Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

    Jackson is an outstanding athlete -- he was a running back in high school and played safety and corner. He reminds me of Ty Law -- he doesn't have burning speed but is a very tough player and does a good job against the run. He's good enough against the pass to play for a zone team like Indy.

    Kirwan on Jackson: Jackson is a versatile player who has a real team attitude. The Colts need to develop a defensive personality. With the Colts having the lead in most of the games they play and the Colts in nickel and dime defense often, they need Jackson right away.

    http://nfl.com/draft/analyzer



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OVERVIEW

    The unquestioned leader of the Wolverines' defense, Jackson was also one of their most versatile players. He played every position in the secondary, but still went on to set several school records. Switching positions became commonplace for Jackson and he even changed jersey numbers, changing from No. 3 to No. 20 prior to the 2002 season.

    Jackson earned USA Today All-America and Pennsylvania Player of the Year accolades as a senior at Sharon (Pa.) High School, where he was also chosen Northeast Player of the Year by SuperPrep. The all-state pick twice earned All-Mercer County Conference honors on both offense and defense.

    He recorded 281 tackles, 19 stops for losses, three sacks, seven forced fumbles and three fumble recoveries during his career. He made 18 career interceptions, returning four of those picks for touchdowns. Marlin also rushed 15 times for 330 yards and five touchdowns, caught 57 passes for 1,026 yards and 18 scores, returned 12 kickoffs for 236 yards (19.6 avg.) and scored twice. He also lettered in basketball three times, twice earning all-conference honors.

    Jackson was a freshman All-America choice by The Sporting News as a true freshman, lining up at cornerback. He recorded 50 tackles (39 solos) with two interceptions and four pass deflections while starting seven games in 2001. As a sophomore, Jackson picked up All-America first-team honors from College Football News. Starting every game, he collected 51 tackles (39 solos) with three interceptions and established a school season-record with 18 pass deflections in 2002. He also set a Wolverine game-record with six pass breakups against Washington.

    Jackson shifted to safety in 2003. Despite missing three games with a left quadriceps and groin pull and another due to suspension, he collected 47 tackles (35 solos) with seven pass deflections and three interceptions while starting seven of 11 games. He moved back to cornerback as a senior, earning All-America first-team honors while serving as team captain. Marlin was credited with 47 tackles (34 solos) with six stops for losses, four pass deflections and an interception.

    In 45 games with the Wolverines, Jackson started 39 times. He finished his career with 195 tackles (147 solos), two sacks for minus-13 yards and 13 stops for losses of 43 yards. He also caused five fumbles, deflected 34 passes, gained 77 yards with a touchdown on nine interceptions and blocked two kicks. Only Todd Howard (41, 1998-2001) had more pass breakups in a career at Michigan than Jackson's 34.

    ANALYSIS

    Positives Tall, rangy athlete with a slender but defined frame with long arms and tight skin … Can play all secondary positions and is a smart, instinctive athlete who has the range to make plays in pursuit … Shows very good man- and zone-coverage skills, reacting quickly to the ball in flight … Has outstanding instincts and a good knowledge of the defense, making all of the adjustment calls in the secondary … Can play either tight or loose in man coverage, showing the speed to stay stride for stride with the receivers on deep routes … Scans the field well and is quick to pick up blocking schemes … Reacts quickly to pass and has the jumping ability to go vertical and make adjustments on the ball in flight … When he plants and drives, Jackson shows a good closing burst to make plays in front of him … Durable athlete with good range and catch-up speed … His ability to play most of the secondary positions is a plus … Can also handle return duties, but would only recommend that he do so in emergency situations … Knows all the alignments and matchups to make the coverage calls and checks in the secondary … His combination of size, strength and versatility will see him contribute immediately as a nickel back, and he will be a factor for some team's defensive backfield before long.

