Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird 2011 NBA draft analysis #6: Jordan Hamilton

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tbird 2011 NBA draft analysis #6: Jordan Hamilton

    Tbird 2011 NBA draft analysis #6: Jordan Hamilton
    Written by thunderbird1245

    Link

    Back to the lonestar state today with the 6th installment of this series, a profile of the Texas Longhorn Jordan Hamilton. Previously I have done in depth scouting reports on Alec Burks, Klay Thompson, Tristan Thompson, Marcus Morris, and Chris Singleton. If interested you can find those profiles elsewhere on this site.

    Measuring in at 6’8″ 1/2 and 228lbs, Hamilton has prototypical size for an NBA wing. He is built well with strong legs and a well developed physique in general, and definitely looks the part of an NBA player. Not a freak athlete, but easily well within the range of athleticism needed to play from a physical standpoint in the league.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————–

    Let’s look at Hamilton’s offensive game first, which by far is his most impressive end of the floor.

    Hamilton isn’t what I would call a pure gunner, but he definitely has a scorer’s mentality….that is the first thing you notice when watching film. When not involved in a play directly, he isn’t too motivated to move well and doesn’t seem to be that engaged. But when a scoring opportunity is within his grasp, Hamilton is aggressive in pursuing it……he definitely has, for lack of a better phrase, an “alpha dog” mentality on the offensive end. Hamilton is a scorer and shot hunter, and he will sometimes take shots that really scratch your head. Shot selection at the NBA level is something that he will have to improve big time, as veterans playing with him won’t appreciate him jacking ill timed shots, nor will he have anywhere near as long a leash in the pro game as had under Texas Coach Rick Barnes.

    The thing is, Hamilton can take and make tough shots, which sometimes can give him more confidence than he probably should have. But making tough shots is a skill that can’t be discounted either…..being able to make plays when closely guarded is a valuable skill and one that is more rare than you’d like in this draft.

    Hamilton is a really good shooter with deep NBA range. He can get his shot off quickly with repeatable mechanics and a very quick release. I really like his footwork, but more than that I like his shot from waist level and above, as he shoots the ball quickly from his pocket to the release point faster and more consistently than any player I have seen in this draft so far off of a catch and shoot situation. He is a really aggressive and sound cutter, doing an already nice job of rounding cuts and getting his shoulders square as he is catching the ball, not waiting until the catch is made like so many young players do. Being almost 6’9, Hamilton will have no trouble geting his shot off I don’t think in the NBA.

    One word of caution on that front however is that he doesn’t get very high lift off the ground. Now, that actually doesn’t bother me in the least….but it will some people. In fact I think in general it helps your accuracy as a jump shooter to not jump that high off the ground, as it makes your mechanics more consistent and repeatable. Think about that some and I believe most will agree. Hamilton in fact did hit*385 from the college three point line and beyond last year, despite being the focal point of opponents defense.

    Hamilton has a post game also, unlike some of our current wings. He seals his man on his hip well, and establishes good position. If you feed him the ball in the low post, he can go to either shoulder to score. Though not refined that well, he has a nice baby hook, can drop step with either foot, and can make the turnaround jumper inside over smaller people. Becaus he doesn’t get great lift I don’t think he can do that on bigger players, but if guarded by smaller wings he should be able to be a post up wing threat for you I believe.

    Because it is an opportunity to score, Hamilton cuts very hard when he is away from the ball. He will be a good guy to run plays for, as if he knows he is getting a shot opportunity he is going to go max effort for you. He sets up his man well, though he takes off early on screens sometimes a little too often and has to be reminded of that from time to time. Unfortunately he also shows frustration when he cuts hard and DOESNT recieve a pass, and can pout some if he doesn’t get touches…..a sign of either youth and immaturity, or selfishness, depending on whether you like Hamilton or not.

    Hamilton is maybe the best rebounding wing in this draft. He is strong as a bull, and seems to really like to rebound, especially on the offensive glass. He is strong enough to move people in his way, and uses brute strength to shove smaller people blocking him out underneath the rim. He averaged nearly 8 boards per game last year, a very good sign. He blocks out well on the defensive glass, though not a great leaper or explosive athlete he was productive in that aspect too.* I can easily see him being a win who produces on average 6 boards a game at the NBA level or so eventually, depending of course on minutes played.

    His major weakness offensively is, along with atrocious at times shot selection, is the inability to put the ball on the deck and drive. He really can’t explode past his guy, even if his defender is off balance a little. He shoots his jump shot with a slightly narrower base than ideal, and doesn’t get his legs bent on the catch well enough (which is why he doesn’t lift well in a catch and shoot). That doesn’t hurt him when he just rises and shoots, but when he has to attack dribble his posture and balance is all jacked up. His first dribble especially is too high and doesn’t go anywhere, and lets the defender stay in the play. Hamilton is not a guy who can drive you or a guy who will have isolations ran for him at the next level unless he drastically improves fundamentally his stance and balance on a catch. He has zero left hand at this point, and therefore is fairly easy to scout and game plan for, though in reality there are alot of players who are very “one handed” on their drive (Danny Granger being one of them). The problem is with Hamilton even his ability to go right is questionable.

    In the mid range game he is going of course going to struggle, because he cant get separation and he can’t get off the ground well enough….this ends making him take tougher harder to make shots than they would need to be if he had is act together off the dribble. Much of this I think could be fixed if he’d make his last dribble a “super hard” one before he loads and fires off the bounce…..a hidden small technique that really helps off the dribble jump shooters get the ball into the pocket with their legs bent in rhythm, improving technique and accuracy. Right now his last drible seems to just be a normal dribble, which means he has to bend a little and move the ball more to get it in position to load and shoot, throwing off the timing and rhythm of his off the bounce pull up game.

