 04:53 AM
Peyton Manning was loyal to the Colts and they still let him go to another team because it was the best for the team and him, you need to understand that sometimes teams need to make hard decisions, just because somebody is "loyal"(while receiving a huge pay check by the way) doesn't mean that the team has to keep this player on the team forever. :twocents:

Those are different situations, though. Letting Danny go is not for the best of the team or him.

wintermute
02-11-2013, 06:10 AM
I guess what I'm trying to say is that "loyalty" in sports is bs from both sides and suggesting to keep a player because of his "loyalty" is not good business.

I don't often agree with vnzla, but can't argue with this.



I hate how much players get lambasted for not being loyal which is ridiucous. They have to handle their career. But I appreciate it when both teams and players are loyal. Teams can get a reputation for being loyal, which I think can help in the long term success of the program. And this is true in all business whether it is basketball, or any other job in the country really.

Agreed with this too. Still, you can show loyalty in a lot of ways that don't affect the competitiveness of the team on the floor.

It seems inevitable to me that we're going to lose at least one guy from our current core, and for various reasons Danny seems the most likely candidate.

MvPlumlee
02-11-2013, 08:02 AM
Man, I would love to witness a short practice game between our first and second unit.
George against Granger. West against Hansbrough. drool smiley

No wonder Hibbert is struggling like that. Switching from Amundson to Mahinmi, that must hurt your confidence :-p

pacers74
02-11-2013, 08:54 AM
Can't wait! We will be at the game wed. too. I got a great deal on some tickets. My son will be sporting his Granger Jersey.

Sookie
02-11-2013, 12:19 PM
Peyton Manning was loyal to the Colts and they still let him go to another team because it was the best for the team and him, you need to understand that sometimes teams need to make hard decisions, just because somebody is "loyal"(while receiving a huge pay check by the way) doesn't mean that the team has to keep this player on the team forever. :twocents:

There's a difference between the Manning situation and this one.

First of all, it is not in Danny's best interest to be traded, and it's likely not even in the Pacers best interest.
Second, Danny has never been rewarded for his loyalty here. What he got was JOB.

It's obviously not mandatory. And Sports is a business. But in general, it's bad business to treat your employees like they are disposable. (For instance, Paul George could look at the way Danny was treated, and decide he'd rather go back to LA for a more high profile team instead of giving up his best years in Indiana. And the Pacers would deserve it.) And this talk of trading him before he even plays with the team is even more pathetic.

vnzla81
02-11-2013, 12:34 PM
There's a difference between the Manning situation and this one.

Of course there is Payton Manning was the GOAT.


First of all, it is not in Danny's best interest to be traded, and it's likely not even in the Pacers best interest.

How do you know that is not in his best interest?


Second, Danny has never been rewarded for his loyalty here. What he got was JOB.

How much more reward do you want from a team than a 13mil a year salary?


It's obviously not mandatory. And Sports is a business. But in general, it's bad business to treat your employees like they are disposable. (For instance, Paul George could look at the way Danny was treated, and decide he'd rather go back to LA for a more high profile team instead of giving up his best years in Indiana. And the Pacers would deserve it.) And this talk of trading him before he even plays with the team is even more pathetic.

Players know they are disposable that is why they don't give a damn about their teams either, I mean how much more "loyalty" have the Pacers show Roy and he was ready to sign with other team? "loyalty" is nice an all but in reality that doesn't work.

Since86
02-11-2013, 01:19 PM
I don't think players know they're disposable. That's why they get all touchy when they're names are involved in trade rumors. There's always players who make comments about how hard it is on them and their families to pick up move.

They want the luxury of being able to pick and choose where they play, but don't like the organizations to have the power to make that decision for them. It's a two way street, players don't like to get traded (unless they ask) and teams don't like to get jilted.

Since86
02-12-2013, 04:45 PM
Scott Agnes and MJB both tweeted pictures of Danny getting some run today. (sorry, can't post them from work)


Danny looks pretty thin. Looks like he kept himself in really good shape over the down time.

Heisenberg
02-12-2013, 04:54 PM
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Employee #33 closing in on his first playing time of the season. I have no idea when that might be, so don't ask. <a href="http://t.co/uW2aL0JM" title="http://twitter.com/Mark_J_Boyle/status/301413284756729856/photo/1">twitter.com/Mark_J_Boyle/s…</a></p>&mdash; Mark Boyle (@Mark_J_Boyle) <a href="https://twitter.com/Mark_J_Boyle/status/301413284756729856">February 12, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Granger still declined all media requests but Vogel said DG looked good, did the most he's done to this point &amp; a decision will be made n AM</p>&mdash; Scott Agness (@ScottAgness) <a href="https://twitter.com/ScottAgness/status/301420955622838272">February 12, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Danny Granger (@<a href="https://twitter.com/dgranger33">dgranger33</a>) participates in full-court play with no problem. <a href="http://t.co/frYKuOgu" title="http://instagr.am/p/VpIt4rl5UM/">instagr.am/p/VpIt4rl5UM/</a></p>&mdash; Scott Agness (@ScottAgness) <a href="https://twitter.com/ScottAgness/status/301413960379404288">February 12, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Does look kinda skinny, could just be the leggings

Trader Joe
02-12-2013, 04:56 PM
Yesterday Seth and I were sitting behind the P's bench and when Danny came out at half time to sit on the bench as the team was warming up, we both started yelling and I said "See you Wednesday Danny!" And he looked at us, smiled, and gave a slight nod and point. I don't think there's any decision to be made. He will go.

vnzla81
02-12-2013, 05:02 PM
Yesterday Seth and I were sitting behind the P's bench and when Danny came out at half time to sit on the bench as the team was warming up, we both started yelling and I said "See you Wednesday Danny!" And he looked at us, smiled, and gave a slight nod and point. I don't think there's any decision to be made. He will go.

Damn groupies ..... ;)

Trader Joe
02-12-2013, 05:04 PM
Damn groupies ..... ;)

He signed my belly after the game.

vnzla81
02-12-2013, 05:33 PM
@MikeWellsNBA: And before u ask, a decision on Granger playing tomorrow won't be determined until tomorrow to see how he responds from today's practice

Sollozzo
02-12-2013, 06:02 PM
Looks like we won't know until the last minute. It will be an interesting day on here tomorrow.