PDA

View Full Version : Dealing Jax and Tinman?



himikey
05-15-2006, 12:19 PM
IMHO I wouldn't be against making a deal for Starbury, although I can't see Larry bringing in another player with 'tude problems.

And, yes, Jax must go.

http://basketbawful.blogspot.com/2006/05/yet-another-bitter-pacers-fan-rant.html

Leisure Suit Larry
05-15-2006, 01:00 PM
Are you serious?? Jackson should stay, Tinsley maybe, but absolutely not to Marbury

Anthem
05-15-2006, 01:03 PM
:puke:

That is all.

Jon Theodore
05-15-2006, 01:06 PM
Why trade tinsley. He easily has the lowest trade value of any NBA player. We get nothing for him. We have gotten used to him not being a part of the roster, at this point hold onto him and anything you get out of him is just a bonus.

Tell me if im wrong, is there any remote chance we can get anything for Tinsley?

Isaac
05-15-2006, 01:18 PM
I could see the Rockets doing a Stromile Swift for Tinsley deal, but that's the best we could hope for, and he doesn't really fit in here.

Ragnar
05-15-2006, 01:24 PM
If Starbury becomes a Pacer I become a fan of a different team.

bread
05-15-2006, 01:33 PM
I want no part of Starbury. TPTB are trying to get the fans interested in the team again. If you think fans lost interest in this year's team, try putting that knucklehead out there. IMO there is nothing about him that the average Pacer fan would fall in love with.

As for getting anything for Tins... a rack of used basketballs would be enough for me. They would always be available and won't have an attitude. In a room full of hypochondriacs, Tinsley would be the Alpha Male.

jcouts
05-15-2006, 02:21 PM
I would think that all of the recent Larry Brown buyout hype would silence the Marbury trade rumors. Isiah has a choice between the two of them, and it looks like Brown is going to be hitting the road. Marbury sells tickets and jerseys, Brown doesn't.