    Negatives … Gathers himself a bit in transition and while he can backpedal and turn, he looks a little awkward moving in reverse … Can be fooled by play action, but does a good job of coming up to support in the short area … Uses his hands effectively to redirect receivers early in their routes, but gambles too much in man coverage and that causes him to be caught away from the play … Needs to show more aggression and get physical with the receivers in press coverage, and seems to lack cover sense when his back is to the ball … Has good feet and a quick hip turn, but in off coverage schemes he sometimes is too inconsistent to maintain cushion … Struggles to keep his feet in transition and will bite on double moves by the receiver because he does not have the agility to recover … Decent tackler, but needs to show better consistency wrapping up … Tends to take poor angles in run support and does not seem to avoid blocks well when working near the line of scrimmage … Not the type that can be effective blitzing off the edge, as Jackson does not have the hand usage to disengage and shed vs. the larger blockers … Has good natural strength to make tackles in run support, but is more of a drag-down and angle tackler, as he fails to use his hands effectively to wrap and secure … Needs to play in more control during run support, as Jackson does not look comfortable working in space … Is a confident cornerback, but did not look natural playing free safety as a junior … Does not always get himself into good position to make the play, opening his hips too early.

    INJURY REPORT

    2003 -- Sat out the Illinois (Oct. 18), Purdue (Oct. 25) and Michigan State (Nov. 1) games due to left quadriceps and groin pulls.

    AGILITY

    4.49 in the 40-yard dash … 340-pound bench press … 510-pound squat … 323-pound power clean … 34½-inch vertical jump.

    HIGH SCHOOL

    Attended Sharon (Pa.) High School, playing football for coach Jim Wildman … USA Today All-America first-team and named Player of the Year in Pennsylvania … Earned all-state honors as a senior and was a Prep Football Report All-American … Two-time Mercer County Conference first-team selection on defense and offense … Recorded 281 tackles, 19 stops for losses, three sacks, forced seven fumbles and recovered three fumbles during his career … Also made 18 career interceptions, returning four of those picks for touchdowns … Rushed 15 times for 330 yards and five touchdowns, caught 57 passes for 1,026 yards and 18 touchdowns and returned 12 kickoffs for 236 yards (19.6 avg) and scored two touchdowns … Lettered three times in basketball, twice earning first-team all-conference honors.

    PERSONAL

    General Studies major, enrolled in the College of Literature, Science and the Arts … Attended the 2000 Michigan Summer Football Camp … Born Marlin Tyrell Jackson on June 30, 1983 … Resides in Sharon, Pa.

    http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2005/jackson_marlin
    Originally posted by Natston;n3510291
    I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of the 3 T.J.s working for them, and that ain't bad...
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

    Originally posted by cramerica
    Marlin Jackson is a rare individual, blessed with immense physical talent, but cursed with a past he can't run from fast enough. It's why that when he had the chance to declare his eligibility for the 2004 draft and didn't, Jackson continues to prove that he's a one-of-kind prospect.

    Jackson has all the ability and raw materials one might need when constructing the ideal cornerback. Big, strong, fast and flexible are words that only begin to describe how he plays on the field for the Wolverines. Yet he's back for one more season at Ann Arbor, in part to earn his degree, but also to prove once and for all that he has matured into the best defensive back in college football.

    The funny thing is Jackson might have been the best defensive back before the 2003 season, too. But after earning a one-year probation following an assault accusation, missing four games due to various leg injuries, plus an odd switch from corner to safety, Jackson's last hurrah at Michigan was not quite what he had hoped for himself.

    Jackson is back home at corner in 2004, and he re-assumes the role of the best cover player in the nation. At corner, he is rarely challenged, and he dupes opposing quarterbacks into throwing his way only to show off his impressive closing speed. Jackson may gamble a bit much for a team like the Texans who like to put their corners on an island in man coverage, but he's already got what it takes to be an immediate starter in 2005.

    (From HoustonProFootball.com)
    Additional Links and Info wanted...
    Originally posted by Natston;n3510291
    I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of the 3 T.J.s working for them, and that ain't bad...

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

      Originally posted by btowncolt
      He's a good player. I like him. But he can't stop the run from the CB position.
      Agreed. Not only that, but I completely believe that the secondary will continue to be destroyed as long as the defensive line cannot get a push up the middle. I'm tired of seeing Dwight Freeney run around and by the offensive line while double-teamed while Larry Triplett is laying on the ground on his back, struggling to get off the ground like a frightened turtle.

