Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

    As May enters its final day, it is time to look at this year’s second draft profile, the mammoth center from Syracuse, Fab Melo. Checking in at a legitimate 7’0 and 275lbs or so, Melo is one of the few legitimate pure 5men in this draft, which makes him a valuable commodity in today’s size challenged NBA landscape. He also has long arms, measuring out a wing span of 7’3.Melo’s pure physical attributes will make him a much studied and talked aboutplayer as we go through this year’s draft process. Melo will turn just 22 years old on June 20, coming out to the league after a somewhat controversial sophomore year.

    Playing for the Syracuse Orangemen brings with it both good and bad points. On the plus side, no one outside of Kentucky played in more biggames or marquee matchups than did Syracuse. Ranked in the top or near the topof the polls all year, and competing in the rugged Big East Conference, Melohad many prime time games to make his game well known to the casual collegebasketball fans everywhere.

    On the negative side, Syracuse plays such an unorthodoxdefensive style in their “bump 2-3” zone, that you didn’t often get to see Melo in a lot of realistic NBA defensive situations. Playing the middle backline of their zone, Melo was the ultimate rim protector, rarely stepping outside of thepainted area defensively, rarely being screened or having to defend theballscreen/pick and pop game that is so popular in the NBA today. So, most ofthe scouting analysis you have to do with Fab Melo defensively is projectionand guesswork, rather than hard film evidence.

    Of course, making projections iswhat coaches and scouts do, so without further ado let’s put the game of the young big man under the microscope:


    Melo, like most big men, is going to probably be a late developer offensively. Right now healmost totally is a “right hand/left shoulder” guy inside when he catches theball with his back to the basket. While at 7’0 and strong he can get off a nice right handed jump hook, he takes a long time to load up hs shot and is pretty predictable and easy to guard, since 95% of the time you know which way he will turn as a defender. He also occasionally makes a full turn and tries a turnaround jumper inside turning to his left, but he doesn’t get much elevation and isn’t very accurate doing it. Right now, his one NBA move is the right hand jump hook, other than he doesn’t have much. Melo has never been and likely never will be a primary scoring option for a team with his back to the rim, but then again, he doesn’t really have to be to have a long NBA career. But if he wants to be legitimately a really good player, he will have to spend a lot of hoursin a gym getting his basic inside moves down offensively. A team that picks Melo needs to be prepared to have a good big man coach work with him and develop him.

    Like all raw big men, Melo doesn’t always play with good balance inside, and he plays too upright when trying to establish position. Now in college he is so big and strong it didn’t matter much, but in the NBA he will have to learn how to “sink his hips” inside so he can lower his center of gravity and establish and hold his spot.

    One thing I do like about Melo is that he seems tounderstand and embrace the fact that he is big. They may sound silly to some of you, but as coaches you see so many big guys play like they wish they were guards, always looking to drift outaway from traffic and make little finesse type plays on the perimeter. Melo isn’t that way, instead he truly knows where he lives, which is about 5 feet from the front of the rim.

    He has some mobility as a ball screener, then rolling to the rim for lobs and dunks. In fact, when he catches the ball facing the basketclose enough where he doesn’t have to dribble (Melo can’t dribble at all), heis a pretty good finisher. While not a high flier, he can still go dunk with authority and finish thru contact, which is nice to see….he doesn’t avoid or shy away from contact like so many young bigs do.

    His big offensive weakness that I see is that he brings the ball down too low most of the time, and lets guards “dig” at him hard and steal it from him. Instead of embracing the double team and calmly passing out of it to an open teammate, often times he panics, gets off balance, brings the ball low and gets turned over. He gets a little spastic with the ball in traffic sometimes, so whoever his teammates are will need to be careful not to put him in bad spots offensively, as he has only limited capabilities with the ball at this time.

    I do think though that by age 27 or so that Melo has the potential to develop some offensively. Big guys need time, and whichever fanbase and coaching staff ends up with him needs to be willing to develop him slowly, as he does need a lot of offensive work.However, the material is there to work with, and I see him eventually being adecent enough offensive player, though likely a 4th or 5thoption on the floor when he is playing. He also should eventually be one hell of a screener, as he is agile enough, mean enough, and tough enough to do that if asked.

