PDA

View Full Version : NEXT YEARS STARTING FIVE? YOU PICK?



IndianaMan
06-20-2004, 02:32 AM
WHAT DO YOU THINK OUR STARTING FIVE WILL BE NEXT YEAR AND IF U WANT TO PUT IN A COUPLE FA'S THAT MIGHT BE BACKUPS. HERES MINE.

PG-Tinsley (id like to see fisher) Brewer ya thats right no AJ we will trade him
SG-McGrady(REG/jones)
SF-Artest (Bowen would be nice but dont see it Dont know of ne otha fa sf's
PF-J. O'neal (Cro)
C- Blount (Fiesty Foster)

Young
06-20-2004, 02:33 AM
Can we wait till draft day? JK.

Hicks
06-20-2004, 02:35 AM
WHAT IS WITH SOME PEOPLE'S LOVE OF THE CAPSLOCK !

hoopsforlife
06-20-2004, 09:00 AM
Miller
Tinsley
O'Neal
Harrington
Foster

PacerStud
06-20-2004, 09:24 AM
PG
SG
C
SF
PF

MSA2CF
06-20-2004, 10:20 AM
PG
SG
C
SF
PF

:sarcasm:

Snickers
06-20-2004, 04:24 PM
Shaq - Dampier
Malone -
McGrady - .44
Miller -
Brewer - Telfair

:dance:

:sarcasm:

But seriously....

Foster
O'neal
Artest
Miller/new 2-guard if we get one
Tinsley

Steveman
06-20-2004, 06:54 PM
Tinsley
Pierce (or) Allen
Artest
ONeal
Blount (or) Dampier (or) Foster

:laugh:

MSA2CF
06-20-2004, 07:42 PM
I don't really want to do this now, but it builds up the ol' post count.

PG Jamaal Tinsley
SG Reggie Miller
SF Ron Artest
PF Jermaine O'Neal
C Jeff Foster

No major changes, mostly because, none needed.

Steveman
06-20-2004, 09:17 PM
I don't really want to do this now, but it builds up the ol' post count.

PG Jamaal Tinsley
SG Reggie Miller
SF Ron Artest
PF Jermaine O'Neal
C Jeff Foster

No major changes, mostly because, none needed.

What exactly do you consider a major change? Your lineup indicates no change's what so ever, and doing nothing while the Miami's, Milwaukee's, and Cleveland's improve, and Detroit (a division rival) being reigning world champions, will get us a first or second round exit, frankly, there will be changes. Adding a quality SG would not be a major change if we can do it with out sacrificing JO, Ron, or Tinsley ... that is the core of this Pacers team, and maybe Foster.

Management will add a consistent outside shooter in the off season. How they will do it is unknown, but you can bet they will.

PacerStud
06-20-2004, 09:28 PM
Well, if we don't make a trade it could be:
PG
SF
SF
SF
PF
That's an Isiah lineup. Remember the 'interchangeable' players thing ?? Everyone could play every position on the court ?? That was quickly abandoned.

ChicagoJ
06-20-2004, 10:41 PM
PG
SG
C
SF
PF

Well, if we don't make a trade it could be:
PG
SF
SF
SF
PF

:laugh:


Well, if we don't make a trade it could be:
PG
SF
SF
SF
PF
That's an Isiah lineup. Remember the 'interchangeable' players thing ?? Everyone could play every position on the court ?? That was quickly abandoned.

The point is we've still got an unbalanced, Isiah-like Roster. The idea may have been abandoned, but the roster is still mostly in place.

:(

MSA2CF
06-20-2004, 10:50 PM
What exactly do you consider a major change? Your lineup indicates no change's what so ever.....

I consider a major change "losing"/adding 5 players. Yes, you are correct. My lineup indicates no changes, in the starting lineup. I believe there will be changes, but not drastic enough to change the starting lineup. Again, I really didn't want to do this now. I should have waited until August or September.

Miller_time04
06-20-2004, 11:27 PM
Tinsley
Pierce
Blount
Artest or Al
JO

sweabs
06-20-2004, 11:44 PM
Tinsley
Jones
Artest
Jermaine
Foster

Hicks
06-20-2004, 11:50 PM
Tinsley
New SG
Artest or Al or JB
O'Neal
Foster or New C