Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

    For those younger than 30, you are probably asking who is Chris Washburn? He was in the tragic draft of 1986, and he could have been really good.

    When you look at players like Washburn, William Bedford, Roy Tarpley - 3 big guys who could have been really good. Tarpley was good for a few years, but Washburn could have been the best of the three.

    I guess that was the drug draft, looking down the list - Harold Pressley, Maurice Martin, Walter berry, John Williams, of course len Bias - all very sad.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...burnlife071510

    Washburn traveled long road to recovery

    By Marc J. Spears, Yahoo! Sports
    3 hours, 44 minutes ago



    Printable View
    Return to Original Email Print
    .He was a 6-foot-11 giant delivered from the basketball gods by way of Jim Valvano. Chris Washburn had it all. A feathery touch. A guard’s handle. The strength of a center. So much talent, so much promise.

    Twenty-four NBA drafts have passed since the Golden State Warriors made Washburn the No. 3 pick in 1986, 24 opportunities for Washburn to remember what he once had and quickly lost. The most celebrated free-agent class in the league’s history also has served as a harsh reminder for Washburn this summer. Had Washburn lived up to his potential, he could have banked his own millions and retired as one of the game’s greats. Instead, he left only as a cautionary tale.

    More From Marc J. Spears.Wall starts shaky, finishes strong Jul 12, 2010U.S. will have new team for Worlds Jul 11, 2010.“I know I’m supposed to be a Hall of Famer,” Washburn said recently in a rare interview. “But I’ve come to realize that I’m in the Hall of Shame. …I see that I’m considered one of the worst draft choices. …I’m seeing that I’m part of being called a bust.”

    Washburn can’t argue with the labels. In the nearly quarter-century since he left the NBA, Washburn has slept on the floors of crack houses and eaten from trash bins. He’s served time in the penitentiary and squandered the money he did make – all in search of his next high. His greatest victory never came on the court, but after a dozen stays in rehab centers. Somehow, Chris Washburn is alive and, he promises, clean.

    Now 44, Washburn says he’s been drug-free for 10 years. He lives in Dallas and works for a home-mortgage company. His two sons, Julian and Chris Jr., have become college prospects in their own right, and if Washburn can give them anything, it’s the lessons he learned from his own mistakes.




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Washburn grew up in Hickory, N.C., as a self-proclaimed country boy. He was friendly, quick with a smile and even quicker to trust. A free spirit, teammates called him. He also was immensely talented on the basketball court, becoming a three-time All-American in high school.


    “I look back at him and I think about the great big guys that were coming out,” said Portland Trail Blazers coach Nate McMillan, who played with Washburn at North Carolina State and whose wife attended high school with Washburn.


    “Some of the things that Shaquille [O’Neal] was doing, Washburn was doing as a forward-center who could run and jump and shoot. He could do it all. He had the talent to certainly be an All-Star.”


    Washburn quickly learned that such talent also came with a benefit: Whatever he wanted, he got. Rarely did someone tell him no. An only child, he was accustomed to being coddled and that didn’t stop once he arrived at college.


    “Anything that I did that was wrong, someone would take care of it,” he said. “Not having brothers and sisters, everything I did, I had to learn on a first-hand basis. When I did something dumb, instead of me taking the fall for that, they would keep cleaning it up, allowing me to have more rope.”


    The basketball program at N.C. State, Washburn said, was among his biggest enablers. He had poor grades in high school, but that didn’t worry him. Nor did having to take the SAT.

    “The coaches over there told me, ‘You already signed, you’re already in school, you just have to take the test just to get into college,’ ” Washburn said. “When they told me it didn’t matter what score I was getting, I went in for about 22 minutes. I just marked down [answers] … mark, mark, mark.

    “If the coach told me I needed 700, 800 on the test to get to school, I could’ve got that. But when they said I didn’t need it, I didn’t need it.”

    Washburn scored a 470 out a possible 1,600, barely above the minimum. Subsequent news reports about his poor score helped spur the NCAA to raise the minimum standards for athletes to gain admittance to college.

    Still, that didn’t stop N.C. State from welcoming Washburn as part of a tremendous recruiting class that also included McMillan and another future NBA guard, Vinny Del Negro.