    I also think he likely would be better in a slightly slower paced system, as he is not nearly athletic enough to run up and down the floor at this time. But since I think he will be a shorter spurts type of guy, I wouldn’t shoehorn him to only playing on the slowdown teams totally just yet. I think he can be in play for just about every team in the league with some patience and a good developmental staff.



    Defensively is where he can make a difference I believe.More than anything, Melo likes playing defense, and seems to understand that it is on that end where he can make his money. Melo was the defensive player ofthe year in the Big East Conference, mainly due to his ability to block and alter shots, as he averaged almost 3 blocks a game and altered many many more.

    Now, he did this in the context of the Syracuse 2-3 zone,which put him right in front of the rim and enabled him to always play facing the basketball, so he could see things develop in front of him. Opponents did what they could to spread Syracuse out, but Melo was good enough of a rim protectorthat the Orange could afford to funnel guys to Melo, with the faith that they wouldn’t score much against him. Even more importantly, Melo showed enough savvy and smarts to not foul a lot, and even drew some charges against out of control drivers, something you rarely see a young 7 footer do. So many times you see young bigs jump and try to block everything, but Melo was judicious and smart, only going after shots when it was appropriate usually.

    This was hard to see on tape, but appeared to me that Melo was a really good defensive communicator back there as well, yelling out things he saw to his teammates as the sort of defensive captain that he was. I saw alot of pointing out of him, normally a good sign for someone in the back part of a zone.

    The problem of course is this: playing NBA man to mandefense takes a lot of different skills than playing the back end of a college zone. So trying to figure out how he can guard typical NBA situations will be something scouts and coaches have to figure out, and is why individual workouts will be so critical to him and his stock.

    Teams will have to see how well he can hedge on a ballscreen and recover to his man, and see if he is quick enough to trap aballscreen if asked to do so? Can he defend one on one in the low post against a man just as big as him? How does he do guarding someone who faces him up and drives him? How will he do against apick and pop guy? How well and balanced can he be trying to close out on a shooter? How well can he fight someone for position as they come down the floor? How well will he do sprinting to the help position after the ball is reversed on him?

    Many questions to answer I know. My guess is that, with time, that Melowill be a plus defender at the 5 position, but will have some trouble sliding his feet on the perimeter and against perimeter based big guys who face him up.Those aren’t fatal flaws at all, and I suspect his defensive skills at being a superior help defender and rim protector will make him a really nice defensive big man at the next level in a couple of years potentially.


    But like all players that will be available at pick #26, hehas some major concerns I think that have to be discussed.

    One major flaw is his lack of rebounding skill andproduction. A 7 foot center who can’t do much offensively and can’t rebound really isn’t worth much, and to reach his full potential Melo is going to have to rebound much better than he does currently. 3 defensive rebounds a game on average in 25 minutes a game at thecollege level simply won’t get it done.

    Melo has some issues rebounding. First, he overhelped a tonin Syracuse’s zone, always having to shift to the ballside typically when a shot was taken, or perhaps being asked to defend the high post when a shot was taken. This sometimes put him out of normal rebound position, and the ballwould be gobbled up by others. Ok, it happens…..somewhat understandable.

    But…..a great rebounder with a high motor pursues ballsoutside his area much better than Melo does. Basically, it has to come prettyclose to where he is standing for him to be able to snag it. You never see Melo on tape fly from one side of the lane to the other to get boards out of the air, and Melo is rarely the” first guy to sky”. First man in the air wins the rebound is something I say to my own big guys at the high school level, and Melo simply isn’t quick and nimble on his feet from a rebound point of view.

    Now, will he ever improve as a board man? I’d like to say yes, because he is too good of a player to be that bad of a rebounder, and Syracuse zone is odd in how much he had to move around, but it is an open question and no one knows for sure, including me.

