Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

    Cowher transcript
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Steel City Sports
    SteelCitySports.com Jan 10, 2006

    Bill Cowher used his weekly stage to talk about his assistant coaches and their pursuit of some vacancies around the league. Reporters then used the stage to lob Cowher some softballs in the pursuit of a few media vacancies.


    BILL COWHER, Pittsburgh Steelers coach

    OK, couple things here before we get started. First of all, in regards to the coaching vacancies that exist around the National Football League, I can tell you I’ve been contacted by three teams in regards to Russ Grimm: That’s Detroit, New Orleans and Green Bay. One team has contacted us about Ken (Whisenhunt) and that’s St. Louis. In accordance with the league guidelines, we will allow them to talk. Most of these will be by telephone later in the week. I will tell the players, as I’ve told the coaches: There will be no more questions about it; there’ll be no discussion about it; our focus this week will be on the Indianapolis Colts. I don’t think it will be a distraction to our team at all, and having gone through the process myself, if anything it’s inspiring to know there’s an opportunity potentially for you. I’ve talked to Russ and Ken and like I said it’ll be later in the week because we’re in the process of game-planning for this game. We will provide that opportunity for them but there’ll be no more discussions about that from here on out.

    We’ve made a roster move: Quincy Morgan fractured his fibula in the game and will get it operated on tomorrow, so we will place him on injured reserve and we will sign Lee Mays to take his position on the roster, so Lee will be back with us.

    We have one player doubtful: that’s James Harrison (ankle). We have six players probable: Jerome Bettis (hamstring), Kimo von Oelhoffen (knee), Ben Roethlisberger (thumb), Clark Haggans (toe), Travis Kirschke (groin) and Joey Porter (hand).

    Obviously in the playoffs, any win is a big win for us. And I will say this again just to put it to an end with what happened to their quarterback: Carson Palmer is a bright young player in the National Football League; I’ve got tremendous respect for him, not just as a player, but the way he handles himself; the league will be better off with a player like that for the future. I know he’ll come back strong from this. I feel bad for him, but knowing him, just through Troy (Polamalu), he’s a hard-working guy. He’ll be back and we’ll be back trying to stop this guy again next year. There’s no question about it. You hate to see those things happen. No one felt worse about it than Kimo, or really our football team. We have a lot of respect for that football team. Cincinnati, it’s going to be a battle from here on out. There’s so much good talent over there; they’re well-coached. We feel very fortunate to be able to move on. We’re playing the number-one seed in the AFC and in many people’s eyes the number-one team in the National Football League. We’re going to have to play so much better than we played the last time we played them, and we’re going to have to play better than we played last week. It’s going to take a flawless effort on our part. We’re going to have to bring everything we have and more in this football game to have a chance to compete and or win this game. I think we understand that, but at the same time that’s why it’s the playoffs; that’s why you play the game. We’ll show up. We’ll be there, and hopefully we’ll do some things better than the last time we played them.

    Q: Are you surprised or disappointed by Marvin Lewis’s comment about Ben Roethlisberger’s old complaint?

    A: I would like to think it was said out of frustration. The last thing we ever do is comment on things that their players say. If I did, I could spend a whole press conference on some of the things that come out of that – off that -- team. I would like to think it was said out of frustration.

    Q: Does it bother you that some people are now calling your team dirty?

    A: I don’t know who’s done it. I think that’s something papers have a tendency to pick up on and they want to make a story that really isn’t there. I don’t know what the basis of that would be.

    Q: Can you play your underdog role to an advantage?

    A: If it is, tell me how I can use it to an advantage. I mean, we are what we are. This is the best team in football. The last time we played there we had an opportunity to play them then; we didn’t play very well. Obviously the only advantage I think we have is the fact we’ve gone through it. They were more physical than we were the last time we played them. We didn’t handle the noise well. We didn’t play very good football. If we do the same thing this time the results will be no different.

    Q: Since Ben was coming off an injury the last time, do you automatically feel he’ll play better?

    A: I don’t think it automatically does that. I like to think we’re playing a little bit better than the last time we went in there. We have some guys back that have played. It was Marvel (Smith)’s first game back, Ben’s first game back. But at the same time we had a lot of guys who had been playing and they had their guys. It’s going to come down to execution. We had 10 penalties the last time we were there. We weren’t able to get anything going offensively. We gave up the big play on the first play of the game that put us in a hole, almost like we did the other day. We’re going to have to play in all three phases. Our kicking game wasn’t real good the last time, special teams wise. We missed a makeable field goal; we don’t get a good punt out of the end zone; they only get a first down and they’re kicking field goals. Like I said it’s going to take a supreme effort on our part in all three phases for us to have a chance.

    Q: What did you take from their defensive effort that night?

