Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

This years team as of now = better than last year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This years team as of now = better than last year

    We lost cro/aj/scott/peja

    and we got Flight, Williams, Marquis, DA, Greene, Snap and BAston

    Honestly, why are people flipping out. Is Peja that much better than Quis? I don't think so and Peja is on the decline while Quis is on the rise. Obviously we are a team that is still making moves and I am pretty sure that we are going to move Sarunas.

    Also, I expect James White to be a solid contributor to this team next year. I REALLY believe he will surprise a lot of people.

    Anyways everyone had good expectations for our team with Peja. I look at it this way we lost Peja and got Quis. All the other moves are a wash, because were talking about 2nd/3rd rate players.

    I understand we don't have very much shooting, but we got a lot of slashers which is what you need in todays NBA. I mean what up Dwayne Wade. Also, I think we forget that Granger is a pretty good shooter and he is only improving. Teams can't get away with sagging off Jackson and Granger.

    I expect this team to probably get the 6th - 8th seed and possibly higher if we can do something solid with the TE.

    If we get Harrington we definitely need to move JO because Harrington is just a slightly less talented version of Jermaine. So if we get Al and can trade Jermaine for a scorer then I think this team can really do some damage.

    All I am saying is, our expectations shouldn't be THAT MUCH lower than the expectations we had for this team with Peja.
    *removed* Just keep politics and religion completely out of it, please.

  • #2
    Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

    I understand we don't have very much shooting, but we got a lot of slashers which is what you need in todays NBA. I mean what up Dwayne Wade.
    Dwayne Wade can shoot....

    The Last Pistons team I remember that was slasher-heavy was the 1998 edition. We had one guy that could hit a shot outside 15 feet. Bison Dele, Malik Sealy, Grant Hill, Lindsey Hunter Theo Ratliff Jerome WIlliams....

    We went 37-45. I still have nightmares of us racking up 15 offensive fouls per game because the other team knew we were going to drive the lane 9 out of every 10 times.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: This years team as of now = better than last year



      How much you selling the rose colored shades for?


      Comment


      • #4
        Re: This years team as of now = better than last year



        This year's team as of now = lottery

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

          I'll buy two pair! One for before the trade deadline and one after.

          Bird and Walsh will take the time up until the trade deadline to study the team and then they will make a move or two that will make as a real threat!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

            Originally posted by Jon Theodore View Post
            We lost cro/aj/scott/peja

            and we got Flight, Williams, Marquis, DA, Greene, Snap and BAston


            Honestly, why are people flipping out. Is Peja that much better than Quis? I don't think so and Peja is on the decline while Quis is on the rise. Obviously we are a team that is still making moves and I am pretty sure that we are going to move Sarunas.

            Also, I expect James White to be a solid contributor to this team next year. I REALLY believe he will surprise a lot of people.

            Anyways everyone had good expectations for our team with Peja. I look at it this way we lost Peja and got Quis. All the other moves are a wash, because were talking about 2nd/3rd rate players.

            I understand we don't have very much shooting, but we got a lot of slashers which is what you need in todays NBA. I mean what up Dwayne Wade. Also, I think we forget that Granger is a pretty good shooter and he is only improving. Teams can't get away with sagging off Jackson and Granger.

            I expect this team to probably get the 6th - 8th seed and possibly higher if we can do something solid with the TE.

            If we get Harrington we definitely need to move JO because Harrington is just a slightly less talented version of Jermaine. So if we get Al and can trade Jermaine for a scorer then I think this team can really do some damage.

            All I am saying is, our expectations shouldn't be THAT MUCH lower than the expectations we had for this team with Peja.

            Not to dog ya Jon 'cause I often agree with ya....but.......how much experience did we lose and how much did we gain???? THat's depending alot on guys with minimal experience at best (Anderson I'll give ya).
            Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

              Jon, one key thing you're missing is that the players we've lost are all veterans - while they weren't spectacular players, they know how to play in the NBA and know what it takes to win games in the NBA.

              The new players you listed are (basically) three non-lottery rookies, two walk-on level players (snap and baston) and DA who is waaaay past his prime and a year away from retirement. The only major plus there is Quis.

              Potentially, this is a better set of players. But RIGHT NOW? No. freakin. way. Also we dealt all our "chemistry" players and kept the "bad apples."

              I'm not trying to be pessimistic, but objectively I'd say we are at best around the same level as last year. And that's if Tins and J.O. are healthy.