    Another concern is conditioning. He played only 25 minutesper game for the Orange, and the reason is he simply wasn’t in good enough shape to be effective playing more than that. I think playing at 270 plus lbs is too many for him, and that a smart NBA team that drafts him will have to give him a nutritionist, chef, and personal trainer to get him in optimalshape, because I am not sure anyone has ever gotten him in great shape to play. Syracuse improved him a lot from his freshman year (when he was awful) to this past year, but much more work needs to be done in getting him in NBA level shape. Is he willing to put the time in to make that happen? Who knows?

    And the last concern is simply the character issue. Fab Melo had a lot of dustups and immaturity issues in college, this is publicknowledge. In fact he likely cost Syracuse a legitimate chance at an NCAA titleby making himself academically ineligible for the NCAA tournament. (the details are hazy, and NCAA rules annoy me anyway…but I think we can safely say that Melo is likely not exactly an honor student)

    Putting your teammates and coaches in a bad position to me shows some character flaws in Fab Melo that Iwould at least want to know more about as an NBA team investing millions ofdollars in him. As far as some of his domestic violence issues, I don’t really know any details about them but we do know that they existed, and teams will want to check those stories out as well.


    So, what do we have in total about the Syracuse big man,when you factor in all the pros and cons?

    I think we have a high upside defensive minded big with alegitimate NBA body and size, who likely will stick in the league as a back up center, and who has enough potential to maybe be a lower minutes/end starter someday if he stays on the straightand narrow. At pick #26, that is pretty good value I think.

    But how does he fit?

    For Indiana’s purposes, we need a legitimate back up centerfor Roy Hibbert, as we really don’t have one currently. However, Melo is too slow and limited to ever play WITH Hibbert, so he is only a backup 5 man, not a guy who can play multiple spots for you.

    To me, in an ideal world you’d have a 3 main bigs: A legitimate center like Hibbert, a legitimate 4 man like West, and another guy who could play at a high level as a substitute for Hibbert, and then slide over and play some 4 man WITH Hibbert. Then you’d have a 4th big backing up Hibbert in limited minutes, and a 5th big who could back up West and preferably give you some skill or attribute than we don’t have elsewhere.

    But the way we are constructed currently, we need pure backups for both West and Hibbert who each play in the high teens or low 20’s in minutes per game. I think if Indiana drafts Melo, it is to be that back up for Hibbert, playing around 16-18 minutes per game as a back up center…….>

    Except that Melo can’t rebound well (at least I believe itis a potential major weakness) and drafting him means pairing him with Hansbrough, a poor rebounding back up 4 man. Of course, long term I don’t know if Hansbrough will be here either, so you can’t let that be a major factor inyour thinking if you are Indiana’s front office I don’t think.

    It is a tough call at #26. But when you factor in his fit on the team, plus his lack of rebounding prowess, plus (and likely most importantly for Indiana) his character questions, I think Indiana likely will pass on Fab Melo. But I myself wouldn’t have any problems taking him, because bigs are hard to find, and I think most of his flaws can becorrected from a basketball point of view. As much more of a defensive minded player, I like how he can compliment Roy Hibbert potentially, and he protects us against injury down the line.

    I also wouldn’t mind taking him, because I highly value character in the locker room, and I trust David West, Danny Granger, George Hill to keep him in line and to teach him how to be a pro.

    In short, I think Melo would bea nice pick for Indiana at #26, but I am doubting that the Pacers see it thesame way. And if you are suddenly in “win now” mode I understand that, because it may be a few years before Melo fully develops into what I think he can be.


    I believe what Indiana will do is a moot point anyway,because I think Melo will be long gone by the time Indiana selects, big guys who can defend are just too valuable to slide that far I think. And if he DOES slide that far, it is probably that his character problems have proven to be so bad that no one wants him…..and if that is the case, we wouldn’t want him either.

    My guess is that Melo will be a strong consideration for Houston as high as #16, Boston at #21 and #22, Atlanta at #23, and Cleveland at #24. The Cavaliers in my view are a strong fit for himat #24 with their current roster and the way they play. But my best guess of all is that he lands at Orlando @19, who needs size badly, especially with Howard I believe likely to be traded this summer.


