Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

    This is a debate I've been involved with over the last couple of years now, and am interested in hearing people's feelings here on the subject. Especially those of our "less-biased" posters, such as DisplacedKnick, Kstat, PistonsDynasty, dipperdunk, etc.

    I think there's little to no doubt that Reggie is a future HOFer, but does he belong on the fabled "Top 50" list?

  • #2
    Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

    It all depends on what you value most in choosing the players.

    If you are going to classify a great player with heavy weight on what they did in the crunch..Yes miller deserves to be there.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

      yes. no question.
      Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

        Yes, but I also believe Joe Dumars is too.

        It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

        Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
        Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
        NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

          The 50 greatest players is a flawed concept because there is no way quantify what great is and there for bias heavily influences the selection.

          Having said that I would include Miller because of his contributions to the league. When clips are shown of the big moments from the 90's always there are two or three of Miller. While some SG's are argueble more talented such as Richmond or Drexler niether had any moments comparable to the ones Reggie has had.
          "They could turn out to be only innocent mathematicians, I suppose," muttered Woevre's section officer, de Decker.

          "'Only.'" Woevre was amused. "Someday you'll explain to me how that's possible. Seeing that, on the face of it, all mathematics leads, doesn't it, sooner or later, to some kind of human suffering."

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

            The 50 greatest players is a flawed concept because there is no way quantify what great is and there for bias heavily influences the selection.

            Having said that I would include Miller because of his contributions to the league. When clips are shown of the big moments from the 90's always there are two or three of Miller. While some SG's are argueble more talented such as Richmond or Drexler niether had any moments comparable to the ones Reggie has had.
            That's my point. What makes a player great?

            There are enough players in the league today talented enough to fill half those spots already.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

              My answer's a no but it's a bit of a hesitant no compared to where I was a few years ago.

              But if I had to give my reasons why:

              Never won an NBA title
              Never been 1st team all-NBA (has he ever been 2nd team? I think he was third-team once or twice)
              Pretty one-dimensional player

              One of the big problems is how you rate a modern player like Reggie compared with old-timers. The longevity we see in lots of players today just didn't exist back then. Frex, what do you do with Neil Johnston? Or Paul Arizin? Those guys were dominant players and retired at their peaks, partly because they weren't making a whole lot of money. If you divided the league into pre and post-1965 players I'd say he'd probably be in.

              Reggie's certainly had the longevity. Anyway, the above reasons are why I'm voting no for now but I'd really have to sit down with a full list of everyone who ever played in the NBA and make up my own list to be sure - Reggie could get in toward the end of my list. It's not a drop-dead no from me at this point.
              The poster formerly known as Rimfire

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

                Off the top of my head I would say yes he definitely belongs in the top 50 because he is one of the best postseason performers in the history of the league.

                I just looked over the list and IMO Reggie was better then Pippen, Parish, Bing and Drexler. I thought Wilkins should have been in the top 50 as he averaged 25 pts. a game for his career and I also feel Bernard King should be in the top 50 I mean the guy averaged 33 pts. a game one year for the Knicks. So according to my opinion if you bumped those 4 players I mentioned above and add King and Wilkins that would leave 2 possible spots for Reggie. Reggie's problem would be when you start to include current players he would probably get bumped.

                Possible current players who may move ahead of Reggie and bump him out of the top 50.

                Duncan
                Garnett
                Kobe
                Iverson
                JO
                McGrady

                Plus I'm sure there are some current players I'm missing. So my opinion is yes he belongs in the top 50 but he will probably get bumped by some of the current players when their careers are completed.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

                  There's got to be room for Reggie.

                  He's scored more 3-point shots than any player in history - that alone should be enough.

                  ...and if you say he's one-dimesional, than take Wilt and Shaq off the list too.

                  He's one of the top 10 or so scorers in NBA history, has broken almost every major franchise record in existence, and he's played more minutes for the same team in NBA history besides Stockton and Malone, I believe. I mean jeez, AT THE VERY LEAST he's the Cal Ripken of the NBA...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

                    There's got to be room for Reggie.

                    He's scored more 3-point shots than any player in history - that alone should be enough.

                    ...and if you say he's one-dimesional, than take Wilt and Shaq off the list too.

                    He's one of the top 10 or so scorers in NBA history, has broken almost every major franchise record in existence, and he's played more minutes for the same team in NBA history besides Stockton and Malone, I believe. I mean jeez, AT THE VERY LEAST he's the Cal Ripken of the NBA...
                    The part about Shaq & Wilt just doesn't hold water for me.

                    How can you say they are one dimensional.

                    Wilt is one of the greatest scorers in history, the greatest rebounder in history, would be the greatest shot blocker in history (if they would have kept record of that back then) & even one time led the league in assist.

                    Shaq is a dominant scorer, great rebounder, great shot blocker, great defender.

                    How exactly are either of them one dimensional? Because they don't step out & hit the three?


