Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

my lunch with David Stern

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • my lunch with David Stern

    Sorry I've taken so long to write this. Been busy.

    So, sis and I went to the season ticket holder luncheon on Wednesday. We had no details on what it was going to be, just got a card in the mail that said it was 11:30-1, $20 per.

    Well, we get there, and they're herding people to the elevators. They just checked my name, so I could have brought 20 people and they wouldn't have known. I think for a moment that we're actually eating in the Varsity Club cause of the elevator, but no, the girl hits the 'B' button. Pepsi Square here we come!

    That said, Pepsi Square cleans up nice. They had a podium with backdrop in the corner, and 15-20 banquet tables circling out from it, fine linen and all. Ended up ~150 people there. A fair number of Pacers brass, and other PS&E employees, including a nice woman from ticket sales who sat with us. She said everyone there was so excited about Stern coming, it was like a visit from the President. She'd only been here two years, so of course she hadn't been around for the Finals or anything, when I'm sure Stern being there would just be an afterthought.

    One interesting note I got from her. Ron was supposed to miss 6 weeks, and management was much more worried about him coming back so soon then they let on.

    Lunch was pretty good for $20, but not really our speed. You had a choice of regular or sparkling water (I didn't see one person get sparkling), and you could get iced tea (people at the next table sent their's back, saying it was "horrible.") Seafood salad followed by a good 8oz cut of filet on top of a cheesy, hashbrowns type thing. Good, but the beef, while cooked well, was really too tender, something I've never experienced before. Dessert was a rasberry creme tart thing. Our PS&E girl pointed out their head chef, and raved about him.

    After food was cleared, Mark Boyle introduced Larry, who'd eaten at the head table with Stern, Donnie, the Simons and the other grand poohbah muckity mucks. Larry said he'd gotten David to promise that Ronnie wouldn't be fined until at least July. "He can suspend him all summer if he wants. I also got him to promise there'd be no 4-point plays in the playoffs." Talks about 20 years ago when Stern was a rookie when he was a vet, then introduces him.

    Stern comes up and says that Larry was so nice and didn't say a thing when they ate, then gets up and gives him a hard time in front of everyone. He retorts by saying he thought he was gonna have lunch with Eddie (Larry's brother) and what a nice guy he is and how disappointed he was he got Larry instead. Someone at the head table took exception to that, and Stern said that no, he knows Eddie, yadda yadda yadda.

    Stern then went into his trademark, cookie cutter, blue print "Two America's" stump speech (oh, sorry, that's John Edwards.) I'm not gonna waste our time going over it. If you've heard or read him at all the last two years, you know what he said. Just look up his last State of the NBA speech.

    Before he opened it up to questions, he said he knew we'd slam him on officiating. So, he sympathized, talked about how hard it is, all the stuff they do, evaluations and so on, and they're improving. He said refs get 94% of the calls right, but of course it's the 6% everyone always concentrates on. (I noted later that night against Dallas that Ronnie Garretson was fitting in his 6% for the year all in one game.) Then he opened it up to questions.

    First guy talked about the fans getting screwed when players get suspended, like when Shaq was suspended for the game here. Why not having suspensions served only at home, so fans who come out to see teams on the road don't pay for it.

    Stern sympathized, but said he sees it as an IQ test, a theme he'd come back to time and time again, boiling down that the players need to know the situation and check themselves. He also noted when Jordan bumped a ref during his final year (which one, I don't know), and got suspended for a game at Phoenix. Well, the Suns were furious, cause it was his last game at America West, he was their biggest draw, and so on. But, there's no room for negotiation in disciplinary matters.

    I then got up and said I had read about a couple proposals for the upcoming CBA and wanted his thoughts on them. First is the idea of a progressive rookie-scale, where high schoolers can come in, but they get a 7-year rookie deal, while those who stay in school for 4 years only have a 3-year deal. Right there he interrupts me and says, "Let me stop you right there. I don't want you to give my whole game plan away."

    He went on to say that if they can't have a strict age limit, they had to come up with more creative ways to deal with the issue. Not only with that, but also setting up a farm system so the Tyson Chandlers, Eddie Currys and Kwame Browns could get some playing time. He could tell by my reaction that that was my second question, and so I added that he'd talked about Europe, and asked if they'd considered as part of ramping up to that having farm teams over there, instead of going straight for the pro franchises.

    He said no, in regards to Europe, they're either gonna go big or stay home. He then started what I thought was his standard defense of the NBDL, but then he veered off into something surprising. He noted guys who have come up from the DL, name dropping Anthony Johnson among others, and then said what they need to do is expand it. "In fact, if there's anyone who wants to own a franchise, come see me afterwards. No, I'm serious." He said the current DL will become just one region of what they're planning, and what they want to do is add a group of teams in the midwest, and eventually, there'd be a "midwest pod, southeast pod, and a west pod." Of course, by then I was so geeked out I practically fainted.

    The next guy asked how happy they were with the new TV deal, and very pointedly asked why we're never on national tv. Stern said you get on by having the kind of season we're having right now, and alluded that we'd obviously be on more next year.

    Going back to the tv deal in general, he talked about how broadcast ratings are way down across the board, they wanted to move more towards on-demand services that cable provides, but, he is a traditionalist that'd prefer more games on ABC. He then caught himself, saying that he can't say anything bad about auto racing considering where he was, but he indicated he'd rather they were on instead of IRL. He also got off on a tangent concerning the NFL and tv negotiations, which basically boiled down to the NFL was the only sport who could make a go of it on broadcast tv only, and they'd accepted that.