    Current NBA comparable: Brenden Haywood.
    Former NBA comparable: Eric Dampier

    As always, the above is just my opinion

    Tbird

  • #2
    Fab would be a good fit...

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

      I don't think he'd be Fab-ulous.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

        "To me, in an ideal world you’d have a 3 main bigs: A legitimate center like Hibbert, a legitimate 4 man like West, and another guy who could play at a high level as a substitute for Hibbert, and then slide over and play some 4 man WITH Hibbert.

        Our ongoing wish. Thanks as always, Tbird; eager to read your analysis on Tyler Zeller.

        Then you’d have a 4th big backing up Hibbert in limited minutes, and a 5th big who could back up West and preferably give you some skill or attribute than we don’t have elsewhere."

        Terrence Jones?
        Last edited by DrFife; 05-31-2012, 07:48 PM.


        "He’s no shrinking violet when it comes to that kind of stuff."

        - Rick Carlisle on how Kevin Pritchard responds to needed roster changes.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

          Thanks for the write-up. Not sure if this is our guy... I have a feeling we might be trading / packaging that pick anyway.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

            He'd at least fill a need. I think we could do worse, but I also think we could do better.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

              3 Rebounds a game, You've got to be kidding me.
              You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

                Thank god, MJ is picking him!

                Honestly, I am most definitely not a fan of him, so I hope he is not drafted by us.
                Trying to enjoy every Pacers game as if it is the last!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

                  Nooooooo thank you.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

                    I think Fab has starter potential, but has a lot of work to do, will never be a all star center, but can really be a center on a championship team. With the rebounding, I believe that will improve when he puts a focus on it. It would be kind of cool if he did end up here due to the simple fact he could work with Roy who could teach him a lot I think.

                    Interesting thing about Melo is that he has lost 20 something pounds and there have been reports that he has looked really good in workouts.

                    With all that said I suspect that the Pacers won't be drafting this guy.
                    Why so SERIOUS

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

                      Also I should say that he really has good vision and decent passing skills for a big man, I think he spends so much of his effort going for the block that he puts himself out of position to get rebounds a lot of times, this can be fixed though, especially if he is not playing in the zone defense as much.
                      Why so SERIOUS

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

                        He's not my first choice for our pick, but if he's the best available I think he could be a good backup to Hibbert. He would also be a decent understudy of Hibbert, and I think he could learn a great deal from playing against him regularly in practice.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

                          sounds like a guy that could be a rotation player for the next 10 yrs. can live with that from a #26 pick.

                          i would be happy with the pacers drafting this guy if he is available.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

                            Originally posted by xIndyFan View Post
                            sounds like a guy that could be a rotation player for the next 10 yrs. can live with that from a #26 pick.

                            i would be happy with the pacers drafting this guy if he is available.
                            Interesting thing, when Roy was drafted I though something close to the same thing with him, I think he had a better defensive game at that point but he also had 2 extra years in college, I am glad he turned out to be what he has, that worked out pretty well for the Pacers.
                            Why so SERIOUS

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Tbird 2012 NBA draft analysi#2: Fab Melo

                              I will be happy if we pick Fab Melo. I think he has a good upside and would immediately fill the second biggest need on our team. All year we watched as Hibbert would go to the bench, teams could finally attack the paint and it would keep them in the game or give them a lead. Melo's rebounding can be worked on, and I know Vogel values it so it would be a point of emphasis. But we really need another 7-foot shot blocker to play behind Hibbert.

                              As for his offense, he can learn that over time. Working with Hibbert would be great for him. Roy has worked hard and improved every part of his game every year, and I think Roy would be a great mentor for Fab.

                              And the character issues are not too concerning for me either. I think we have enough good character guys on this team right now to keep it under control. Look at how Lance Stephenson went from "typical thug" to awesome teammate in a season.

                              If Fab is there, I think you have to take him. He was a huge part of a great team in Syracuse, and he fits a need perfectly.
                              It's a new day for Pacers Basketball.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X