              EDIT: I do agree that White could end up being the steal of the draft this year. Big if, though.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

                Originally posted by rabidpacersfan View Post
                Jon, one key thing you're missing is that the players we've lost are all veterans - while they weren't spectacular players, they know how to play in the NBA and know what it takes to win games in the NBA.
                Amen.

                We've lost most of the guys I considered reliable.

                What we have now is a team of youngsters and unreliable/injury prone players.

                It'll take a lot of luck to get us out of the lottery, whether it be Tins and Jax finding some consistency, the rooks playing out of their minds immediately, or Jermaine playing like we haven't seen in a few years.
                2010 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champion Baltimore Bulldogs

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

                  Cro, AJ and Pollard are solid, proven bench players who could start on some teams. Freddie is also gone and is a very good backup. Peja has been an NBA all-star and is still quite good.

                  In contrast, Flight, Williams, Snap, Baston and Greene are completely unproven rookies. Sure Baston and Greene have played a few NBA games, but if anything the fact they did not stick is a negative.

                  ...and DA is too old to be particularly effective. He was brought in to babysit and possibly take RC's job.

                  Now, Marquis is the one player who can help us, but not as much as the players who have gone. This is particularly true since we lack shooting more than slashing since we already have Granger and Jax for that task.

                  ...and yes, Peja is better than Quis until Quis proves otherwise. Quis will turn out to be a good player IMO, but Peja is still very valuable. Notice that the only games we won in last year's playoffs were when he was playing.

                  ...I do hope you are right about White. I do think you are right about him.

                  ...but what is this about Harrington being slightly less talented than JO. I am no JO fan and I even disagree with that. JO >>>>> Al

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

                    The chemistry problems, as far as I'm concerned, are still here. Therein lies the problem. That is not going to fix itself. It's went too far for that.

                    Management needs to roll up their sleeves, plot out a direction for this team, take their lumps, and do what needs to be done. Until then, they're painting the barn instead of planting corn.

                    -Bball
                    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                    ------

                    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                    -John Wooden

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

                      I guess the chemistry/veteran arguements are solid, but from a talent perspective we are better in my opinion. Fred Jones is horrible in my opinion, obviously I left him off the list. He can't dribble and is a turnover machine.

                      James White > Fred Jones.

                      I think you guys put a little bit too much emphasis on chemistry/veterans. I agree it is a big factor, but winning breeds chemistry and talent breeds winning.

                      I don't REALLY think the team as of now is BETTER that was just an attention getter. I'd say we are equal. To me I don't buy the veteran arguement much because, those veterans didn't win us many games. Granger was more of a difference maker than Cro ever was last year.

                      I WISH we were lottery bound, i think with one more really solid young guy this team would have an insanely talented youth group to build upon. I am just saying I expect us to be equally as good as we were last year, and if Tinsley can stay healthy obviously we will be better.
                      *removed* Just keep politics and religion completely out of it, please.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

                        I think we will stay playoff bound. I don't think people know how bad a team has to be to miss the playoffs in the East.

                        Are we better? Hard to say having not play a game yet and deals still being discussed.
                        "They could turn out to be only innocent mathematicians, I suppose," muttered Woevre's section officer, de Decker.

                        "'Only.'" Woevre was amused. "Someday you'll explain to me how that's possible. Seeing that, on the face of it, all mathematics leads, doesn't it, sooner or later, to some kind of human suffering."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

                          Someone's living in fantasy land.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

                            If Sarunas is half the player he was in Europe and Tinsley stays healthy, I'll say we're equal to last years team (post-Artest trade)...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: This years team as of now = better than last year

                              I'm more excited about this team for the simple fact that it's different than last year's teams. Losing Peja to gain Quis is a good deal to me. Losing Scot, for anything other than lockerroom presence, isn't that big of a deal as he had too many health issues. Losing Fred I counted on, and while he was a good spark off the bench, he was never quite as good as most of the hype lead you to believe (sorry P_G). Losing Cro is rough from a lockerroom, and AJ was productive (though many would argue inhibiting).

                              I'm not ready to call this team better than last year's, mainly because Tinsley and Jackson are still in town. I'll give them more exciting because of the rookies and Quis (heck, even Baston) - but I'm a little leary to say 'better' quite yet.
                              It's a new day for Pacers Basketball.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X