    A: Well their defensive line creates a lot of havoc. We all know about Dwight Freeney, but those other guys inside – (Montae) Reagor and (Corey) Simon and (Larry) Triplett -- are very disruptive. They do a lot of slanting and stunting. They may not be big physically but they play strong and they play low and they play with leverage. Raheem Brock and (Robert) Mathis on the other side of Freeney give them six guys that they rotate in there. They’re fresh, strong, active. They can be very, very disruptive. They free up those linebackers, who can run – Brackett and June and Thornton – they can run, and you’d better account for 21 (Bob Sanders) and 20 (Mike Doss). Those two safeties are factors. They are excellent tacklers. There’s great team speed. They’re very disciplined defensively. Like I said, you’ve got to be on top and have everyone accounted for if you want to have success on a regular basis.

    Q: Twenty-one looked particularly aggressive.

    A: He’s a good football player. He plays the game hard. He is decisive. He takes great angles and when he comes he brings it all. Like I said before, this guy’s as good of a safety as there is in the National Football League.

    Q: Has having played there and in Minnesota helped your team with crowd noise?

    A: We will find out, but I would like to think having been there once, you know what to expect. Hopefully we will have learned. I don’t know if it ever really got that loud in Minnesota. But certainly when we walked out of that RCA Dome there was no question that it was louder than we had anticipated going in. So we understand what it’s going to be like and we’ll have to deal with it.

    Q: Were the false starts in Cincinnati because of the noise?

    A: It was loud. Some of that was that, yeah. We only had one with the line and two with the receivers. I guess that’s progress. If we keep our receivers more disciplined we’ll be OK. But we’re going to have to deal with that; we’ll deal with it this week and hopefully we’ll apply a little bit of discipline this Sunday.

    Q: With Morgan out, can you lean more on Heath Miller if you want to spread things out with four guys? Or do you go with Lee Mays or Sean Morey?

    A: We’ve got some options there so we’ll see how the week goes?

    Q: How much can the silent count help in this situation?

    A: Well you certainly are going to have to become a little unpredictable with that so you don’t want to give them the advantage of coming off on that as well, so we’ll have to work that element of it. We’ll see. We’ll have a different approach than we had the last time going in. The best way to deal with the noise is to play well. If you make plays and not let their crowd get into it, that’s the best thing you can do. If we just go out there and play like we have on the road with a lot of teams, but if you go out there and give up the first play of the game and let it be a touchdown, that’s not the greatest way of silencing a crowd. That has a lot to do with it. It’s really how you play, not so much what you do.

    Q: Is Ike Taylor on kick returns?

    A: That will be one of the options we’ll look at as well.

    Q: Is Nate Washington liable to be dressed and active?

    A: It certainly is an option that we will look at.

    Q: Are you confident of playing any offensive style?

    A: I am and I think our players are. We’ve put up some points when we’ve had to put up points; we’ve thrown the ball when we’ve had to throw the ball. This will be a big challenge again this week but I think we wouldn’t have got where we are right now if you aren’t a balanced football team. Yes, we want to run the football, but we feel we have some playmakers to throw the ball to as well. We feel we have a quarterback who’s playing as well as he’s played this year. I think he’s been in this situation before so he won’t be overwhelmed by it. We know the challenge. This is a good football team we’re playing and we’re going to have to be able to do both. They didn’t win 13 straight games by being one-dimensional. We cannot allow them to continue to tee off and we’ve got to be able to run the ball, but at the same time we have to make them respect us throwing it. We’ll have to be balanced. We’re not going to be able to be one-dimensional in this game on either side.

    Q: Has Cedrick Wilson done anything differently to emerge?

    A: No. Sometimes games unfold and opportunities present themselves. He’s done a good job. Ben put the ball out there to him and he makes big plays. He made a big play against this team last time we played them. We haven’t been a big throwing team so I guess when someone catches three or four balls it’s like news around here. But these guys are good football players. To their credit, sometimes they’d like to be on a team that throws the ball 35 or 40 times and some of their numbers would probably be a lot better than what they are because their numbers should not indicate how they are as receivers. It’s just kind of sometimes how the game unfolds and how we play the game around here.

    Q: Seven of your last eight playoff games have come against teams you’ve played during the season. What kind of information have you gleaned in that regard?

    A: I don’t look at it from that perspective. Certainly you know in the playoffs when you’ve played a team once. You’re going to see what they’ve done to you that you may counter the second time through, and then with you. The first time you play someone you’re not sure how they’re going to approach you, both sides of the ball. And the second time through you have a better sense of what they’re about so there’s a little bit of adjustment on both sides of the ball. So I think that again it’s a little bit more of a chess match than a get-acquainted type of situation. I just like the fact we’ve played in that dome once. That will not be foreign territory to us. It won’t make it any easier, trust me, but at least we know what we’re walking into.