                    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

                      the 50:

                      Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
                      Nate Archibald
                      Paul Arizin
                      Charles Barkley
                      Rick Barry
                      Elgin Baylor
                      Dave Bing
                      Larry Bird
                      Wilt Chamberlain
                      Bob Cousy
                      Dave Cowens
                      Billy Cunningham
                      Dave DeBusschere
                      Clyde Drexler
                      Julius Erving
                      Patrick Ewing
                      Walt Frazier
                      George Gervin
                      Hal Greer
                      John Havlicek
                      Elvin Hayes
                      Magic Johnson
                      Sam Jones
                      Michael Jordan
                      Jerry Lucas
                      Karl Malone
                      Moses Malone
                      Pete Maravich
                      Kevin McHale
                      George Mikan
                      Earl Monroe
                      Hakeem Olajuwon
                      Shaquille O'Neal
                      Robert Parish
                      Bob Pettit
                      Scottie Pippen
                      Willis Reed
                      Oscar Robertson
                      David Robinson
                      Bill Russell
                      Dolph Schayes
                      Bill Sharman
                      John Stockton
                      Isiah Thomas
                      Nate Thurmond
                      Wes Unseld
                      Bill Walton
                      Jerry West
                      Lenny Wilkens
                      James Worthy

                      I may be old, but I'm not old enough to fairly judge these guys: Arizin, Mikan, Greer, Schayes, Sharman.

                      I want to add in Dominique Wilkins and Bob McAdoo. Who do I take off? I'm guessing DeBusschere and Pippen.

                      Add in reggie, and whom to take off? An old guy I know little about? That's easy, but maybe not fair.

                      I'd have to argue that Reggie was better than Maravich, Wes Unseld, Bill Walton, or Sam Jones. It depends upon how you value longevity and playoff heroics. As a kid I loved Pete Maravich, but he was a big scorer on bad teams (New Orleans) and then was a good player but not a star late in his career with the Celtics. It helped that he was flashy, but I don't care about that.

                      I could put Reggie in over Pete, but it's not an easy choice. I could also put him in over Walton, and admit that it's only due to Walton's bad feet and short career that he's not top 50, or even top 10 for than matter, which I think he would have been if healthy.
                      The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

                        as side to the Walton thought- People give him credit for "what might have been" with regard to the injuries that wrecked his career.

                        We don't seem to give the same leeway to Bernard King and David Thompson.

                        Yeah, Thompson's was self-inflicted (drugs), and King didn't win a title. I guess that's it.

                        Bill would not be in MY top 50.
                        The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

                          as side to the Walton thought- People give him credit for "what might have been" with regard to the injuries that wrecked his career.

                          We don't seem to give the same leeway to Bernard King and David Thompson.

                          Yeah, Thompson's was self-inflicted (drugs), and King didn't win a title. I guess that's it.

                          Bill would not be in MY top 50.
                          Same here on Walton. And at the time this list was put together Shaq had only been in the league about 5 years - I wouldn't have had him in there either.

                          As I said before, my guess is that if I started my own list from scratch that Reggie would be one of about 30-40 players in contention for my final 10 or so spots.

                          I thought the Knicks had a bias myself in this. You've mentioned Debusscher (sp) - Earl Monroe IMO isn't top 50 either. Great player but not that great (though I'll do battle for Walt Frazier). I'd put Gail Goodrich in over the Pearl.

                          But if I was going to do it justice I'd really have to start from scratch - and the hardest part is judging the old-timers. Do you rank them relative to their peers or go by numbers? Because even for George Mikan the career numbers aren't that great compared with modern players. Different game.
                          The poster formerly known as Rimfire

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

                            There's got to be room for Reggie.

                            He's scored more 3-point shots than any player in history - that alone should be enough.

                            ...and if you say he's one-dimesional, than take Wilt and Shaq off the list too.

                            He's one of the top 10 or so scorers in NBA history, has broken almost every major franchise record in existence, and he's played more minutes for the same team in NBA history besides Stockton and Malone, I believe. I mean jeez, AT THE VERY LEAST he's the Cal Ripken of the NBA...
                            The part about Shaq & Wilt just doesn't hold water for me.

                            How can you say they are one dimensional.

                            Wilt is one of the greatest scorers in history, the greatest rebounder in history, would be the greatest shot blocker in history (if they would have kept record of that back then) & even one time led the league in assist.

                            Shaq is a dominant scorer, great rebounder, great shot blocker, great defender.

                            How exactly are either of them one dimensional? Because they don't step out & hit the three?
                            Wilt is arguably the most complete player in NBA history, so I don't buy that for one second.

                            Shaq, however, is more of an abomination, a physical aberration, than anything else. For his size, he is NOT a great rebounder or shot blocker. He's a very good scorer, because nobody can match his physicality, but he's not even a good shooter. He's a good passer.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Is Reggie Miller one of the Top 50 players in NBA history?

                              Shade, If IU beats Purdue tomorrow, I say you can add the dancing banana beside their record!
                              The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X