Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

    'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

    Pacers' Leonard, 75, excited about 3 more years on radio
    By Mark Montieth

    mark.montieth@indystar.com
    August 12, 2007

    He just turned 75 and has been spending more quality time with doctors than he prefers, but Bob Leonard is ready to strap himself in for another roller-coaster ride.

    The Indiana Pacers' former coach plans to continue his role as a radio analyst for the next three years, a decision that will become official when he puts his signature on an agreed-upon contract later this week.

    That will mark the continuation of his partnership with play-by-play voice Mark Boyle, which dates to the 1993 playoffs, as well as his role as goodwill ambassador for the franchise.

    An NBA player from 1956-63 and a consultant, coach or broadcaster with the Pacers throughout most of their 40 seasons, Leonard has experienced all the peaks and valleys a franchise can endure. That's why he views the Pacers with a wide-angle lens rather than focusing on the off-court issues of the past few years, or on last season's losing record -- its first in 10 years.

    "It's a roller coaster," he said. "There are so many examples of it through the years. I've seen it all. Things can change quickly.

    "Everything is headed in the right direction."

    Leonard bases that opinion on his respect for new coach Jim O'Brien and his trust in CEO Donnie Walsh and team president Larry Bird to restore order and achievement.

    He also bases it on the perspective that comes from his history with the franchise. He remembers when the front office was housed in a small building on 38th Street, with just one secretary. He remembers the bus rides to Louisville to play the Kentucky Colonels in the ABA heyday, when the team stopped at a truck stop in Seymour to eat dinner before the game and drove home after the game. He remembers the smoke-filled Coliseum at the State Fairgrounds, which held fewer than 10,000 fans in a bare-bones environment.

    "I meet people who are in their 50s, and their parents brought them to the (Pepsi) Coliseum to the ballgames," he said. "I want to see parents bring their kids to the ballgames now and let them grow up with the Pacers.

    "The progress here has been tremendous. We've built two new arenas. Market Square Arena revitalized Downtown, and Conseco Fieldhouse is the best arena in the country. New York's still sitting there with Madison Square Garden. That place is so antiquated, it's awful."

    Leonard feels a bit antiquated himself some days. He had heart surgery a few years ago, and might require another one. He has an aortic aneurism that doctors measure every six months. If it grows, a difficult operation will become necessary. He had genuine doubts at the end of last season if he would be able to return, but so far doctors approve.

    "You never know," he said. "That's something I'm going to have to keep on top of."

    He recently had surgery on his right eye to implant a lens in his cataract, and will have surgery on the left eye Monday. It's an indication of how well-connected Leonard has become that his surgeon, Dr. John Abrams, was a ballboy at the Coliseum during the years when Leonard was coaching the Pacers to three ABA titles.

    Leonard, however, still has plenty of energy to back his enthusiasm. He recently power-washed and sealed his driveway by himself. He's heading to southern Indiana to spend a few days with former Pacers guard Don Buse on Tuesday. He shoots in the 90s on the golf course, making the clutch shots that win bets.

    He figures the contract he signs soon will be his last. But then who knows where a roller-coaster ride leads?

    "You want to be able to do the job," he said. "Eighty-two games is a bunch. That's three college seasons. I can't go like I used to.

    "But I still enjoy it. If I'm feeling good three years from now, we'll see what kind of job I've done and how the Pacers feel about me."
    PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

    That's great news, it's not gonna be the same when Slick & Mark aren't the radio voices anymore.

    It's also good to hear that his health is in good enough condition to allow him to stay around the game he loves.

    There probably isn't a bigger database of knowledge about basketball, anywhere in the state, than Slick Leonard.

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

      has there been any word about a possible Jim O'Brien Show?
      This is the darkest timeline.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

        Hope so, it would only be appropriate based on tradition

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

          It would be nice to get a third voice on the radio. Easing another voice in may take away the shock of not having Slick.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

            Originally posted by avoidingtheclowns View Post
            has there been any word about a possible Jim O'Brien Show?
            I e-mailed Kevin Lee about that on June 27th.

            Here's the response I received:

            I've not heard if Jim O'Brien will have a show, but I believe we'll at least have Mark Boyle on in that time slot each week and my guess is Jim will do a show.

            Maybe Mark can give us an update if he happens to wander in......
            PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

              the beauty is Slick never left...so he doesn't belong in that group of comeback attempts

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

                Originally posted by MagicRat View Post
                I e-mailed Kevin Lee about that on June 27th.

                Here's the response I received:

                I've not heard if Jim O'Brien will have a show, but I believe we'll at least have Mark Boyle on in that time slot each week and my guess is Jim will do a show.

                Maybe Mark can give us an update if he happens to wander in......
                cool. thanks MR
                This is the darkest timeline.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

                  Pacer Savants,

                  Though I don't know for certain whether Jim will be doing a radio show, I do know that our broadcast management folks are trying to get something done.

                  Hope everyone is enjoying the summer.

                  MJB

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

                    Originally posted by mboyle1313 View Post
                    Pacer Savants
                    Quoted for LG's benefit.

                    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

                      Originally posted by intridcold View Post
                      It would be nice to get a third voice on the radio. Easing another voice in may take away the shock of not having Slick.
                      It is going to be hard not hearing Slicks voice along with the pacers, when the time does come. Replacing him is going to be hard, we have some of the best broadcasters in the business. I always compare others to the Pacers Guys and there is just no comparison. I was watching the Oakland Raiders Preseason game, and they are horrible. They have good knowledge but no presentation. The lakers guys, are equally as bad. I always get the NBA League Pass so I get to listen to many out of market games and I haven't heard any that compare. It is a treat to listen to all these broadcasters.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

                        Whats really gonna hurt is Didn't Mark say when Slick is done, he's probably done?

                        I will really miss the combo, but its gonna hurt all that worse if we lose both of them at the same time.

                        We have one of the Best Duo's in the NBA. I have many memories with Mark and Slick on the radio that will never be topped, especially when Reggie was playing.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Re: 'Slick' -- He's back, baby!

                          Originally posted by Kegboy View Post
                          Quoted for LG's benefit.

                          He knows not what he does.

                          Knowing our luck, he'll be replaced by Ryan Seacrest (what job hasn't he gotten).

                          Comment

                          Previous template Next
                          Working...
                          X