PDA

View Full Version : Old SI story about Slick Leonard



BobbyMac
06-11-2009, 04:39 PM
This is a good read:
:) (http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1094437/1/index.htm)
http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1094437/1/index.htm

Slick Pinkham
06-11-2009, 05:06 PM
very nice article and a good account of the severe financial hardship brought on by the merger (high entry fee, no TV money for 3 years, no draft in year 1) and the telethon that quite literally saved the franchise from folding.

ABADays
06-11-2009, 05:50 PM
For those of us who were fans throughout all this - it was pretty tense. It's sad how we are still paying to play in the NBA.

aceace
06-11-2009, 11:29 PM
For those of us who were fans throughout all this - it was pretty tense. It's sad how we are still paying to play in the NBA.I can honestly say that with this economy I have been worried about the team. The money that the Pacers pay to the old St Louis(aba) owners would go a long way to solving problems here. If the Pacers have been losing massive amounts as the Simons say then how much longer before they sell.

imawhat
06-12-2009, 01:02 AM
That was a great read. It's amazing how much the game has changed, inside and out. I couldn't imagine Slick coaching today.

count55
06-12-2009, 08:27 AM
Another great book about the NBA from this time frame is Breaks of the Game (http://www.amazon.com/Breaks-Game-David-Halberstam/dp/1401309720/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1244809617&sr=8-1) by David Halberstam.

ChicagoJ
06-12-2009, 12:17 PM
I can honestly say that with this economy I have been worried about the team. The money that the Pacers pay to the old St Louis(aba) owners would go a long way to solving problems here. If the Pacers have been losing massive amounts as the Simons say then how much longer before they sell.

Keep in mind those payments are in perpetuity. The new owners would have to pay them too, regardless of whether the team is here or elsewhere.

Bball
06-12-2009, 01:15 PM
Keep in mind those payments are in perpetuity. The new owners would have to pay them too, regardless of whether the team is here or elsewhere.

It's amazing after all these years a loophole couldn't be found in a contract that is so one-sided.

What happens if the Pacers 'fold' and then a 'new' Pacer franchise and ownership group would arise from the ashes willing to play in Indy? I suppose the entry fees would negate the benefit of those type of shenagins being worth the effort.

If it was me I think I'd assign a lawfirm with the task of getting me out of this agreement and then push it (trying to get other former ABA teams to share the cost and join in). Meanwhile I'd try and lobby the league behind closed doors to be a participant in buying out the ABA owners for the health of ALL NBA franchises. Then, with the lawsuit looming in one corner, and a potential settlement in another, take the gloves off and try and end this thing once and for all.

...or maybe I'm naive and this has been tried...
I just think in this day and age, with the contract proving to be so costly to one side and so beneficial to the other, the scales could be tipped a little differently in a modern courtroom.

-Bball

danman
06-12-2009, 01:22 PM
Loved Slick. Coaching days never end well, and the late 70's were a low point. Believe it or not, it was considered uncool for a player to cheer his own team from the bench.

The NBA really had it in for the ABA and made a point of hammering the 4 teams that came over. Red Auerbach was particularly disdainful.

Truth is, the ABA spirit and rules had a lot to do with bringing the NBA back. Without that Dr. J style, the daring pass and fast break and dunk, Magic and Bird wouldn't have been Magic and Bird.

As a lad, I sweated bullets during that telethon. Ha.