Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

    Just wondering if anyone has heard anything. I hope he stays healthy and wants to play another year.

  • #2
    Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

    I haven't heard anything but i did wanna comment anyways.

    He has been in great shape i think this year. Very strong. His intentinal fouls drive people crazy because hes so strong. I hope he stays for another year or two. We could definitely use his fiesty-ness and leadership on and off the court.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

      I like how he is always competetive, as well as a veteran presence.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

        I read he wanted to play for anther year or two. I coundn't find that link, but I remembered this from Brunner and Pacers.com.

        Player Analysis: Jeff Foster

        6-11, 250 pounds, 34 years old (1/6/77) Photos | Profile | Video


        LOOKING BACK: Though not actually the oldest player on the roster (James Posey beat him by three days for that particular honor), Jeff Foster served in the elder statesman's role for the Pacers in 2010-11. The lone link to the Reggie Miller glory years, Foster was a rookie when the team reached the NBA Finals in 2000, although he wasn't on the playoff roster. One of three players to serve at least 12 seasons in Indiana, Foster ranks fourth in franchise history in games played (753), third in offensive rebounds (2,083) and fifth in total rebounds (5,206). He missed 17 of the first 19 games with injury issues but just nine thereafter, averaging 6.3 rebounds in just 16.8 minutes per game. The lone veteran to survive the youth movement under interim coach Frank Vogel, Foster kept the much younger Solomon Jones on the bench for most of the season's second half, including the playoffs.

        LOOKING AHEAD: Coming off a 2009-10 season in which he played just 16 games before back surgery, Foster established himself as a player that can be highly productive in relatively short minutes. As the Pacers look to bolster their frontcourt rotation with younger, more athletic bodies, his role could further diminish -- or even be eliminated. He said after the postseason concluded he hoped to remain with the Pacers for many years to come and there's little doubt the franchise would like to retain this valued veteran under the right conditions.

        KEY STATS: Foster ranked fifth in the NBA win average of 17.8 rebounds per 48 minutes played, the highest of his career for a full season.

        CONTRACT STATUS: Free agent.

        OUTLOOK: Though Foster's value to the Pacers is, and has been, apparent, whether he fits in the big-picture plan moving forward remains to be seen. One of three free agents in the frontcourt rotation (along with Josh McRoberts and Solomon Jones), Foster could be highly attractive to a team that believes itself to be one veteran big man away from championship contention. It is difficult to imagine an Indiana team without Foster but given the uncertainty on so many fronts this summer, it must be considered a real possibility.
        -------------------

        When he said many years to come I don't think he meant playing. From what I've read I believe he wants to play a couple more years and then work in the front office.
        Last edited by Will Galen; 05-12-2011, 12:18 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

          Jeff is old school, he gets you extra possessions and at key times. I made the comment yesterday that no one is willing to give a good hard foul this year, except for the punk stuff LA did, other than Jeff.

          I look at it this way. Last year, Jeff was still your best offensive rebounder overall (one of the best per min in the league) and best big defender situationally, still.

          You can't overpay him or over play him, but he has tons of value, to me.

          I could see him going to Boston or at least he would have been a huge improvement over Jermaine O'Neal and they'd use him the same way.

          Almost every team left in the playoffs could use a Jeff Foster, he'd play on a contender, I have no doubt. He does the dirty work, the stuff that isn't 'fun'. Those guys are hard to come by.

          I'll root for Jeff where ever he ends up, honestly.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

            Originally posted by Speed View Post
            Jeff is old school, he gets you extra possessions and at key times. I made the comment yesterday that no one is willing to give a good hard foul this year, except for the punk stuff LA did, other than Jeff.

            I look at it this way. Last year, Jeff was still your best offensive rebounder overall (one of the best per min in the league) and best big defender situationally, still.

            You can't overpay him or over play him, but he has tons of value, to me.

            I could see him going to Boston or at least he would have been a huge improvement over Jermaine O'Neal and they'd use him the same way.

            Almost every team left in the playoffs could use a Jeff Foster, he'd play on a contender, I have no doubt. He does the dirty work, the stuff that isn't 'fun'. Those guys are hard to come by.