    Q: I was scared in that stadium Sunday after Carson Palmer was hurt. There was so much tension. Were the players as afraid as I was? And were there any positives for the guys who experienced that?

    A: When you go on the road, you experience those emotions. It doesn’t take any one situation for that to take place. Those things happen, number one, when you’re playing a rivalry team with all of those things that were said leading up to the game. That has more to do with the talking that takes place between players. But when you’re in a hostile environment, and you’re dealing with the finality of the playoffs, you’re the underdog. You are. Face it. We understand that going in. We’re going to go in there and give it our best chance. You lose and you go home. I’m not so sure it hasn’t been that way the last four or five weeks. We understand the level of desperation that we have to play at, and it’s going to take our best football. We’ve got to be able to stay focused. There’s a fine line between going in there and being emotional and allowing it to have an adverse effect, which I think happened to us last week. We settled down more in the second half of that game but we lost our composure at times. I don’t want us to lose our emotion, but we can’t lose our composure. There’s a fine line and at times we kind of crossed that, but we have to play with that same emotion, that same level of desperation or else we are not going to move on.

    Q: Does playing an offense like the Bengals help?

    A: From a preparation standpoint yeah because we practiced a lot of that no-huddle last week and we were ready for it. So it will help from that standpoint, and it makes the practices that much faster. Our practices will be real fast because it’s all no-huddle, and that’s the way it’ll be again this week.

    Q: Three of four road teams won last week. Does that speak to the overall parity?

    A: I think it’s true. It’s where you are at the end of the year and how you’re playing. I really believe that has a lot to do with it. A bye is a big advantage, so you make your decisions accordingly, but you want to be playing your best football, playing with confidence, so there isn’t a sense of overreaction when you hit a little bit of adversity in the course of a game, which you’re going to face in a playoff game.

    Q: Your team was down 10 twice and both times your offense responded.

    A: Which is huge. You have to be able to not overcome things -- not overreact -- and respond. It’s important that when you feel a game start to sway, momentum-wise, to the other side that you’re able to come up with some series, some play that can change it and get it back to your side. You have to keep playing. You can’t overreact to things.

    Q: How difficult is it to stay sharp as a No. 1 seed with meaningless games and weeks off?

    A: I don’t remember losing any games coming off the bye. Of course, we lost that next game a few times. It’s up to the individual teams. You look at the coaches in this tournament; they’ve been there before. Don’t count on that for any kind of advantage.

    Q: How does this team compare to the Tampa Bay teams Tony Dungy coached?

    A: It’s hard to go back that far and compare. Tony’s like a lot of good coaches in this league: He’s taken the talent he has and doing what they do best. His defense has a lot of team speed with very active safeties and if they get up on you they can make it a long day for you. They have a lot of the same qualities. They’re a solid defense that doesn’t give up a lot of big plays. You have to be patient against them and I think that’s going to be the challenge we have, to be patient.

    Q: Does the no-huddle force you to give up on your personnel packages?

    A: We’ve got to try to do it, but we’ve got to be careful because they can go to that little attack thing they go to and they hurry up to the line of scrimmage and try to run a play before you can get your guys on there and they’ll get you with 12 guys on there. We’ll have to be judicious with how much we do substitution-wise, and if we’re going to do it we’re going to have to do it very quickly. We did it last time we played against them but we have to be ready to play with the people we have out there on second down and be ready to play with them on third down. We understood that going in and that’s how we’ll have to go into this game thinking as well.

    Q: Are you comfortable with the league’s stance on artificial crowd noise?

    A: Yes, I am.

    Q: As a guy with three teenage daughters, can you imagine what Tony went through a few weeks ago and do you think football might help him get through this?

    A: Well, to sit here and speculate on something like that … everyone’s heart in America went out to Tony and Lauren. I knew Tony and his kids when I was with him in Kansas City. I’ve not had a chance to talk to him personally. I will have a chance to do so before the game. I think we all understand and respect … no one has handled it more inspirationally than Tony and his wife. That’s the unfortunate part of our profession is that we live in a fishbowl and we have to experience that with the rest of America. Sometimes those are things you’d just like to share with those you are very close to, but as Tony has found out he’s very close to a lot of us. He’s a very special guy. My heart and prayers have always gone out to him and Lauren and their family. They’ll get through it. Tony’s a strong guy.

    Q: You scored seven points against them last time.

    A: Thanks for reminding me, but please don’t stop now.

    Q: And there was a short field when you scored the touchdown.

    A: Another great point.

    Q: What happened?

    A: Yes, we did not play very well against them offensively. There’s no question we have to play better.

