Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

    From CBS Sportsline: http://www.sportsline.com/nba/story/9926475



    Lost among the fallout of the Allen Iverson trade and constant swirl of rumors around a possible deal involving Kevin Garnett, Jermaine O'Neal's words of warning almost weren't taken seriously.


    A little over a week ago, O'Neal -- clearly frustrated after his Indiana Pacers battled the red-hot Dallas Mavericks to the stretch before losing -- gave his take on the state of the team he has carried for most of the decade.

    Tired of doing the Eastern Conference shuffle -- win one, lose two, win two, lose one -- O'Neal suggested the Pacers trade him in the offseason.

    "If I can't take this team to another level, I truthfully believe we should go our separate ways at the end of the season," O'Neal told the Indianapolis Star. "I'm saying in general, the bottom line is you play to win. If we don't have a system set to win a championship, if we don't have the crew to win a championship, then what are we doing?" It has been easy to see why O'Neal is frustrated. Two wins away from the NBA Finals in 2004, the Pacers have not been close since. In fact, they are going backward, losing in the conference semifinals in 2005 and in the first round last year.

    This season began with a similar pattern. The Pacers could not get untracked, winning no more than two in a row and losing no more than three in a row in the first two months of the season.

    "We'll play extremely well one night, then come back the next game and play extremely bad," O'Neal said.

    After the loss in Dallas, Indiana was 17-16, good enough to feel secure about returning to the postseason for the 10th straight year but not good enough for O'Neal. The franchise player decided he was going to do something about it.

    O'Neal personally authorized Indiana's first three-game winning streak of the season, taking over down the stretch of wins over New Orleans and Boston -- two clubs that had beaten the Pacers earlier this season.

    To do that, however, O'Neal needed the ball, which he felt like was not coming to him enough for the team to be successful.

    "It's a very difficult situation because we have guys that can make shots, but at times when we are struggling and losing, I do want the ball in my hands," O'Neal said. "I have a lot of confidence in my teammates, but in a tough situation I want the ball in my hands. In any given matchup, I feel I can make plays. Even when I'm double-teamed, I can find the open guy to score for us." That premise isn't exactly the game plan of Pacers coach Rick Carlisle, who wants to play through O'Neal to make his teammates more effective.

    "We are not going to go out of our way to give Jermaine the ball 25-30 times a game but we can be creative and find ways to get him more involved," Carlisle said. "We have a lot of guys that can score for us, but we have to find a way to keep everyone involved." O'Neal's way has worked better of late. In the fourth quarter of the win at New Orleans, he scored nine points in just over seven minutes, including a pair of lefthanded layups as he demoralized defensive demon Tyson Chandler.

    In the final period of Tuesday's win at Boston, the Celtics had cut an 18-point deficit to 84-80 when O'Neal came off the bench and took over the game the way few NBA players can.

    On consecutive trips, he passed out of a double-team for a 3-pointer, grabbed a defensive rebound, drove for a three-point play and blocked a driving layup. Two trips later, he drained an elbow jumper, singlehandedly rebuilding the lead to double digits in less than three minutes.


    O'Neal often is forgotten when discussing the NBA's best players. Maybe it is because as an 11-year veteran with a lot of mileage on him, he is viewed as a player on the downswing.

    However, O'Neal is just 28 years old and appears to have plenty in his tank, as his league-leading 3.16 blocks attest. He is averaging his customary 19.2 points and 10.5 rebounds. His 3.0 assists are a career-best. Dwight Howard is the only player in the East with more double-doubles.

    "Jermaine is a great player, and the thing I always tell him is not to underestimate how much better he can make his teammates," Carlisle said. "Not only with his abilities on the court, but he has a leadership quality that makes him unique and a special player." Despite spending two-plus months doing the Eastern Conference shuffle, the Pacers are only four games behind Cleveland for first place in the Central Division and the top seed. The next two months offer a golden opportunity to put some wins together and make a move.

    After a rematch Friday with Dallas and visits to New Jersey and Miami, Indiana plays 14 of its next 17 games at home, with short trips to Detroit, Memphis and Toronto. It is not unlikely that the Pacers could enter March with a 34-20 mark, which makes them the '72 Lakers in the woeful East.