    Chris Washburn (second from right) was taken third in the 1986 draft, which also included William Bedford (left), Len Bias (second from left) and Brad Daugherty (right).
    (NBAE/ Getty Images) Washburn averaged 17.6 points and 6.7 rebounds as a sophomore and had a memorable 26-point performance in a victory over rival top-ranked North Carolina. The Wolfpack advanced to the Elite Eight of the 1986 NCAA tournament before losing to Kansas.

    “The sky was the limit with his talent, size,” said Del Negro, who now coaches the Los Angeles Clippers.

    Washburn’s self-destructive behavior also had few boundaries. He began drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana in high school, and shortly after the Wolfpack’s loss to Kansas, he said a player from another school introduced him to cocaine.

    “Instead of being like, ‘Nah, I don’t do that,’ I wanted to be a part of the crowd,” Washburn said. “If they were doing it, why don’t I try it? And after I tried it, I never went back to school again.”

    Washburn declared for the draft, and NBA scouts marveled at the depth of his skills. He could play inside and out, bang in the post and shoot from deep. The Warriors selected him with the third pick behind Brad Daugherty and Len Bias. Less than two days after the draft, Bias died from a cocaine overdose. Washburn learned of the news while he was at a New York Police Athletic League function. He said he was high.

    “I was down there doing something on athletes against crime,” Washburn said. “I had a whole box of tissues just wiping my nose, because at that point in time I was just snorting. Some dude asked me, ‘What you think about Len?’ I was like, ‘What you talking about?’ He then showed me a newspaper with an article.

    “That shook me up for a minute. I couldn’t grasp it. I didn’t go to the funeral. It didn’t make no sense to me.”




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Washburn said he stopped using cocaine after Bias’ death, but not for long. When the Warriors drafted him, he didn’t know the location of “Golden State.” He learned soon enough. Oakland, Calif., was nicknamed “City of Dope.” It didn’t take long for the Warriors to figure out their prized rookie had a problem.

    “It was a year of highs and lows,” said George Karl, who was then the Warriors coach. “I remember the first day of training camp he was by far the best player on the court, and then you could slowly see him disintegrate.

    “How to fix a drug problem has never been easy for a head coach. It’s a frustrating give-and-take. We obviously didn’t get it done there. Chris is one of the guys that I think threw away a lot of good basketball because of drugs.”

    The Warriors brought in veteran center Joe Barry Carroll to help mentor Washburn on the court, but the rookie had little support once he left practice. Long used to getting his way, Washburn quickly discovered the Warriors veterans weren’t going to go easy on him. He had to carry his teammates’ bags, a traditional form of rookie hazing in sports, and when he happened to win a post-practice shooting contest for cash, the vets sometimes refused to pay him. “I was 20 years old in the Bay Area being a grown man, but still a kid,” Washburn said. “…I showed back at them in so many ways by getting high.”

    To this day, Washburn wonders if Julius Erving could have become the mentor he needed. When the Philadelphia 76ers played the Warriors early in Washburn’s rookie season, Erving approached Washburn before the game and asked if they could meet afterward at the Sixers’ hotel. At the time, Washburn was living at the hotel. When Erving showed up to meet him, he was high.

    “Do you know I stood there and looked at Dr. J through a peep hole until he left my door,” Washburn said. “I never opened it up. Would that have been my savior right there? I will never know. He extended a hand. I just didn’t accept it.”

    Erving wasn’t the only person who appeared to want to help. Washburn eventually purchased a luxurious home in Oakland Hills where Reggie Jackson and Rickey Henderson were among his neighbors. Henderson, Washburn said, once came by to introduce himself.

    “I shook his hand, slammed the door and went back to getting high,” Washburn said.




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Washburn’s drug problem affected his work with the team. On some game nights, he’d arrive minutes before tipoff. He also stopped attending practices. The way Washburn looked at it, he stood to lose less money in fines if he skipped practice altogether ($10,000) than if he showed up and the team realized he was high (as much as $20,000).

    “It was a progression,” said former Warriors guard Purvis Short, a teammate of Washburn’s. “After a couple weeks or couple months of that, you started to suspect there were some things going on. “There wasn’t a lot of information out there in terms of how to help somebody. There wasn’t a lot of information we had as his teammates on some of the things we could’ve perhaps done. We were out there more or less in uncharted waters.”

    A little more than three months into his first season, Washburn checked into a drug rehabilitation clinic in Van Nuys, Calif. After returning to the Warriors in late March, he finished his disappointing rookie campaign averaging 3.8 points and 2.9 rebounds in 35 games.

