PDA

View Full Version : If Tom Brady and Eli Manning were bikers...



Shade
02-09-2008, 02:27 PM
Well..I'll let you figure out who's who. :D

TwXThquznA0

Hoop
02-11-2008, 12:36 AM
I already posted that in the "GIANTS WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" thread. It cracks me up every time though.

Here's my favorite Pats video:

<object height="355" width="425">

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/y3VGZL5Q8lk&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></object>

BoomBaby31
02-11-2008, 03:15 AM
lol hahaaha pretty much what happen to the Pats.

heywoode
02-11-2008, 02:37 PM
That Hitler one is the coolest video I've ever seen!

Hoop
02-11-2008, 07:20 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v94/Hooping/BradyGoesDown2.jpg

Shade
02-12-2008, 05:40 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v94/Hooping/BradyGoesDown2.jpg
:laugh: :D

Hoop
02-12-2008, 09:32 PM
Fizy's is an obnoxious Pats fan that does webcasts for every game. He is usually pretty funny, and obnoxious<object height="355" width="425">, this is him having to eat some humble pie.

Fitzy's We Blew Super Bowl 42 Webcast (warning, bad language) :laugh:
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QNIl2uCPwWs&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></object>

Hoop
02-12-2008, 09:40 PM
An oldie but goodie, relevant again with the new spygate information.

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0EU1O-hGxgg&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0EU1O-hGxgg&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

Slick Pinkham
02-13-2008, 08:38 AM
relevant again with the new spygate information.


What new spygate information? I am sure that you know this, but there is no new information from any source, either "on or off the record"

The ESPN ombudsman described the entire scope of the story succintly:

[Walsh] "hinted" that he might or might not have evidence that he might or might not divulge about whether or not the Patriots engaged in more spying than was previously known.

Why would ESPN.com run a story so potentially damaging to the Patriots on the basis of murky allegations from a source who, as one reader/journalist put it, "should give anyone in our business a good case of the squirms"?

....[ESPN] may have helped give a huge amplified megaphone to an unreliable source...

"I hope, for ESPN's sake, that there is some meat behind the sizzle on this story. Otherwise, I would be very disappointed at the sensationalistic nature of this sequence of events."

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=schreiber_leanne&id=3240223

campy
02-13-2008, 07:24 PM
What is with Mike Shannahan in the last video?