Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts


REMINDER: Per PD policy, please do not share a link to, describe how to search for, request a link to, or request a PM about streaming video of a NBA game that is not coming directly through the NBA. Not even in a "wink-wink, nudge-nudge, know-what-I-mean" round-about sort of way. Thank you



Season Records: (W-L)
42-24
Home
All: 23-10
East: 16-7
37-29
Away
All: 16-17
East: 13-11
Upcoming Games:
Apr 30
May 2
May 5
May 8
May 11
vs
NBATV
at
NBATV
vs
vs
If Necessary
at
If Necessary
7:30 pm
7:30 pm
2:00 pm
TBD
TBD


Projected Starting Lineup:
C
PF
SF
SG
PG
HIBBERT
WEST
GRANGER
GEORGE
HILL
Projected Starting Lineup:
C
PF
SF
SG
PG
DAVIS
ANDERSON
RICHARDSON
REDICK
NELSON


Pacers
Leandro Barbosa, sprained ankle, questionable
Darren Collison, sore groin, probable

Magic
Glen Davis, sprained ankle, probable
Dwight Howard, herniated disc, out



Video Playoff Series Previews:


Eight Points, Nine Seconds Preview:
Jared Wade: Pacers vs. Magic - 2012 Playoff Series Preview

It starts tonight. The heavily favored Pacers square off against the Magic
tonight at 7:00 pm in Bankers Life Fieldhouse. Without Dwight Howard, most
experts agree: Orlando is a dead team walking. It seems impossible that Stan
Van Gundy, almost certainly a lame-duck coach with only a week or two left on
the job, will be able to rally his troops enough for them to mount a true threat
to Indiana. The interior advantage the Pacers have will likely be just too much
to handle. And while the Magic can still be deadly from behind the arc, three-
point shooting has rarely propelled a lesser team to victory in a seven-game
series.

The outcome, then, may be anticlimactic, but this is just how Pacers fans
should want it. The team hasn’t won a playoff series since 2005 so getting a
wounded opponent is just what the Dr. (Hibbert) ordered.

There is still plenty to watch for, however.


Four of the Pacers five highest-scoring players this season have never played
in the second round of the playoffs. With the addition of David West (24 career
playoff games), George Hill (20), Leandro Barbosa (64) and Lou Amundson
(18), the roster does now have considerably more postseason experience than
last year’s near-playoff-virgin squad did when they faced the Bulls. But nobody
on this roster has played together in the second round, and none of the guys
who played in that Chicago series have ever played in playoff series in which
they were favored. So it will be interesting to see how they respond. To falter
to such a degree that they lose to the Magic would be a collapse too large to
even discuss before game one. But it will be important to see how they
respond if — and when — some adversity surfaces. Because Orlando will
make enough runs in most of these games to steal momentum. They
have plenty of offensive firepower to trade blows with Indiana, which is
prone to some long scoring droughts.

Will the Pacers respond by going back to their strengths of pounding the ball
inside and moving it around the perimeter? Will any of the sometimes-hesitant-
to-shoot players (looking at you, Paul George) shy away? Will the Darren-
Collison-as-backup-point-guard experiment face more hurdles than expected?
Will Roy Hibbert play like the All-Star he was this season or post a line like 7
and 5? Will Tyler Hansbrough make jumpers?

Other than concerns related to inexperience and psychology, the key for
Indiana will be stopping...CONTINUE READING AT 8p9s

ENJOY ALL OF 8p9s POST-SEASON COVERAGE HERE


MAGIC BASKETBALL
5-on-5 roundtable: Previewing Magic-Pacers

“We all we got.”

Glen Davis came up with the slogan in response to the Orlando Magic’s
whirlwind regular season that has been decimated by injuries, punctuated
with Dwight Howard needing season-ending back surgery to repair a
herniated disk.

Dwight done for the year, Hedo Turkoglu still recovering from facial
fracture surgery (he donned a mask for Thursday’s game against the
Memphis Grizzlies), and Davis — himself — trying to heal a sprained right
ankle as fast as possible, it’s no surprise the Magic have taken on a bunker-
like mentality. And for Orlando, in a season which has featured a lot of
drama and controversy, it’s only fitting that they will be playing with their
backs against the wall in their first round playoff series with the Indiana
Pacers.