    Washburn’s stay in rehab didn’t help much. He continued to use, and his weekends often began with a trip to the bank. He’d withdraw as much as $20,000 to spend on drugs and prostitutes.

    By Monday morning, he was back at the bank taking out more money. Of the $1.25 million he made during his brief NBA career, Washburn thinks he lost more than $1 million.

    “If you look at the hookers I was buying back then, the hotels – paying for folks’ rent because I didn’t like sitting in folks’ houses and getting high with no lights on. I paid to have the lights on,” he said. “I was hanging with folks that didn’t have running water. We had to go in the bathroom and **** in buckets.

    “I had a 6,000-square-foot house built on the side of a mountain, but I’m lying on the floor with no carpet, dirty, because I don’t want to leave the drugs.”




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Don Nelson took over as the Warriors’ general manager before the start of Washburn’s second season. By training camp, he’d seen enough and told Karl the team would be better off trading Washburn. On Dec. 15, 1987, they sent Washburn to the Atlanta Hawks for the draft rights to Ken Barlow. Barlow never played in the NBA.

    “Everything negative,” Nelson recently said of Washburn. “Lazy. Bad attitude. With his skill level, you projected that if he did everything right, he could get better. He didn’t do anything right.”

    Washburn said he would have been better off had the Warriors sent him to Utah or Portland. Atlanta, he figured, was no place for an addict, and he was right. His tenure with the Hawks covered just 29 games. By June of 1989, Washburn’s stay in the NBA was over; he’d failed his third drug test to earn a lifetime suspension from the league. His career had spanned a total of 72 games.

    Washburn moved to Houston where he lived on the streets for a couple of years. “I was eating out of trash cans. I was sleeping in abandoned buildings, abandoned houses. I was doing whatever was needed to survive at that time,” he said. “I was staying in the same clothes for weeks, maybe months at a time to a point where the [drug dealers] I was buying my stuff from would even pay me to go and change clothes.”

    Washburn eventually ended up in behind bars, serving 12- and 13-month sentences for drug-related offenses from 1991-94, the second coming after a parole violation. While in prison, he returned to the basketball court.

    “A couple years prior to that I was on the NBA floor in front of thousands,” Washburn said. “Now I’m on the penitentiary floor playing against guys wearing flip-flops, Army boots. Instead of cheerleaders on the sidelines, we had guys with Kool-Aid on their lips and stuff painted on their face looking like girls. It was always like a movie for me. It was so surreal.”

    Except it also was his life. When he wasn’t in jail, Washburn landed some jobs playing professionally in Greece, Switzerland, Puerto Rico, the Continental Basketball Association and United States Basketball League. Former NBA player and coach John Lucas(notes), who has spent much of his career helping players fight substance abuse, helped shepherd Washburn into nearly a dozen rehab centers, none of which seemed to help.

    Washburn says he finally went clean on June 17, 2000. A month ago, he said, he passed his decade-long run of sobriety. He claims food is now his biggest vice.

    “I just got tired of reaching in my pockets and having no money,” Washburn said. “I got tired of asking my momma at 70-something years old for $20 or $30 being a grown man.”




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Washburn now speaks to addicts on Saturdays at the Dallas Life Foundation Center. In February, Short saw Washburn at All-Star weekend and invited him to speak at the National Basketball Players Association’s Top 100 Camp in Virginia for high school players.

    “It had a tremendous impact on the kids because Chris spoke from the heart,” Short said. “He just told it like it was.”

    Washburn’s message: Stay humble. Learn from him. He had a chance to become a star in the NBA and he wasted it.

    “Once I did find out I wasn’t special, it was hard for me to overcome,” Washburn said. “I only used the NBA to get through certain doors.

    “The NBA opens up some doors that shouldn’t be opened up.”
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

    And yet history keeps repeating itself with sports players. You'd think they would learn by now that drugs aren't the answer.

    I'm glad that he's got himself cleaned up. Truly a sad story with a pleasant ending. Keep up the good work Washburn!
    First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

      Look at that draft - that was Donnie's first and to come out of that disaster with Chuck Person was an interesting combination of preparation and opportunity (plus some good ol' lying on Donnie's part to make sure the Knicks didn't trade around us to get Rifleman.)