    He also shys away from contact, rarely getting to the foul line, too bad because he is a pretty good foul shooter…he just rarely gets there.

    So offensively, Hamilton seems to be a big powerful wing who likes to shoot the basketball, and is proficient off a catch and shoot, and has pretty good skills in the elbow and low/mid post area. He takes bad shots, pouts when he doesn’t get the ball sometimes, and cannot drive to the rim. His pull up game has potential but right now isn’t very good either….though like I said, I think he can improve that quite a bit with proper coaching.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————— ———————–

    So he has some NBA ready offensive skills, has a great body, and is a bull on the backboard…..why isn’t he more highly thought of?

    Defensively is the answer.

    I don’t think Hamilton is incapable of guarding people. In fact, he has enough athleticism to be decent if not better than that. But defense is more than just having quickness and athleticism, it is about things like “awareness”,* “mental toughness”", “concentration”, “attention to detail”, and “desire”. Hamilton in college displayed none of these traits on a consistent basis.

    On the ball he was ok, he has the ability to muscle drivers enough to keep them in front of him. But away from the ball he was bad….never jumping to the ball, playing with his hands down at his sides, not communicating with his teammates, not being in help position, and not knowing where the basketball was. Very much a “man hugger”, he was easy to screen for opponents, and teams could go after him on that end because he either was worried about fouls, mad because he wasn’t scoring well, or just didn’t seem to care that much if his man scored or not.

    He was poor at contesting shots, poor at denying his man the basketball, and poor at doing the things you have to do to be a winning defensive player. His hands and arms were inactive, something that should be a cardinal sin for a player of his skill level. People shot over him with ease, and that shouldn’t have been the case. But as aggravating as that was, it was his body language on the floor that was worse….basically he wasn’t a guy his teammates and coaches could rely on to help them if they needed it, and worse than that it didn’t seem to ever improve as the season went along.

    Basically, from a defensive point of view, I just didn’t think Hamilton seemed to “get it”. A little bit of the alpha dog mentality on offense is good, but he had it defensively too…..seemingly he cared alot more about HIS man scoring than he did if his TEAM gave up points. This type of mentality is why he seemed to be getting an earful from his point guard alot….a player I will have some stuff to say about before draft night is complete.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——————–

    In summary, I think in Hamilton we have a powerfully built, athletic, strong wing man who can really shoot the basketball. He cuts well and plays without the basketball as an inside cutter very nicely. He can score in a variety of ways, but he won’t get to the line for you or take anyone off the dribble…basically a spot up guy or a guy you can run off screens, and you can post him up some. He will run the floor hard offensively and rebound well due to his size and aggression.

    But we also have an immature, somewhat selfish player who doesn’t guard anyone and who takes really bad shots sometimes, especially if he hasn’t hoisted one up in a few possessions. Obviously Hamilton is young and has talent, but how well he takes instruction and how much he understands and improves upon his weaknesses will determine his future NBA success…..I think Hamilton could go either way, and either eventually be a nice wing rotation player (maybe even a starter, he has good enough skills/talent/potential to start for alot of teams), or be a guy who lets the cash go to his head and doesn’t work hard, and ends up bouncing around the league from team to team.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————

    Like many players at this point, I am having a somewhat difficult time figuring out where to put Hamilton.* It isn’t like Hamilton isn’t talented, because he is….I just didn’t like watching him play personally, and he isn’t my kind of guy. But with his skill level and NBA body, he will still be drafted fairly high I would think.

    To me, he’d be a great fit for the Charlotte Bobcats at #9 (or maybe #19), and that is who I think will take him. Paul Silas would be a good mentor for him, as would Michael Jordan. They need a perimeter shooting wing badly in Charlotte, and despite his considerable faults I still like him better than the other choice for a perimeter shooting wing, Klay Thompson. Other teams I could see choosing him would be the Warriors at #11, Houston at #14 or #23, and *Philadelphia at #16, as he’d be a nice fit next to Evan Turner if indeed he reaches his full potential.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————

    Would/should the Pacers select him at #15?

    I wouldn’t obviously, but I can see arguments both ways. We definitely do need an athletic wing off our bench, and Hamilton can really shoot the basketball from the perimeter, which is a trait Larry Bird really values. Hamilton’s aggressive scoring mentality might really boost our somewhat points challenged second unit. His rebounding strength from the wing position long term is valuable on a team with poorer rebounders than average at the “4″ and “5″, which we have.

    Still, ultimately I see us passing, if indeed Hamilton is there. I think the lack of defense, immaturity, and overall poor fit compared to what we already have in place will lead Larry Bird to go in another direction than the Texas sharpshooter on draft night.

    —————————————————————————————————————————————————— ———————-

    NBA modern comparable: poor man’s Stephen Jackson

    NBA past comparable: destitute, living under a bridge version of Eddie Johnson….a comparable I hate to make because I really liked Eddie Johnson, and don’t particularly like Hamilton. Can anyone do any better?

    As always, the above is just my opinion.

    Tbird

    *beeps*

  • #2
    Re: Tbird 2011 NBA draft analysis #6: Jordan Hamilton

    Hamilton doesn't appeal to me, especially for our team.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Tbird 2011 NBA draft analysis #6: Jordan Hamilton

      Originally posted by IndyPacer View Post
      Hamilton doesn't appeal to me, especially for our team.
      Because we already have Danny and Paul?
      I dont think you can ever have enough good, athletic scorers. I really like Hamilton but I honestly dont see him falling to us. If he does, there are some really dumb GM's. He actually plays well off the ball AND can score in several ways.

      Comment

      Working...
      X