    Next was a long, rambling question that basically boiled down to if Stern felt that the reputation of a player like Artest can color a ref's perceptions to the point he expects trouble and jumps the gun on calling something that really didn't happen.

    Stern - "Yes."

    After a long pause, he continued in refering back to his IQ test thing, and that the responsibility ultimately falls on the player. He conceded that they give refs scouting reports before games, telling them stuff to look for, like (pointing to Bird) "Larry keeps holding his man's jersey when he thinks nobody's looking."

    As for Ron in particular, his reputation is a shame because "he's such a nice young man, such a caring person." But, once again, it comes down to personal responsibility.

    The last questioner echoed the last guy about Ron not getting a fair shake, then went on to give a diatribe on Reggie not getting the respect he deserves, that people outside of Indy thinks he's a thug, and he doesn't get nearly the media attention he deserves.

    Stern disagreed, saying that Reggie gets a ton of attention, especially in New York, deservedly so. He said in the 90's you couldn't turn around without seeing some shot he hit against the Knicks. He closed in saying that there's not a knowledgeable fan of basketball alive who doesn't know Reggie Miller is a sure-fire Hall-of-Famer.

    That's it. One note. Somewhere in there while discussing officiating, he talked about how much he hates technicals. Basketball is the only sport where a team gives up points (noting it's a free throw), and it makes him sick. So of course, the game he attended that night had a record number of T's, which was ironically enough attributed to the refs wanting to keep a lid on the game because Stern was in attendance.

    Also, Peck, if you're reading, I found your Dream Girl. There was a woman sitting at our table that got all excited when she saw Donnie Walsh. She said she wanted to go "bow at his feet and say how much I worship him." When Stern talked about what a great exec Donnie is and that he was the class of the NBA, I thought her head was gonna explode. I think my sister remembers her name. Say the word, Peck, and we'll try to get her number for you.

    :P
    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

  • #2
    Re: my lunch with David Stern

    There will be no happier person around than me if they institute a graduated payscale. All businesses pay for experience/education why not pro-sports?

    There are certain jobs I can't get and certain pay-levels I'll never attain because I don't have certain experiences or degrees. Seems right to me.
    Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: my lunch with David Stern

      small world, Kegboy. I was sitting at your table.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: my lunch with David Stern

        small world, Kegboy. I was sitting at your table.
        LOL, I think Peck will never be the same now.
        "It's just unfortunate that we've been penalized so much this year and nothing has happened to the Pistons, the Palace or the city of Detroit," he said. "It's almost like it's always our fault. The league knows it. They should be ashamed of themselves to let the security be as lax as it is around here."

        ----------------- Reggie Miller

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: my lunch with David Stern

          I was also there, kegboy. Good job on your questions. Mine would have been on the luxury tax, but being shy I was a little slow in trying to get the microphone holder's attention.

          It was a nice event and the 20 bucks charged was more than fair.

          My bonus for the luncheon was that, since my son and I arrived a tad late, we wound up riding in the elevator with Larry the Legend, the Commish, and their entourage.

          Larry Legend also signed his autograph after the luncheon.

          I had never met Bird before. He is one tall dude.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: my lunch with David Stern

            Peck will never be the same??? Are Peck and Kegboy the same person.....I can't keep up anymore.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: my lunch with David Stern

              Great report Kboy, sorry I missed the lunch, your question was a good one.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: my lunch with David Stern

                Peck will never be the same??? Are Peck and Kegboy the same person.....I can't keep up anymore.
                I was referring to what Kegboy wrote here:

                "Also, Peck, if you're reading, I found your Dream Girl. There was a woman sitting at our table that got all excited when she saw Donnie Walsh. She said she wanted to go "bow at his feet and say how much I worship him." When Stern talked about what a great exec Donnie is and that he was the class of the NBA, I thought her head was gonna explode. I think my sister remembers her name. Say the word, Peck, and we'll try to get her number for you."

                From what I know Kegboy and Peck are different people.
                "It's just unfortunate that we've been penalized so much this year and nothing has happened to the Pistons, the Palace or the city of Detroit," he said. "It's almost like it's always our fault. The league knows it. They should be ashamed of themselves to let the security be as lax as it is around here."

                ----------------- Reggie Miller

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: my lunch with David Stern


                  ... the beef, while cooked well, was really too tender, something I've never experienced before.

                  :P
                  So, how is this possible, unless the chef chewed it up for a while, then spit it back on your plate?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: my lunch with David Stern

                    Kegboy> I was there also, not much to add to your excellant report. The filet and potato stuff were very good, but that garden weed salad really sucked.
                    "Just look at the flowers ........ BANG" - Carol "The Walking Dead"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: my lunch with David Stern

                      I don't think I realized this event was with David Stern, or I would have made the drive...





                      Nice report, Kegboy.
                      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                      And life itself, rushing over me
                      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: my lunch with David Stern

                        I agree with everyone else, great report Kegboy!

                        Liked that dig at Peck, must be the day to pick on Peck. Or Peck on Peck . . . whatever. <giggle>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: my lunch with David Stern

                          Great report Keg. Thanks!
                          Mickael Pietrus Le site officiel

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: my lunch with David Stern

                            Also, Peck, if you're reading, I found your Dream Girl. There was a woman sitting at our table that got all excited when she saw Donnie Walsh. She said she wanted to go "bow at his feet and say how much I worship him." When Stern talked about what a great exec Donnie is and that he was the class of the NBA, I thought her head was gonna explode. I think my sister remembers her name. Say the word, Peck, and we'll try to get her number for you.
                            I take it she was being sarcastic?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: my lunch with David Stern

                              Great report. Is it time for us at Pacers Digest to ante up and get one of those development franchises?
                              The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X