      But I disagree with one other premise - Roy Tarpley was the best of the drugged-out players. He could have been a top-ten alltime PF if he was sober.
      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
      And life itself, rushing over me
      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

        Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
        But I disagree with one other premise - Roy Tarpley was the best of the drugged-out players. He could have been a top-ten alltime PF if he was sober.
        As a Big Ten fan, I remember Tarpley well. He was at Michigan when I was in college. He has to be one of the biggest wastes of pure talent in NBA history. IMO, he had Duncan level talent at worst if he had stayed sober.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

          Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
          But I disagree with one other premise - Roy Tarpley was the best of the drugged-out players. He could have been a top-ten alltime PF if he was sober.
          You are probably right on Tarpley, he was really good. But he had a chance to show himself in the NBA. Wasburn never gave himself that chance, so who knows

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

            After both Keith Lee & William Bedford I gave up ever trying to figure out which college player would or would not be good in the NBA. I honestly thought Lee would be a star in the league and that Bedford would be a rock solid addition to any club and that he would have a long career filled with several all-star apperances.

            Now I just wait for Seth to tell me what to think.

            P.S. Tarpley was by far the best of the three. Dude was a legit big man with lots of skill


            Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

              Great article man

              What a shame, but God works in mysterious ways so maybe its all for the better. Washburn should speak to all rookies
              Sittin on top of the world!

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

                I guess in response to your question, "No, I've never really wondered (or cared) what happened to Chris Washburn".

                We've had a few players through the years that had a lot of rumors circulating about their character before they ever were drafted.

                Washburn was one that fell into that category. Practically everyone knew that he had serious problems before he ever got to the pros. Yet, his talents were so immense that a team (probably several others as well) was willing to take the risk and draft him with a high draft pick.

                I see players of this nature and to be honest, it just totally whizzes me off. To have that much talent at the occupation that you totally love and and just totally waste it.

                I have a hard time feeling sympathy for such players. They are not like the player who plays his heart out, totally earns our respect, and tragically sustains a career-ending injury. A player like Washburn had choices. He just refused to see, or was unable to see, or just plain didnt care about the consequences of his own actions.
                Last edited by beast23; 07-17-2010, 03:38 PM.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

                  That is too bad that all of his talent was wasted because of this disease that took him in the prime time of his life. As a counselor I see similar situations all of the time where someone has to lose everything before they are able to commit to recovery.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

                    And yet history keeps repeating itself with sports players. You'd think they would learn by now that drugs aren't the answer.
                    The problem is that in each case you can't say "by now" because it's their first time through it. It's not like Washburn keeps getting drafted and F'n up over and over.

                    And then the other major problem with the war on drug is they never tell the kids how awesome drugs are. People don't abuse drugs because it sucks. So a kid tries coke and feels like a god and wonderful and unstoppable. That's a good feeling.

                    What things in life that feel wonderful do we typically quit doing? Do you stop having sex after the first time, stop swimming, playing sports, going to concerts, eating good (tasty) food?

                    Nope. You go to a Pacers game as a kid and then keep trying to go back. Heck, I sat down close one time and it was over for me. I gave up going to more games or having money for other things in my life just to recapture that feeling of sitting down low at a game.


                    So instead of saying "oh, don't spend money on 3rd row Pacers seats, that's horrible, that's a bad thing" you have to let kids know that they will like it and that this will be the problem. That unlike other things it's so good that it just destroys you. You need to be a little afraid of how good it will make you feel.

                    And then you need to give them an optional outlet for a lesser but more sustainable positive feeling, like sports. Ironic in this case of course.

                    Maybe if someone had taken Washburn to Alaska for some fishing and camping, let him breathe that kind of morning air and feel a unique moment that he likely had never experienced before, and then told him that with the money he'd make he could repeat that experience virtually forever without a downward trend and consuming obsession then maybe he could have avoided his mistakes.


                    But instead all these programs and agents and teams keep feeding them just the opposite, they use the most destructive vices to lure them to their greedy ends. The reason they do is because those vices are like sugar vs veggies, they give the instant gratification rather than the delayed benefit.

                    Until we have the best interest of these kids at heart they'll never escape these issues.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: ever wonder what ever happened to Chris Washburn

                      Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post

                      You need to be a little afraid of how good it will make you feel.
                      I really like your post...and especially this point.

                      I think this is a big reason why some people make the right choices in life and others do not. The fear though has more to do with being smart enough to see the end result of your actions.

                      Comment

                      Previous template Next
                      Working...
                      X