The Magic have been playing with their backs against the all practically all
year, what with Dwight’s saga dominating the headlines. But will any of that
matter? Does Orlando, with the odds heavily stacked against them, stand
a chance against the Indiana Pacers?

The crew at Magic Basketball, with the help from our friends over at Eight
Points, Nine Seconds, attempt to find that out.


What is the greatest matchup advantage for the Magic?


Nate Drexler, Magic Basketball: There are few teams capable of truly
guarding Ryan Anderson when he’s stretched out. Certainly Indiana has
the advantage inside, but if Anderson can stretch things out and catch
fire it might create some problems for the Pacers. Then again, with
Dwight out and Anderson on the three-point line I have to wonder who is
going to rebound the ball.

Danny Nowell, Magic Basketball: Ryan Anderson. “The Grenade Launcher”
should be able to draw some of Indiana’s considerable brawn out of the
paint and free some things up for a hopefully dialed-in Jameer Nelson.
It’s really the Magic’s only hope, as I see things.

Matt Scribbins, Magic Basketball: With the current roster, Ryan Anderson
is the greatest matchup advantage no matter who the Magic play. Other
teams, including the Pacers, do not have players who can defend a stretch
four that knocks down shots consistently from beyond the arc.

Tim Donahue, Eight Points, Nine Seconds: Ryan Anderson vs. the Pacer
starting bigs. Neither David West nor Roy Hibbert are fleet of foot, and a
stretch big like Anderson can pull either of them far out of their comfort
zone defensively. A big series by Anderson will not only weaken the Pacer
D by spreading them out, but could force the Pacers to go small.

Jared Wade, Eight Points, Nine Seconds: Ummm … hmmm … let me see
if … got nothing. Would perhaps say the coach if I didn’t presume a few of
the players hate Stan now and Frank Vogel hadn’t been so good this season.
But, otherwise, just not seeing a single advantage for the Magic without
Dwight.


What is the greatest matchup advantage for the Pacers?


Drexler: Roy Hibbert will not be contained by any of the “bigs” left in
Orlando. We cannot forget that Hibbert is an All-Star center and an
extreme talent, especially when he’s not restricted by the best center in
the league. Look for Indiana to pound the ball in and let Hibbert go to
work.

Nowell: Defensive length. I was going to write “post depth,” since the
Magic have precisely none right now and will likely get feasted on by
Hibbert and West. But this applies across the board; at almost every
position, the Pacers have an athlete who can disrupt Orlando’s already
limited ability to create shots.

Scribbins: Once again, with the current roster, almost every team is
going to have an advantage inside against Orlando. It’s a tough task to
lose the most dominant center in the game and still compete inside.
David West and Roy Hibbert will dominate.

Donahue: The Pacer starting bigs vs. Orlando’s bigs. With no Dwight, both
Hibbert and West should have an advantage in the post over whoever is
guarding them. If the Pacers are able to get these two consistent touches
on the block, I can’t see the Magic being able to make stops.

Wade: Roy Hibbert. I thought it was a little silly when the Magic gave so
much money to Marcin Gortat to back up Howard. They could really use
him back right now though, eh? There isn’t a player on Orlando’s roster who
can even consider stopping Hibbert. Fortunately for Magic fans, sometimes
the Pacers do that themselves by simply ignoring him. But I think at least
one 27-12 game can be expected from the big fella.


Who is the x-factor in this series for the Pacers?


Drexler: Paul George. In...CONTINUE READING AT MAGIC BASKETBALL


Hickory-High
Jordan Kahn: Indiana and Orlando - By The Tape

Jordan Kahn breaks down the latest NBA trends in video form. You can find more of
his work at Basketball Things and follow him on Twitter @AyoitsJordan.

With Dwight Howard missing the playoffs, most pundits are picking the Pacers
to beat the Magic with relative ease. With the help of mySynergy Sports, let’s
take a look at how the Pacers can take advantage of the new-look Magic and
how Orlando can change things up without Dwight.