            I'll root for Jeff where ever he ends up, honestly.
            Ya totally agree. Unfortunately he cant play long minutes anymore, but if you play him at the right time he can be a huge asset with the things he does.

            He is one of the only ones who would commit hard, but not over the top fouls on guys, just to make sure they were NOT getting the ball in the hoop. He would hold them up from hitting the ground and people would still get angry at him. He's not a jerk, just a smart, hard playing veteran. I would also root for him if he left for another team.. Hes a great guy and player.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

              [QUOTE=Speed;1233953]


              You can't overpay him /QUOTE]


              He already was! That has always been my problem with Foster the last 2 years. One of Bird's major blunders as PBO is having overpaid Foster. Bird should had paid him 6-8 mil for those 2 years. If Bird pays much more than the vet min, he's blundered again.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

                If a broken down JO is worth the mid level, 5.8 I think, whats Jeff worth. Thats a bad example, but still. If I was a contender, I'd pay him a 2 year 9 million deal and not think twice. Or what you pay a 4th big.

                I think in a tight playoff game you can depend on him to get you 2 extra 4th quarter possessions, that is valuable.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

                  I truly hope we get to retain Jeff for the last year or two of his career.

                  His heart and hard play has earned him the honor of retiring a 'one-teamer', ALA: Reggie.

                  Not to mention that he is a huge fan favorite, and rightfully so.

                  He makes huge key plays that give us chances down the stretch. I remember during one of the Chicago games when he tipped out I want to say 3 consecutive offensive rebounds during a key offensive play.

                  I love Jeff and want him here.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

                    A year or two ago I was down on Jeff and high on Roy. That's starting to reverse a bit.
                    "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

                      Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                      He already was! That has always been my problem with Foster the last 2 years. One of Bird's major blunders as PBO is having overpaid Foster. Bird should had paid him 6-8 mil for those 2 years. If Bird pays much more than the vet min, he's blundered again.
                      Yep. I love Foster, but if it weren't for his extension, we would have been able to keep Jarrett Jack.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

                        I was at Game 4 vs Chicago and me and my nephew's seats were right beside the elliptical machine that Jeff was on most of the time he wasn't on the floor. I'm talking literally a foot or two away from him. When he jumped on it one time I yelled at him "I really hope you come back next year, Jeff. We need ya bud." He started nodding his head before I was finished talking as if to signal that he was and then he said "Thanks." Don't know how much you can buy into that small exchange but my feeling was he has intentions of coming back.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

                          [QUOTE=Justin Tyme;1234017]
                          Originally posted by Speed View Post


                          You can't overpay him /QUOTE]


                          He already was! That has always been my problem with Foster the last 2 years. One of Bird's major blunders as PBO is having overpaid Foster. Bird should had paid him 6-8 mil for those 2 years. If Bird pays much more than the vet min, he's blundered again.
                          I think you might have read Speed wrong. I think he was trying to say you shouldn't overpay him.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Any word on what Jeff Foster's plans are?

                            Originally posted by Phree Refill View Post
                            I was at Game 4 vs Chicago and me and my nephew's seats were right beside the elliptical machine that Jeff was on most of the time he wasn't on the floor. I'm talking literally a foot or two away from him. When he jumped on it one time I yelled at him "I really hope you come back next year, Jeff. We need ya bud." He started nodding his head before I was finished talking as if to signal that he was and then he said "Thanks." Don't know how much you can buy into that small exchange but my feeling was he has intentions of coming back.
                            He wants to come back, and despite the trip to Boston late in the year, his back feels good. As evidence, see the above post about where he ranked in the NBA per 48 minutes in his specialty area. The guy deserves more than the vet minimum for what he does, IMO. As for not being able to play big minutes, I think back to when he was most effective. Several times this year he was a fireball when just coming into the game. Two or three times, I recall him putting up about 6 rebounds in 6 minutes. Go through each game, and you will see that on a per minute basis, he did better than Hibbert defensively, and often matched or exceeded Hibbert's output offensively. Because Hibbert was often in foul trouble, Jeff had to play long stretches, or a medium stretch followed by another quick Hibbert foul leading to Foster's number being called again. Foster at 16-20 minutes a game is a positive for the Pacers. I just wish he'd get more cheers when he enters the game. Being a fan favorite he should get more applause when he comes in.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X