      Jackson is going to help, no doubt about that. I have to see some players picked to help out in the front seven though.
      Take me out to the black, tell 'em I ain't coming back. Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

        Strengths: Is a big, physical corner. Is at his best pressing WR's. Has the confidence and mentality you look for in a DC. Can play zone or man-coverage. Is also experienced and has great success covering the slot WR. Has good height, bulk and strength. Is experienced at DC and DS. Has good upper body strength and power. Impressive 23 reps on the 225-pound bench press at the combine. Will challenge WR's and isn't afraid to get physical in coverage. He matches up extremely well against bigger receivers. Will get in receivers' faces at the LOS. Does an excellent job in terms of his technique in press technique and will consistently take receivers out of their routes. He does a great job with his hands in terms of dictating WR's routes. He has excellent balance and shows great burst out of his pedal. Also has impressive short-area quickness and COD skills for his size. Breaks hard on the ball in front of him. Shows excellent closing burst when coming forward. He is fluid and smooth. Shows the ability to turn and run with most receivers. A solid tackler with good size, strength and toughness in run support. Shows power at the POA and isn't afraid to mix it up.

        Weaknesses: Lacks ideal top-end speed. Makes too many over-aggressive moves and won't have the pure speed to recover in the NFL. His recognition skills and ability to read quarterback's eyes must improve. He will gamble too much in man coverage and will get caught out of position. Doesn't show good ball skills. Is around the ball a lot but doesn't make enough big plays. Has some character and durability concerns. Also has been inconsistent on the field. Did not make a smooth transition to FS in 2003 and is a much better fit at DC. He does not look as natural and comfortable in a lot of space at DS.

        Overall: Jackson played in 11 games and started seven as a true freshman. He started every game at cornerback in 2003 and set a record with six passes broken up vs. Washington and Reggie Williams (Jaguars 1st round pick in 2004) in the season opener. Jackson was suspended for the first game of the 2003 season. The suspension came after Jackson was charged with assault regarding an on-campus incident in which he allegedly punched a fellow student. Jackson then moved to FS as a junior in 2003 because of team needs. He missed three more games due to a leg injury and finished with 50 tackles, two interceptions and four passes broken up. He moved back to cornerback in 2004, where he started all 12 games and finished with 47 total tackles, six tackles for loss, one INT and four PBU. Jackson's experience at safety gives him more versatility. However, in our opinion, he is a better NFL prospect at the cornerback position. Jackson has had some trouble off the field and his play on the field was inconsistent throughout his career. He also lacks ideal speed and has not shown enough playmaking ability in coverage. However, he has the size, strength, athletic ability, man-to-man cover skills and confidence to develop into a starter in the NFL, which is why he grades out as a late-first or early-second round draft prospect in 2005.

        ESPN Insider
        Originally posted by Natston;n3510291
        I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of the 3 T.J.s working for them, and that ain't bad...

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

          The reason they took him is that they couldn't believe that he was still available when they picked. Sure it made more sense to go with a run stopper, but he was too good to pass up. There is still plenty of run D in this draft.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

            OK then, they felt they needed an upgrade at corner, and knew any CB worth having would be gone well before their 2nd round pick. Better?

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

              Would you stil feel the same way if Crowder or Blackstock end up falling to the Colts and they get a great corner to go along with a run stopper.

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

                I know what company line is, but that's simply not true.

                Marlin was projected to go 29 at the earliest, about 42 at the latest. They weren't expecting him to go any higher. He was, after all, the 5th corner taken in the 1st round.
                ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++

                Simply not true? Based on who's opinion. I believe the difference between
                all the mock draft boards and what reality says based on team evaluations
                especially after the first round is totally different. Jackon was thoroughly
                convinced he was going anytime after the 20th pick. He definitely would have been gone after NE's pick at 31.
                Excellent pick by the Colts.


                owl
                {o,o}
                |)__)
                -"-"-

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

                  I really liked Marlin Jackson at UM. He's a very physical corner, which sometimes results in him getting flagged, but I've noticed he also gets a lot of "superstar calls" where he can get away with a lot of contact others can't.

                  He always seemed to underachieve at U-M, but you could never deny this kid had a lot of ability.

                  It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                  Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                  Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                  NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

                    disagree entirely with the cover 2 comment. Jackson REALLY struggled in zone coverage at U-M. He likes it when he can man up a receiver and knock him down. He gets lost defending space.

                    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: The Official Marlin Jackson Thread

                      Ohhh Reginald....I disagree!
                      Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                      Comment

                      Previous template Next
                      Working...
                      X