    Q: When you look at the job Ike Taylor did in three games against Chad Johnson, how key was that?

    A: Ike has played well. He took that challenge on about mid-season when we started putting him on guys because of his ability to match up size-size and athletically, and he’s taken that as a challenge. He goes out there to practice every day looking to get better every day. He’s taken a big step this year. Now he’s got a chance to come back and look to play a little bit better than he did last week and I think he will. This will be a big one. I know every time you see a preview of this game, all they show is that first play over and over again, so he’s going to live with that and we don’t have to say much about that anymore. But he’s a good football player, and he’s learned and grown tremendously this year. The strides he’s taken from the beginning of the season to where he is now is something he will build on. The best I think is still ahead of him.

    Q: What’s your defensive game plan?

    A: You’ve got to be careful, but of all the weapons that they have Edgerrin James is the one guy. He makes some unbelievable runs. We had him pinned a couple times in the first game and the next thing you look up and he’s gained one yard or two yards. He is a very strong runner, great body lean, is always falling forward. There’s no one part of their team you can look to stop and therefore stop them; there are too many of them. You have to take a cat-and-mouse approach to them and try to get them to third downs and get off the field and limit the big plays. If we can do that and try to move the ball offensively and try to keep the ball out of their hands, I think that’s the best approach you can try to take against them. It’s not been too successful by many people, but that’s what we’re going to try to do.

    Q: Wasn’t that San Diego’s strategy? To contain James?

    A: It was. And they were able to get some pressure on Peyton. They got him a little out of sync. And then at the same time they threw the ball and got a couple big plays. Even the big run at the end of the game after Indy came back was a big play. It’s going to be one of those games where we have to play our best football, and we’ll have to do it for 60 minutes. It’s not going to be a game that’ll be decided in the first three quarters.

    Q: You had said you have to disguise up until the last few seconds against Manning. Were you having some success with that in the second quarter?

    A: There’s nothing you’re going to show him that he hasn’t seen. What he’s seeing, everybody’s tried at some point, some way. So you’ve got to be patient with what you show them. And at the same time you can’t jeopardize what your responsibilities are.

    Q: What made Ken Whisenhunt stand out to you when you hired him?

    A: Well Kenny was here. Kenny had earned the opportunity in-house. He had been around coaching the tight ends and I was very impressed with that. There’s a lot to be said when you can hire within.





    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Story URL: http://story.Scout.com/a.z?s=113&p=2&c=487521
    :thepacers

  • #2
    Re: Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

    Q: You scored seven points against them last time.

    A: Thanks for reminding me, but please don’t stop now.

    Q: And there was a short field when you scored the touchdown.

    A: Another great point.

    Q: What happened?

    A: Yes, we did not play very well against them offensively. There’s no question we have to play better.
    Reading the Bill Cowher press conference every week, there's always a funny exchange or two like that one.

    But in Bill's defense, he's never accused a Colts fan of loving their dog or cat. Back in week #10, he gave a strong no-comment when asked that question about fans of his own team. Not quite sure what that means, though...
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

      I know I have to hate Bill Cowher this week because he's the coach of the team we're about to whomp- excuse me, play this weekend, but I really like the guy for some reason.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

        Originally posted by Isaac@Section216
        I know I have to hate Bill Cowher this week because he's the coach of the team we're about to whomp- excuse me, play this weekend, but I really like the guy for some reason.
        It's the porn-stache. That thing is ultra sweet.
        :thepacers

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

          I've said for years that Bill Cowher is the best coach in all professional sports. But he's still got to figure out how to win the big one.

          He's the perfect coach in Pittsburgh - he's a local. He coaches old-fashioned, smashmouth football - they're always the hardest hitting team in the league. And most importantly, he's a players' coach. For as intense as he gets - with spit flying and his chin fully extended and curse words everywhere, you've never once heard players complain about him. His guys would run through a brick wall for him.

          One of these days, he'll win the big one.
          Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
          Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
          Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
          Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
          And life itself, rushing over me
          Life itself, the wind in black elms,
          Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

            Originally posted by Jay@Section204
            I've said for years that Bill Cowher is the best coach in all professional sports. But he's still got to figure out how to win the big one.

            HUH!?

            You don't see anything wrong with this statement?

            Especially coming from you. You must get all gushy and fun-loving for football.
            Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

              Originally posted by btowncolt©
              Yeah, he's admitted having a dual-personality problem when it comes to getting all googly-eyed for the Steelers.

              So he probably hasn't had a "Trade all 53 roster players" thread about the Steelers then?
              Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Scout.com} Thoughts: With Bill Cowher

                Hey, we've all got our baggage to deal with.
                Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                And life itself, rushing over me
                Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                Comment

                Working...
                X