    O'Neal is happy about the winning streak but expects more of himself and his team.

    "I think it was a great sign, but we still have a lot of work to do to establish ourself as a competitive team," he said.

    If the Pacers want to hold onto their franchise player, they should feel the same way.
    So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

    If you've done 6 impossible things today?
    Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

    I wonder how JO feels after this latest loss to the Mavs. It looks like they gave it a much beter effort this time around, though. No shame in giving it your all and losing by 2 in overtime to arguably the best team in the league.

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

      Really ONE bad call cost us that game, if they had called that foul and put Granger on the line I think we would have won.

      But seriously JO needs to just shut up and play. Start concentrating on getting some 20-10 games.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

        Originally posted by Destined4Greatness View Post
        Really ONE bad call cost us that game, if they had called that foul and put Granger on the line I think we would have won.

        But seriously JO needs to just shut up and play. Start concentrating on getting some 20-10 games.
        He averages 20 and 10, ohh and 3 assists and 3 blocks. So he is concentrating.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

          Originally posted by Dat Dude View Post
          He averages 20 and 10, ohh and 3 assists and 3 blocks. So he is concentrating.
          I was just about to post that.

          D4G, I know you hate JO, but you have to admit that he's our best player right now, and has been playing at a high level the last few weeks. JO is the least of our problems.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

            I don't know how Jermaine doesn't win DPOY at this point. Between the blocks, rebounds, charges, rotations, and standup defense, he hasn't shown a weakness. I can't believe his rebounding numbers are so good. And, when's the last time someone went at him one-on-one? I can't even remember the last time someone posted up on him (and the odd thing is that it used to be his weakest defensive spot).


            Since that game in Boston, Jermaine has played consistently great basketball.

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

              He played great when I saw him live in Philly. And I'm not a big JO fanboy.
              "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

                Originally posted by Shade View Post
                I was just about to post that.

                D4G, I know you hate JO, but you have to admit that he's our best player right now, and has been playing at a high level the last few weeks. JO is the least of our problems.
                Quick way to lose credability is to rip on a player putting up MVP caliber numbers that are coming off a level of effort that's pretty obvious to most fans. He's running down plays to make blocks, he's fighting his way in for some of those rebounds, he's making great scoring plays right in the heart of the defense.

                So when you read "shut up and put up your numbers" when a guy IS doing that (and more) it sounds really trollish and bitter.


                It's fine to criticize, but if you can't also give credit when it comes due then what's the point?



                DPOY - if he keeps up this rate for the 2nd half, he'll be way up in the mix. People besides locals are noticing the charges taken, and I assume that by the end of the year that stat will be making the rounds at some level (either publically by 82games, or circulated among teams who discuss more detail statistics they keep - I'm sure RC will be happy to let them know if it comes to it ).

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

                  Originally posted by Dat Dude View Post
                  He averages 20 and 10, ohh and 3 assists and 3 blocks. So he is concentrating.
                  Thank you.

                  JO has easily been our MVP this year. He's playing at an amazing high level right now.

                  It's fun to watch.
                  Super Bowl XLI Champions
                  2000 Eastern Conference Champions




                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

                    Originally posted by Lord Helmet View Post
                    Thank you.

                    JO has easily been our MVP this year. He's playing at an amazing high level right now.

                    It's fun to watch.
                    JO is now the real leader of this team and does it the only way possible with his skill and effort. I am impressed with his performance.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: O'Neal expects more of Pacers, takes lead to start winning

                      Originally posted by Destined4Greatness View Post
                      (But seriously) JO needs to just shut up and play.
                      Averaging 19 ppg, 3 blks and 11 rbds per game isn't playing to you?

                      I think JO's doing a good job. And why shouldn't he be allowed to speak his mind? He is the team captain? Doesn't that afford him some latitude in voicing his opinion on the way the team has been playing or the direction the team is going? I thin his words were well-timed though maybe the wrong outlet to use (media vice going to mgmt/coach/team). But you can't deny his words seem to have lite a fire under some people. They had their first 3-game win streak, and even in the lose to Dallas, they played very well.

                      As far as I'm concerned, JO has earned the right to make his voice be heard.

                      Comment

                      Previous template Next
                      Working...
                      X