Indiana

It may be surprising, but the Magic ranked last in the NBA in defending the
post, and that was with Dwight Howard in the lineup for the majority of the
year. Now that Howard is out, Roy Hibbert will be facing one of Glen Davis,
Ryan Anderson, Earl Clark, or Daniel Orton in the post. In case there was
any doubt about that being a mismatch, the chart below shows how
bad those four have been as post defenders.


Orton allows the fewest points per possession, but he has been on the floor
so little that he doesn’t qualify to be ranked. The rest of the frontcourt
ranges from meh to very bad as post defenders.

Once Hibbert starts scoring the post, things will open things up for the rest
of the Pacers. Hibbert is a pretty good passer, so one thing the Pacers wings
do cut off Hibbert after they throw the post entry. The clips below show a
few examples. Even if the wing defender doesn’t lose his man, he can just
be pushed into Hibbert, who serves as a screener.


When the Pacers aren’t cutting to the basket, they can spot up for threes.
Instead of just standing and waiting for the ball to come, Indiana has set
screens for Danny Granger to get him open. The video below shows
Granger’s man giving him a bit too much space and then getting caught by
surprise on a David West screen. The post player in the video clips is Paul
George, but this action could easily be run with Hibbert in the post,
as well.


Speaking of Granger using screens...CONTINUE READING AT HICKORY-HIGH


140 Characters of (Non-PD) Coverage
Pacers
Mike Wells @MikeWellsNBA
Jared Wade @8pts9secs
Tim Donahue @TimDonahue8p9s
Tom Lewis @indycornrows
Ian Levy @HickoryHigh
Magic
Orlando Sentinel @joshuabrobbins
Magic Basketball @erivera7
Orlando Pinstripe Post @BQRMagic

Last edited by avoidingtheclowns; 04-28-2012, 03:17 PM.
This is the darkest timeline.

  • #2
    Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. MagicPlayoff

    Why is Jones in the starting line up? Where is Granger?
    Originally posted by IrishPacer
    Empty vessels make the most noise.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

      It looks like Hedo will play with a protective mask. Big Baby looks to play as well ( as noted before ).
      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. MagicPlayoff

        Originally posted by Nuntius View Post
        Why is Jones in the starting line up? Where is Granger?
        I have absolutively, posilutely no idea what you're referring to.

        (That's a lie. Thanks for the reminder...just an oversight in updating the table from the last game preview. Too busy focused on the new elements I s'pose.)
        This is the darkest timeline.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

          haven't felt this excited in a long long time. of course i would be happy with a win but i hope we crush magic tonight.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

            No problem, ATC
            Originally posted by IrishPacer
            Empty vessels make the most noise.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

              Just cracked open my first beer! Probably should have held of a little longer... 4 hours and counting!


              Pacers gonna lay waste to Orlando!
              "I have never taken the high road, but I tell other people to ’cause then there’s more room for me on the low road."

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

                PG needs to bring it today hopefully he doesn't pick up two early fouls and have to sit the majority of the first half.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

                  I have decided that the value of the Amazon.com Gift Card will be the final +/- for the series.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

                    SO STOKED!! LEAVING NOW FOR THE GAME!!! CANT WAIT!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

                      They just showed Jameer Nelson warming up. Seats have shirts on them, looking like a gold-out tonight
                      PSN: bhm184

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

                        http://instagr.am/p/J-j14jGYY0/
                        http://instagr.am/p/J-lxFtGYZv/
                        Last edited by PGisthefuture; 04-28-2012, 05:16 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

                          Originally posted by PGisthefuture View Post
                          I kind of hate our gold alternates, but I have to admit that looks cool, better than our navy blue would have looked.

                          That throwback royal blue would have been sweet though. I'm going to miss those jerseys.
                          "Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better." - Albert Camus

                          "Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well." - Voltaire

                          "Everyone's values are defined by what they will tolerate when it is done to others." - William Greider

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

                            Looks like a bee hive.
                            PSN: bhm184

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 4/28/2012 NBA Playoffs, First Round - Game Thread #1: Pacers Vs. Magic

                              Any word on who on ESPN will be calling it? I'm guessing the D team, but who does that consist of?


                              Carmel HS Class of 2011

                              Comment

                              • Working...
                                X